Propanil (3,4-dichloropropionanilide) particulate concentrations within and near the residences of families living adjacent to aerially sprayed rice fields.

Propanil is widely used as a postemergence herbicide in rice. Because it is typically applied aerially, there is a potential for propanil to drift into and around homes of those living adjacent to rice fields. Propanil has been shown to be immunotoxic in rodent models. The objective of this study was to measure the levels of propanil to which families living adjacent to aerially sprayed rice fields may be exposed. Air levels were sampled by actively and passively collecting propanil in and around the homes of volunteer families living in close proximity to rice fields sprayed with propanil. Homes ranged from 73 m to 113 m from treated rice fields. Sampling was conducted in the home, adjacent to the home (within 5 m of the home), 30 m from the home, and at the edge of the rice field. Concentrations were determined via gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy. Propanil levels adjacent to the homes ranged from nondetectable to 1,106.4 microg per 400 cm2 collection surface (2.0 microg detection limit). Wind direction and wind velocity were the primary determinants of propanil drift. At sites where the prevailing wind was blowing away from the home, no propanil was detected except at the edge of the field. Distance from the edge of the rice field also influenced the amount of drift with higher levels measured at 30 m from the house than adjacent to the house. No propanil vapor was detected on absorbent media sampled in and around the homes. The results indicate that individuals living adjacent to rice fields aerially sprayed with propanil are potentially exposed to variable amounts of propanil, and wind speed and direction are the most important factors that influence the concentration of aerially applied pesticide.

Recovery of atrazine, bromacil, chlorpyrifos, and metolachlor from water samples after concentration on solid-phase extraction disks: interlaboratory study.

An interlaboratory comparison was conducted in 1997 and 1998 to examine the feasibility of using C18 solid-phase extraction disks (Empore) to simultaneously determine the herbicides atrazine, bromacil, and metolachlor and the insecticide chlorpyrifos in water samples. A common fortification source and sample processing procedure were used to minimize variation in initial concentrations and operator inconsistencies. The protocol consisted of paired laboratories in different locations coordinating their activities and shipping fortified water samples (deionized or local surface water) or Empore disks on which the pesticides had been retained and then quantitating the analytes by a variety of gas chromatographic methods. Average recoveries from all laboratories were >80% for atrazine, bromacil, and metolachlor, and >70% for chlorpyrifos. Detection of bromacil was unachievable at some locations because of chromatographic problems. Shipping samples between cooperating laboratories did not affect the recovery of atrazine, chlorpyrifos, or metolachlor in either matrix. Recoveries tended to be higher from disks shipped to cooperating laboratories compared with those from fortified water. Shipping disks eliminated many problems associated with the shipment of water samples, such as bottle breakage, higher shipping cost, and possible pesticide degradation. Recoveries of bromacil and metolachlor were lower from fortified surface water samples than from fortified deionized water samples. This collaborative research demonstrated that pesticides in water samples can be concentrated on solid-phase extraction disks at one location and quantitated under diverse analytical conditions at another location. The extraction efficiencies of the disks were comparable with or better than the recoveries obtained from the shipped water samples, and the problems associated with shipping water samples were eliminated by using the disks.

Measurements of year-long exposure to tree nursery workers using multiple pesticides.

A year-long nurseryworker pesticide exposure study was designed to measure and evaluate the exposure occurring to workers who had the potential for simultaneous exposure to multiple pesticides. This four-State study was conducted in five nurseries (four USDA Forest Service and one State) involved in conifer seedling production. Primary comparisons were made among nursery workers in the Pacific northwest and south central United States. Worker exposure was assessed by using patches attached to clothing, handrinse samples and urine excreted from potentially exposed workers. In addition, dislodgeable residue in rinsate from a water wash of pesticide-treated seedlings was also evaluated. Four different groups of field workers, designated as applicators, weeders, scouts and packers, were included. The pesticide absorbed dose, assessed by urine analysis of pesticide metabolites and the deposition of pesticide on patches attached to the clothing of field workers, was monitored as they performed their duties under normal conditions (e.g., typical clothing, pesticide application). Monitoring was performed for the 14 different pesticides which were used in these nurseries. Seven pesticides were studied in more detail using biological monitoring. For these compounds, metabolites known to be excreted in the urine of exposed humans or other mammals were used to estimate the dose of pesticide absorbed by the exposed workers. The highest percentage of positive samples came from dislodgeable residue samples (8.3%) followed by patch samples (3.2%), handrinse (2.9%), and urine samples (1.3%). To summarize the conclusions from the urinary excretion data, 12 of the 73 nursery workers in the study received a low absorbed dose of pesticide. Biological monitoring revealed that three pesticides (benomyl, bifenox and carbaryl) were found in the urine of some of the workers. Of the 3,134 urine samples analyzed there were 42 positive; 11 urine samples were positive for benomyl, while bifenox was responsible for 13 positives and carbaryl accounted for the remaining 18. The 12-week continuous monitoring of urine showed that metabolites of these materials were rapidly excreted; thus, no build-up in the body is anticipated. Margins of Safety (MOS) calculations were made to provide an assessment of the significance of the exposure. Based on the low frequency of positive urine samples in the study, the low levels of metabolites when they were found, their apparent rapid excretion rate and the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) data, furnished from other sources, nursery worker exposure to pesticides in these conifer nurseries is below health threatening levels.

Progress in pesticide exposure studies and future concerns.

A campaign to educate the public regarding the merits of pesticides is necessary if we are to overcome the widespread poor image of pesticides that exists in society today. A comparison of biological monitoring and measurements of pesticide deposition on patches suggests that since only the absorbed dose has any potential for adverse health effects if forced to choose one technique over the other, more emphasis should be placed on biological monitoring. Controlled human pesticide exposure and dermal absorption studies establishing pharmacokinetic data are necessary if scientists and regulatory officials are expected to make knowledgeable worker safety recommendations pertaining to the pesticides being used today. Worker exposure can continue beyond the application day if pesticide-contaminated boots or gloves are used later. Excretion rate of 2,4-D in human urine was not affected by the presence of picloram in the application mixture. Margins of safety guidelines are highly dependent on adoption of appropriate no observed effect levels (NOEL).