A 12-month extension study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of asoprisnil in women with heavy menstrual bleeding and uterine fibroids.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the safety and efficacy profile during long-term (12-24 months) uninterrupted treatment with the selective progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil, 10 and 25 mg in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) associated with uterine fibroids? SUMMARY ANSWER: Uninterrupted treatment with asoprisnil should be avoided due to endometrial safety concerns and unknown potential long-term consequences. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Asoprisnil was well tolerated in shorter-term studies and effectively suppressed HMB and reduced fibroid volume. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: Women with uterine fibroids who had previously received placebo (n = 87) or asoprisnil 10 mg (n = 221) or 25 mg (n = 215) for 12 months in two double-blind studies entered this randomized uncontrolled extension study and received up to 12 additional months of treatment followed by 6 months of post-treatment follow-up. Women who previously received placebo were re-randomized to either asoprisnil 10 or 25 mg for the extension study. This report focuses on the 436 women who received asoprisnil in the double-blind studies and this extension study. Results for women who previously received placebo in the double-blind studies are not described. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Women ≥18 years of age who completed a 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, had estradiol levels indicating that they were not menopausal and had no endometrial hyperplasia or other significant endometrial pathology were eligible. The safety endpoints were focused on endometrial assessments. The composite primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of women who demonstrated a response to treatment by meeting all three of the following criteria at the final month for participants who prematurely discontinued or at month 12 for those who completed the study: a reduction from initial baseline to final visit of ≥50% in the menstrual pictogram score, hemoglobin concentration ≥11 g/dl or an increase of ≥1 g/dl from initial baseline at the final visit, and no surgical or invasive intervention for uterine fibroids. Other efficacy endpoints included rates for amenorrhea and suppression of bleeding, changes in fibroid and uterine volume and changes in hematologic parameters. No statistical tests were planned or performed for this uncontrolled study. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: Imaging studies revealed a progressive increase in endometrial thickness and cystic changes that frequently prompted invasive diagnostic procedures. Endometrial biopsy results were consistent with antiproliferative effects of asoprisnil. Two cases of endometrial cancer were diagnosed. At the final month of this extension study (total duration of uninterrupted treatment up to 24 months), the primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 86 and 92% of women in the asoprisnil 10- and 25-mg groups, respectively. During each month of treatment, amenorrhea was observed in the majority of women (up to 77 and 94% at 10 and 25 mg, respectively). There was a progressive, dose-dependent decrease in the volume of the primary fibroid with asoprisnil 10 and 25 mg (-55.7 and -75.2% median decrease, respectively, from baseline [i.e. the beginning of the placebo-controlled study] to month 12 [cumulative months 12-24] of this extension study). These effects were associated with improvements in quality of life measures. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study was uncontrolled, which limits the interpretation of safety and efficacy findings. The study also had multiple protocol amendments with the addition of diagnostic procedures and, because no active comparator was included, the potential place of asoprisnil in comparison to therapies such as GnRH agonists and surgery cannot be determined. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Long-term, uninterrupted treatment with asoprisnil leads to prominent cystic endometrial changes that are consistent with the 'late progesterone receptor modulator' effects, which prompted invasive diagnostic procedures, although treatment efficacy is maintained. Although endometrial cancers were uncommon during both treatment and follow-up, these findings raise concerns regarding endometrial safety during uninterrupted long-term treatment with asoprisnil. This study shows that uninterrupted treatment with asoprisnil should be avoided due to safety concerns and unknown potential long-term consequences. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: AbbVie Inc. (prior sponsor, TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc.) sponsored the study and contributed to the design and conduct of the study, data management, data analysis, interpretation of the data and the preparation and approval of the manuscript. Financial support for medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by AbbVie Inc. M. P. Diamond received research funding for the conduct of the study paid to the institution and is a consultant to AbbVie. He is a stockholder and board and director member of Advanced Reproductive Care. He has also received funding for study conduct paid to the institution for Bayer and ObsEva. E. A. Stewart participated as a site investigator in the phase 2 study of asoprisnil and served as a consultant to TAP Pharmaceuticals during the time of design and conduct of the studies while on the faculty of Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. In the last 3 years, she has received support from National Institutes of Health grants HD063312, HS023418 and HD074711. She has served as a consultant for AbbVie Inc., Allergan, Bayer HealthCare AG and Myovant for consulting related to uterine leiomyoma and to Welltwigs for consulting related to infertility. She has received royalties from UpToDate and the Med Learning Group. A.R.W. Williams has acted as a consultant for TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. and Repros Therapeutics Inc. He has current consultancies with PregLem SA, Gedeon Richter, HRA Pharma and Bayer. B.R. Carr has served as consultant and received research funding from AbbVie Inc. and Synteract (Medicines360). E.R. Myers has served as consultant for AbbVie Inc., Allergan and Bayer. R.A. Feldman received compensation for serving as a principal investigator and participating in the conduct of the trial. W. Elger was a co-inventor of several patents related to asoprisnil.C. Mattia-Goldberg is a former employee of AbbVie Inc. and owns AbbVie stock or stock options. B.M. Schwefel and K. Chwalisz are employees of AbbVie Inc. and own AbbVie stock or stock options. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00156195 at clinicaltrials.gov.

