The optimal setting of complex fractionated atrial electrogram software in substrate ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-targeted catheter ablation (CFAE ablation) requires a high rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) termination to provide good outcomes. We determined the optimal settings of CFAE software. METHODS: In our 430 consecutive patients, AF was terminated in 97 (234/242) and 79% (149/188) of patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively, by CFAE ablation combined with (31%) or without (69%) pulmonary vein isolation, occasionally with nifekalant infusion. We analyzed 109 consecutive patients who underwent CFAE ablation to determine the optimal settings for comparing subjective versus objective decisions by the CFAE software on CARTO3. We compared three settings: the default setting (0.05-0.15 mV, 50-120 ms) and two modified settings (#1: 0.05-0.30 mV, 40-70 ms, #2: 0.05-0.13 mV, 10-20 ms). We retrospectively analyzed 11,425 points during left atrial mapping before ablation and 10,306 points that were subjectively detected and ablated as CFAE points. An interval confidence level ≥6 denoted a site with CFAE. RESULTS: With the default setting, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive productive value, and negative productive values were 67, 42, 77, 48, and 73%, respectively. With modified setting #1, the values were 78, 55, 87, 74, and 77%, respectively, versus 64, 82, 60, 53, and 91%, respectively, for modified setting #2. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that setting #1 was generally superior to the default setting, whereas setting #2 was optimal for excluding areas not requiring ablation. The optimal CFAE software setting was a voltage of 0.05-0.30 mV and an interval parameter of 40-70 ms.

Effectiveness of esophagus detection by three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping to avoid esophageal injury during ablation of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Esophageal-left atrial (LA) fistula during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a fatal event. We explored the relation of the esophagus-to-ablated point distance and esophageal temperature rise. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=106) underwent complex fractionated atrial electrogram-guided AF ablation using CartoMerge; the pulmonary veins were isolated in 23 patients. Maximum radiofrequency (RF) power near the esophagus was 15 W. Ablated points with esophageal temperature rise (monitored with a probe) to ≥38.0°C were tagged; if ≥39.0°C, RF was discontinued. RESULTS: Of 1647 ablated points near the esophagus, 274 were associated with a temperature rise to 38.0-38.9°C and 241 points to ≥39.0°C. Distances (mm) from points to esophagus were 5.1 ± 0.6 (no rise), 4.2±3.1 (38.0-38.9°C), 2.9 ± 2.5 (≥39.0°C). Altogether, 15.5% of points in the upper LA posterior wall, 41.5% in the middle, and 30.2% in the lower caused rises to ≥38.0°C; 8.7%, 24.6%, and 11.0% caused rises to ≥39.0°C. The middle wall was most affected (p<0.01), as shown by multiple logistic regression analysis (both temperatures). Points causing a rise increased significantly as distance decreased (p<0.001). The odds ratio for rise to ≥38.0°C compared with <4.0 to >5.0 mm distance was 2.28 (p=0.004). The longest distance for ≥38.0°C rise was 18.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Distance is an important predictor of esophageal temperature rise. The middle LA posterior wall is most vulnerable. A dose of 15 W is too high for ablation, especially <4.0 mm from the esophagus. Points >20.0 mm away are relatively safe.

Highly sensitive lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive α-fetoprotein is useful for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease.

The fucosylated fraction of α-fetoprotein (AFP-L3) is a specific marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, conventional AFP-L3% (c-AFP-L3%) has not always been reliable in cases with low serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels. In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of a newly developed assay, highly sensitive AFP-L3% (hs-AFP-L3%). Subjects included 74 patients with benign liver disease (BLD), including chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis, and 94 with HCC. Serum hs-AFP-L3% was significantly higher than c-AFP-L3% in patients with early-stage HCC (solitary or <20 mm in diameter). Additionally, hs-AFP-L3% was significantly increased in patients with well-differentiated HCC. In patients with serum AFP <20 ng/ml, the sensitivities of c-AFP-L3% and hs-AFP-L3% were 12.5 and 44.6%, respectively, at a cut-off value of 5%. In 59 BLD patients with serum AFP <20 ng/ml, the HCC-positive rate in patients with hs-AFP-L3% ≥ 5% was significantly higher compared to those with hs-AFP-L3% <5% during the follow-up period (median, 35 months; range, 5-48 months). Importantly, none of the BLD patients with both serum AFP <20 ng/ml and hs-AFP-L3% <5% developed HCC. These results indicated that hs-AFP-L3% is useful for early detection of HCC in BLD patients, even for those with serum AFP <20 ng/ml. Furthermore, since hs-AFP-L3% increases before HCC is detectable by various advanced imaging modalities, this assay may help identify BLD patients with a higher risk of HCC.