Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Femoral Nerve/drug effects , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Aged , Anesthesia, General , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Female , Femoral Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, InterventionalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Polymorphic thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) is a major determinant of thiopurine toxicity. METHODS: We extracted 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGNs) and 6-methylmercaptopurine nucleotides (6-MMPNs) from erythrocytes with perchloric acid and converted them to 6-thioguanine (6-TG) and a 6-methylmercaptopurine (6-MMP) derivative during a 60-min acid hydrolysis step. The liquid chromatography system consisted of a C(18) column with an ammonium acetate-formic acid-acetonitrile buffer. 8-Bromoadenine was the internal standard. Analytes were measured with positive ionization and multiple reaction monitoring mode. With PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and TaqMan allelic discrimination, common TPMT alleles (*1, *2, *3A, *3B, *3C) were determined in 31 792 individuals. We used perchloric acid extraction, acid hydrolysis, and HPLC with ultraviolet detection to measure erythrocyte 6-TG and 6-MMP nucleotide concentrations in 6189 patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine therapy. RESULTS: Intra- and interday imprecision were <10% at low and high analyte concentrations. The conversion of 6-TG and 6-MMP nucleoside mono-, di-, and triphosphates was complete after hydrolysis. Allelic frequency for TPMT variant alleles ranged from 0.0063% (*3B) to 3.61% (*3A). Compared with wild types, TPMT heterozygotes had an 8.3-fold higher risk for 6-TGNs >450 pmol/8 x 10(8) erythrocytes (concentration associated with increased risk for leukopenia), but an 8.2-fold lower risk for 6-MMPNs >5700 pmol/8 x 10(8) erythrocytes (concentration associated with increased risk for hepatotoxicity). CONCLUSIONS: The liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method can be applied to the routine monitoring of thiopurine therapy. The association between TPMT genotype and metabolite concentrations illustrates the utility of pharmacogenetics in the management of patients undergoing treatment with thiopurines.
Subject(s)
Azathioprine/therapeutic use , Erythrocytes/chemistry , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Mercaptopurine/therapeutic use , Methyltransferases/genetics , Purine Nucleotides/blood , Adult , Azathioprine/blood , Chromatography, Liquid , Cohort Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Genetic Variation , Guanine Nucleotides/blood , Humans , Hydrolysis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/blood , Male , Mass Spectrometry , Mercaptopurine/analogs & derivatives , Mercaptopurine/blood , Thionucleotides/bloodABSTRACT
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a generic term that refers to Crohn's disease and chronic ulcerative colitis (UC). The CD and UC are considered to be distinct forms of IBD; but there is a subgroup of CD with a UC-like presentation. The genetic factors play a significant role in IBD. IBD is associated with a strong familial pattern. Recent studies support the hypothesis that IBD patients have a dysregulated immune response to endogenous bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. The serologic responses seen in Crohn's disease include antibodies to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mycobacteria, bacteroides and E. coli. The pANCA antibody seen in UC and CD has been demonstrated to react with epitopes of H1 histone, Bacteroides caccae (Ton-B linked outer membrane protein), Pseudomonas fluorescens-associated bacterial protein I-2, mycobacterial histone 1 homologue called Hup B. In recent years, several serologic markers have been found to be useful for the diagnosis and differentiation of CD and UC. These markers include the following antibodies: (a) pANCA, (b) ASCA, (c) anti-pancreatic antibody, (d) OmpC antibody and (e) I-2 antibody and antibodies to anaerobic coccoid rods. The application of a panel of markers with the use of an algorithm (i.e. IBD First Step) can identify specific subtypes of IBD that have different clinical courses and progression of the diseases. The serologic markers are useful for the diagnosis and management of CD and UC patients.