Safety and efficacy of the selective progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil for heavy menstrual bleeding with uterine fibroids: pooled analysis of two 12-month, placebo-controlled, randomized trials.

STUDY QUESTION: Can asoprisnil, a selective progesterone receptor modulator, provide clinically meaningful improvements in heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) associated with uterine fibroids with an acceptable safety profile? SUMMARY ANSWER: Uninterrupted treatment with asoprisnil for 12 months effectively controlled HMB and reduced fibroid and uterine volume with few adverse events. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In a 3-month study, asoprisnil (5, 10 and 25 mg) suppressed uterine bleeding, reduced fibroid and uterine volume, and improved hematological parameters in a dose-dependent manner. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: In two Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre studies, women received oral asoprisnil 10 mg, asoprisnil 25 mg or placebo (2:2:1) once daily for up to 12 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Premenopausal women ≥18 years of age in North America with HMB associated with uterine fibroids were included (N = 907). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of women who met all three predefined criteria at 12 months or the final month for patients who prematurely discontinued: (1) ≥50% reduction in monthly blood loss (MBL) by menstrual pictogram, (2) hemoglobin concentration ≥11 g/dL or an increase of ≥1 g/dL, and (3) no interventional therapy for uterine fibroids. Secondary efficacy endpoints included changes in other menstrual bleeding parameters, volume of the largest fibroids, uterine volume and health-related quality of life (HRQL). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In all, 90% and 93% of women in the asoprisnil 10-mg and 25-mg groups, respectively, and 35% of women in the placebo group met the primary endpoint (P < 0.001). Similar results were observed at month 6 (P < 0.001). The percentage of women who achieved amenorrhea in any specified month ranged from 66-78% in the asoprisnil 10-mg group and 83-93% in the asoprisnil 25-mg group, significantly higher than with placebo (3-12%, P < 0.001). Hemoglobin increased rapidly (by month 2) with asoprisnil treatment and was significantly higher versus placebo throughout treatment. The primary fibroid and uterine volumes were significantly reduced from baseline through month 12 with asoprisnil 10 mg (median changes up to -48% and -28%, respectively) and 25 mg (median changes up to -63% and -39%, respectively) versus placebo (median changes up to +16% and +13%, respectively; all P < 0.001). Dose-dependent, significant improvements in HRQL (Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life instrument) were observed with asoprisnil treatment. Asoprisnil was generally well tolerated. Endometrial biopsies indicated dose- and time-dependent decreases in proliferative patterns and increases in quiescent or minimally stimulated endometrium at month 12 of treatment. Although not statistically significantly different at month 6, mean endometrial thickness at month 12 increased by ~2 mm in both asoprisnil groups compared with placebo (P < 0.01). This effect was associated with cystic changes in the endometrium on MRI and ultrasonography, which led to invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in some asoprisnil-treated women. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Most study participants were black; few Asian and Hispanic women participated. The study duration may have been insufficient to fully characterize the endometrial effects. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Daily uninterrupted treatment with asoprisnil was highly effective in controlling menstrual bleeding, improving anemia, reducing fibroid and uterine volume, and increasing HRQL in women with HMB associated with uterine fibroids. However, this treatment led to an increase in endometrial thickness and invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, with potential unknown consequences. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This trial was funded by AbbVie Inc. (prior sponsors: TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc., Abbott Laboratories). E.A. Stewart was a site investigator in the Phase 2 study of asoprisnil and consulted for TAP during the design and conduct of these studies while at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital. She received support from National Institutes of Health grants HD063312, HS023418 and HD074711 and research funding, paid to Mayo Clinic for patient care costs related to an NIH-funded trial from InSightec Ltd. She consulted for AbbVie, Allergan, Bayer HealthCare AG, Gynesonics, and Welltwigs. She received royalties from UpToDate and the Med Learning Group. M.P. Diamond received research funding for the conduct of the studies paid to the institution and consulted for AbbVie. He is a stockholder and board and director member of Advanced Reproductive Care. He has also received funding for study conduct paid to the institution from Bayer and ObsEva. A.R.W. Williams consulted for TAP and Repros Therapeutics Inc. He has current consultancies with PregLem SA, Gedeon Richter, HRA Pharma and Bayer. B.R. Carr consulted for and received research funding from AbbVie. E.R. Myers consulted for AbbVie, Allergan and Bayer. R.A. Feldman received compensation for serving as a principal investigator and participating in the conduct of the trial. W. Elger was co-inventor of several patents related to asoprisnil. C. Mattia-Goldberg is a former employee of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or stock options. B.M. Schwefel and K. Chwalisz are employees of AbbVie and may own AbbVie stock or stock options. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00152269, NCT00160381 (clinicaltrials.gov). TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 7 September 2005; 8 September 2005. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 12 September 2002; 6 September 2002.

