Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after the Ross procedure: a report from the German-Dutch Ross Registry.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study is to report major cardiac and cerebrovascular events after the Ross procedure in the large adult and pediatric population of the German-Dutch Ross registry. These data could provide an additional basis for discussions among physicians and a source of information for patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: One thousand six hundred twenty patients (1420 adults; 1211 male; mean age, 39.2±16.2 years) underwent a Ross procedure between 1988 and 2008. Follow-up was performed on an annual basis (median, 6.2 years; 10 747 patient-years). Early and late mortality were 1.2% (n=19) and 3.6% (n=58; 0.54%/patient-year), respectively. Ninety-three patients underwent 99 reinterventions on the autograft (0.92%/patient-year); 78 reinterventions in 63 patients on the pulmonary conduit were performed (0.73%/patient-year). Freedom from autograft or pulmonary conduit reoperation was 98.2%, 95.1%, and 89% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Preoperative aortic regurgitation and the root replacement technique without surgical autograft reinforcement were associated with a greater hazard for autograft reoperation. Major internal or external bleeding occurred in 17 (0.15%/patient-year), and a total of 38 patients had composite end point of thrombosis, embolism, or bleeding (0.35%/patient-year). Late endocarditis with medical (n=16) or surgical treatment (n=29) was observed in 38 patients (0.38%/patient-year). Freedom from any valve-related event was 94.9% at 1 year, 90.7% at 5 years, and 82.5% at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Although longer follow-up of patients who undergo Ross operation is needed, the present series confirms that the autograft procedure is a valid option to treat aortic valve disease in selected patients. The nonreinforced full root technique and preoperative aortic regurgitation are predictors for autograft failure and warrant further consideration. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00708409.

Autograft regurgitation and aortic root dimensions after the Ross procedure: the German Ross Registry experience.

BACKGROUND: Autograft regurgitation and root dilatation after the Ross procedure is of major concern. We reviewed data from the German Ross Registry to document the development of autograft regurgitation and root dilatation with time and also to compare 2 different techniques of autograft implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2006 1014 patients (786 men, 228 women; mean age 41.2+/-15.3 years) underwent the Ross procedure using 2 different implantation techniques (subcoronary, n=521; root replacement, n=493). Clinical and serial echocardiographic follow up was performed preoperatively and thereafter annually (mean follow up 4.41+/-3.11 years, median 3.93 years, range 0 to 16.04 years; 5012 patient-years). For statistical analysis of serial echocardiograms, a hierarchical multilevel modeling technique was applied. Eight early and 28 late deaths were observed. Pulmonary autograft reoperations were required in 35 patients. Initial autograft regurgitation grade was 0.49 (root replacement 0.73, subcoronary 0.38) with an annual increase of grade 0.034 (root replacement 0.0259, subcoronary 0.0231). Annulus and sinus dimensions did not exhibit an essential increase over time in both techniques, whereas sinotubular junction diameter increased essentially by 0.5 mm per year in patients with root replacement. Patients with the subcoronary implantation technique showed nearly unchanged dimensions. Bicuspid aortic valve morphology did not have any consistent impact on root dimensions with time irrespective of the performed surgical technique. CONCLUSIONS: The present Ross series from the German Ross Registry showed favorable clinical and hemodynamic results. Development of autograft regurgitation for both techniques was small and the annual progression thereof is currently not substantial. Use of the subcoronary technique and aortic root interventions with stabilizing measures in root replacement patients seem to prevent autograft regurgitation and dilatation of the aortic root within the timeframe studied.

