Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 189: 109947, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35709911

ABSTRACT

AIM: Report the outcomes of pregnant women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and to identify modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with poor outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of pregnancy preparedness, pregnancy care and outcomes in the Republic of Ireland from 2015 to 2020 and subsequent multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In total 1104 pregnancies were included. Less than one third attended pre-pregnancy care (PPC), mean first trimester haemoglobin A1c was 7.2 ± 3.6% (55.5 ± 15.7 mmol/mol) and 52% received pre-conceptual folic acid. Poor preparation translated into poorer pregnancy outcomes. Livebirth rates (80%) were comparable to the background population however stillbirth rates were 8.7/1000 (four times the national rate). Congenital anomalies occurred in 42.5/1000 births (1.5 times the background rate). More than half of infants were large for gestational age and 47% were admitted to critical care. Multivariate analyses showed strong associations between non-attendance at PPC, poor glycaemic control and critical care admission (adjusted odds ratio of 1.68 (1.48-1.96) and 1.61 (1.43-1.86), p < 0.05 respectively) for women with type 1 diabetes. Smoking and teratogenic medications were also associated with critical care admission and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes are suboptimal. Significant effort is needed to optimize the modifiable factors identified in this study.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Pregnancy in Diabetics , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Pregnancy in Diabetics/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
2.
Br J Clin Psychol ; 46(Pt 2): 211-22, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17524214

ABSTRACT

Within psychological services in Primary Care, service providers are expected and required to deliver clinical services that are prompt, safe and effective. However, long wait-times for treatment are common, with attendant clinical chronicity and risk issues. Evaluations of group-based treatments in Primary Care, which are clinically more efficient than individual treatments, are extremely scarce. The current evaluation attempted to appraise the effectiveness of a service innovation of introducing group-based psychoeducational cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT; N=43), by comparing outcomes with clients treated in individual CBT (N=68) and individual psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy (N=65). Group psychoeducational participants completed validated scales of psychological functioning (Beck Depression Inventory - 2, BDI-2; Brief Symptom Inventory, BSI; Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, IIP-32; and General Health Questionnaire, GHQ-12) at assessment, start of group, termination of group and 3-month follow-up, whereas participants in the individual therapies completed measures only at initiation and termination of treatment. The results indicate broad similarities between the outcomes achieved by the three services, with rates of clinically significant improvements and deteriorations comparable in the main across services. The results are discussed in terms of identified methodological limitations, service implications and models of service delivery for the psychological therapies in Primary Care.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Psychoanalytic Therapy/methods , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics/methods , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv ; 43(11): 33-6, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16350913

ABSTRACT

In contrast to general medical hospitals, psychiatric hospitals often allow patients to smoke cigarettes. In addition to obvious health concerns, smoking can also interfere with clinical assessments and therapeutic activities, Implementation of a smoking ban on an acute male admissions unit did not result in any increase in aggressive behaviors. In addition, staff attitudes following the ban improved, and most staff members believed the ban was both ethical and beneficial to patients. Our research indicates that banning smoking on an acute admissions unit is feasible and well tolerated by patients and staff, although it may require extra vigilance for smoking-related contraband.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Psychiatric , Mental Disorders/nursing , Organizational Policy , Patient Admission , Smoking Cessation , Smoking Prevention , Adult , Aggression/psychology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Nursing Research , Crisis Intervention , Feasibility Studies , Health Plan Implementation , Humans , Male , North Carolina
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...