Efficacy and safety of leuprolide acetate 6-month depot for suppression of testosterone in patients with prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new leuprolide acetate 45 mg 6-month depot formulation in 151 men with prostate cancer who received 2 intramuscular injections administered 24 weeks apart. METHODS: The primary efficacy measurement was the proportion of patients achieving suppression of serum testosterone to ≤ 50 ng dl(-1) from week 4 through week 48. Adverse events (AEs) and hormonal and safety laboratory values were monitored. RESULTS: The primary efficacy end point was achieved in 93.4% of subjects (95% confidence interval (89.2%, 97.6%)). There were nine escapes from testosterone suppression during the study, none of which were accompanied by a rise in PSA. By week 4, mean testosterone concentration was suppressed below castrate levels to 15.9 ng dl(-1); suppression was maintained for the entire 24-week duration of each depot injection. No mean increase in testosterone was observed after the second injection. Mean PSA levels were maintained below 3 ng ml(-1) from week 14 through the 48-week treatment period. The most frequent AE was flushing (58.3%). Injection site reactions were reported in 24.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Leuprolide acetate 45 mg 6-month depot demonstrated rapid and sustained testosterone suppression through 12 months and was well tolerated. This 6-month leuprolide acetate depot will decrease the number of annual injections in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Absence of immunogenicity of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin in humans.

Diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin (DCLHb) is an intramolecularly cross-linked hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier being developed as a therapy for acute blood loss. We report here the absence of immunogenicity of DCLHb in patients enrolled in phase II and III clinical trials of DCLHb. Two very sensitive immunoassays, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a Western blot assay, were developed and validated for this assessment. The DCLHb-antibodies used in these assays were raised in monkeys, had similar affinities for DCLHb and native human hemoglobin (SFHb), and showed cross-reactivity for subunits of DCLHb and SFHb on the Western blot, suggesting that these antibodies were elicited as a xenogenic response to the protein. In the ELISA, the optical density of a patient sample exposed to DCLHb-coated wells was compared with that of the patient sample exposed to carbonate buffer-coated wells; an optical density ratio of 1.4 was established for discriminating between a positive (reactive) or negative DCLHb antibody response. To date, all of the more than 300 patient specimens (preinfusion and postinfusion) from clinical trials have exhibited a ratio of less than 1.4, confirming the lack of preexisting antibodies to DCLHb and clearly showing the absence of DCLHb antibodies after exposure to this new biologic entity. There has been no requirement for use of the confirmatory Western blot assay. Taken together, the results from this study indicate DCLHb is not immunogenic in humans at doses evaluated clinically.