High incidence of sudden death late after anterior LV-aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: Sudden death due to ventricular arrhythmias occurs frequently among patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure (CHF). In patients with left ventricular (LV) aneurysms, LV-aneurysm repair (LVAR) reduces LV-size and ameliorates symptoms of CHF, but the incidence of late sudden death is unknown, especially after LVAR without concomitant anti-arrhythmic therapy. METHODS: Between June 1993 and June 1999, 147 patients (70% males; 62+/-9 years) with CHF (median: NYHA III) due to anterior LV-aneurysms underwent LVAR. None of the patients underwent anti-arrhythmic surgical procedures concomitant to LVAR. Ninety percent of the patients had additional myocardial revascularization. Hospital records and laevocardiograms were reviewed, and follow-up information was obtained. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 4.1% (n=6). The median follow-up was 3.7 years (0.1-73.4 months; overall 462 patient-years). At follow-up, the patients had significantly less symptoms than preoperatively (median: NYHA II, P<0.001). Nineteen patients had died (5-year survival rate 78%). Of these late deaths, 84% (n=16) were cardiac-related, among which sudden death was most frequent (n=7). Predictors of sudden death were a bypass graft to the right coronary artery (P=0.0100), ventricular tachyarrhythmias early postoperatively (P=0.0315), and cross-clamp time (P=0.0496). CONCLUSIONS: Although the survival and functional state of most patients were good after LVAR without concomitant anti-arrhythmic surgery, we observed a high incidence of late sudden death, which was-among others-significantly associated with postoperative ventricular tachyarrhythmias. To further improve outcomes, intra- and postoperative anti-arrhythmic therapy is advisable in patients undergoing LVAR.

Histopathological grading of ascending aortic aneurysm: comparison of patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common inherited condition that is often accompanied by ascending aortic aneurysm. A high level of histological wall abnormalities was reported to be present in non-dilated aortas of patients with BAV. In patients with tricuspid aortic valve, there appears to exist a direct relationship between the diameter of the ascending aorta and degree of histopathological aortic wall abnormalities. Whether this situation exists in patients with BAV has not yet been investigated. METHODS: Surgical and medical records of all patients undergoing surgery of the ascending aorta were reviewed. A total of 65 patients was identified in whom an aortic wall specimen was obtained intraoperatively. These specimens were systematically re-evaluated, and graded according to the severity of seven histopathological conditions: fibrosis, atherosclerosis, medionecrosis, cystic medial necrosis, smooth muscle cell orientation, elastic fiber fragmentation, and inflammation. RESULTS: BAVs were present in 26 patients (40%). Patients with BAV had significantly less aortic wall alterations than patients with tricuspid aortic valves (p < 0.001) in all variables examined. The severity of aortic wall abnormalities was significantly dependent on aortic diameter in patients with BAV as well as tricuspid aortic valve (p = 0.036 and 0.019), but dependent on age (p = 0.009) only in patients with tricuspid aortic valve. CONCLUSION: The study results provide evidence that ascending aortic aneurysm in patients with BAV differs clinically and histologically from that in patients with tricuspid aortic valve. Further studies are needed to elucidate the impact of inherited and acquired aortic wall abnormalities on the development of aneurysms.

Discrepancies between sizer and valve dimensions: implications for small aortic root.

BACKGROUND: Precise labeling of sizer and valve diameters is crucial for optimal valve selection especially in the small aortic root. This study examines the accuracy of manufacturers' markings on small aortic prostheses and sizers. METHODS: Sizer and valve dimensions of 22 different mechanical aortic prostheses (19 to 23 mm) were evaluated by caliper micrometer measurements. RESULTS: Nearly all sizers exceeded their marked dimensions by up to 1.0 mm. Measured tissue annulus diameters for 19-mm-labeled valves varied between 18.3 and 19.6 mm, for 21-mm valves from 20.5 to 21.6 mm, and for 23-mm valves from 22.4 to 23.5 mm, respectively. The orifice areas ranged from 1.5 to 2.06 cm2 for 19-mm valves, from 2.0 to 2.55 cm2 for 21-mm valves, and from 2.4 to 3.09 cm2 for 23-mm valves, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Actual sizer dimensions and tissue annulus diameters of various small mechanical aortic prostheses varied considerably from their marked diameters. These differences should be considered to ensure the optimal prosthesis selection for each patient.