Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 75(5): 276-284, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27538353

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Octylisothiazolinone (OIT) is used as an antifungal agent by the leather industry. OBJECTIVES: To show sensitization to OIT from leather, and to highlight the potential implications when cross-reactivity between OIT and methylisothiazolinone (MI) is studied. METHODS: Two patients with allergic contact dermatitis caused by a leather belt and shoes, respectively, were patch tested with methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/MI, MI, MCI, OIT, and benzisothiazolinone (BIT). High-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) was used to detect isothiazolinone derivatives in leather goods. Additionally, files of OIT-sensitized patients, observed at the KU Leuven department during the period 1990-2015, were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Both patients had been primarily sensitized to OIT, but the diagnosis in one of them could be achieved only when a higher patch test concentration of OIT (1000 ppm pet.) was used. HPLC-UV confirmed the presence of OIT in their leather goods. Non-relevant sensitization to MI was noted in both cases. Four additional cases of OIT sensitization from leather could be retrieved from the KU Leuven database. CONCLUSIONS: Non-occupational sensitization to OIT from leather may occur. Patch test concentrations of >250 ppm pet. may be necessary for diagnosis, and to show cross-reactivity with MI. Safer use limits for OIT in the leather industry may be needed.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Foot Dermatoses/etiology , Fungicides, Industrial/adverse effects , Shoes/adverse effects , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Abdomen , Adult , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Clothing/adverse effects , Cross Reactions , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patch Tests , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/adverse effects
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 49(6): 281-3, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15025698

ABSTRACT

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by polyvinyl chloride gloves is rarely reported, and in only 2 cases was bisphenol A considered to be the responsible sensitizer. We report a patient with occupational hand dermatitis after the use of a new type of high-density vinyl (HDV) gloves. Patch tests showed positive (++) reactions to both used and new HDV gloves and to bisphenol A. Chemical analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry demonstrated the presence of bisphenol A in the HDV gloves. Replacement by nitrile rubber gloves resulted in complete clearance of the hand dermatitis.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Hand Dermatoses/diagnosis , Phenols/adverse effects , Adult , Benzhydryl Compounds , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/pathology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Gloves, Protective/adverse effects , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/pathology , Humans , Patch Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...