The effects of diaspirin-crosslinked hemoglobin on the assessment of immunohematology profiles.

BACKGROUND: Extensive studies have been conducted on the in vitro effects of diaspirin-crosslinked hemoglobin (DCLHb) in biochemical, hematologic, hemostatic, and blood banking (immunohematologic) methods. The absence of red cell antigens or plasma and/or serum antibodies allows DCLHb to be used as "universal-donor" material. This study evaluates the effects of DCLHb on the accurate assessment of the immunohematologic profile (ABO and Rh blood grouping, antibody screen, and crossmatching). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: DCLHb, 7.4 g per dL in an electrolyte solution, was mixed in vitro with human whole blood, representing the blood types A Rh-positive. A Rh-negative, B Rh-positive, B Rh-negative, O Rh-positive, O Rh-negative, and AB Rh-positive. Two concentrations of DCLHb were tested: 10-percent (0.74 g/dL) and 30-percent (2.22 g/dL). Controls were prepared by adding a 5-percent albumin solution to aliquots of whole blood in volumes equivalent to those used in preparing the DCLHb dilutions. Serum and/or red cell suspensions from these admixed samples were analyzed for their ABO and Rh blood groups, the presence of unexpected antibodies (antibody screen), and compatibility in crossmatch testing. RESULTS: DCLHb added to whole blood in vitro had no effect on the accurate interpretation of the immunohematologic profile. CONCLUSION: DCLHb does not appear to inhibit the true response or crossreact in the analysis of blood grouping, antibody screening, or crossmatching. In addition, the red color of DCLHb (up to 2.22 g/dL) did not obscure the visual reading for agglutination.

Phase I study of the safety and pharmacologic effects of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution (DCLHb) in normal, healthy volunteers. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover study. SETTING: Phase I research facility of a contract research organization. PATIENTS: Twenty-four healthy adult volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution (25, 50, or 100 mg/kg) or equal volume of lactated Ringer's solution was infused on day 1; the alternate solution was infused 6 days later. Laboratory analyses, electrocardiograms, and Holter and telemetry monitoring were performed to assess organ function, pharmacokinetics, and potential toxicity. Vital signs, pulse oximetry, laser Doppler flowmetry, and toe temperature were measured to evaluate diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution's pharmacodynamic effects. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no serious adverse events associated with diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution infusion. Abdominal pain occurred in three subjects after control infusion and in six subjects after diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution infusion; no treatment was required. A dose-related increase in lactic dehydrogenase (LDH)-5 isoenzyme concentrations was observed in 12 subjects after diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution infusion. There were no associated increases in the circulating concentrations of total LDH, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, or alkaline phosphatase. Total serum creatine kinase concentrations increased significantly after infusion of 100 mg/kg of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution; the isoenzyme creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) was not increased, nor were there any abnormal electrocardiogram findings. There were no differences in laser Doppler, pulse oximetry, or toe temperature measurements during or after either infusion. The half-life of diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution was 2.5 hrs for the 25- and 50-mg/kg doses and 3.3 hrs for the 100-mg/kg dose. A dose-related increase in blood pressure occurred with diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution. CONCLUSIONS: Diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution doses of 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg are well tolerated, without evidence of organ dysfunction or toxicity. Diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin solution's pressor effect is without evidence of decreased peripheral perfusion. Further investigations of its use in certain patient populations are warranted.