Racial and Ethnic Differences in Distress, Depression, and Quality of Life in people with hemophilia.

Hemophilia-related distress (HRD) has been shown to be higher among those with lower educational attainment, but potential racial/ethnic differences have not been previously described. Thus, we examined HRD according to race/ethnicity. This cross-sectional study was a planned secondary analysis of the hemophilia-related distress questionnaire (HRDq) validation study data. Adults aged ≥ 18 years with Hemophilia A or B were recruited from one of two hemophilia treatment centers between July 2017-December 2019. HRDq scores can range from 0-120, and higher scores indicate higher distress. Self-reported race/ethnicity was grouped as Hispanic, non-Hispanic White (NHW) and non-Hispanic Black (NHB). Unadjusted and multivariable linear regression models were used to examine mediators of race/ethnicity and HRDq scores. Among 149 participants enrolled, 143 completed the HRDq and were included in analyses. Approximately 17.5% of participants were NHB, 9.1% were Hispanic and 72.0% were NHW. HRDq scores ranged from 2 to 83, with a mean of 35.1 [standard deviation (SD) = 16.5]. Average HRDq scores were significantly higher among NHB participants (mean = 42.6,SD = 20.6; p-value = .038) and similar in Hispanic participants (mean = 33.8,SD = 16.7, p-value = .89) compared to NHW (mean = 33.2,SD = 14.9) participants. In multivariable models, differences between NHB vs NHW participants persisted when adjusting for inhibitor status, severity, and target joint. However, after household income was adjusted for, differences in HRDq scores were no longer statistically significant (ß = 6.0 SD = 3.7; p-value = .10). NHB participants reported higher HRD than NHW participants. Household income mediated higher distress scores in NHB compared to NHW participants, highlighting the urgent need to understand social determinants of health and financial hardship in persons with hemophilia.

Cross-sectional study evaluating the association of haemophilia-related distress and clinically relevant outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: In chronic diseases, disease-related distress can impact disease outcomes. Distress and haemophilia-related distress has been demonstrated in people with haemophilia (PwH). The association of haemophilia-related distress on disease outcomes among PwH is unknown. AIM: To study the association of haemophilia-related distress with haemophilia specific outcomes, including adherence to prophylactic therapy, the presence of a target joint, healthcare utilization and work-impairment. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, adults with haemophilia A or B were enrolled in a study to validate the haemophilia-related distress questionnaire (HRDq). In this planned analysis, univariate and multivariate associations between the HRDq total score and disease outcomes were explored. RESULTS: The 114 participants in this analysis were male, mostly with haemophilia A (92%) and severe disease (52%) with a median age of 31.9 years. On univariate analysis, HRDq total score (5-point change) was associated with the presence of a target joint (P = .002), high healthcare utilization (P = .011), poor adherence (P = .033) and work-impairment (P ≤ .001). After adjustment for age, race, severity and other potential confounders, adherence (aß 0.33, 95% CI .17, .49) and work-impairment (aß 4.69, 95% CI 3.27-6.1) remained statistically significantly associated with HRDq total score. CONCLUSION: Haemophilia-related distress is associated with poor adherence to factor prophylaxis and work-impairment. The direction of the association (causation) is yet to be determined and requires future study.

An evaluation of PROMIS health domains in adults with haemophilia: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) provides measures of health status that assess physical, mental and social well-being from the patient perspective. PROMIS measures are used in clinical practice and research across various patient populations but are not yet validated among patients with haemophilia. AIM: Evaluate the sensitivity of PROMIS to indicators of haemophilia clinical severity and compare PROMIS measures to those from other PRO instruments. METHODS: Male adults with haemophilia (n = 115) completed the PROMIS-29 short form which includes 4 questions for each of 7 domains: depression, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, physical function, pain interference, fatigue and sleep disturbance. Participant responses for each domain were scored on a T-score metric with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 based on the original PROMIS reference sample of US adults. Participants also completed other generic and haemophilia-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires. RESULTS: Participants who experienced higher pain and depression levels reported significantly worse health in every PROMIS domain compared with their peers. Those who had recently needed to use crutches, visit an emergency department or were currently unemployed or disabled also reported poor PROMIS scores on most domains. Construct validity was supported by correlations between PROMIS domain scores and domain scores reported using the EQ-5D-5L and Haem-A-QoL. CONCLUSION: The PROMIS instrument provides a potentially valuable tool to evaluate the impact of haemophilia and suggests usefulness in research and clinical practice.

Validation of a new instrument to measure disease-related distress among patients with haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with haemophilia, general psychological distress as measured by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) distress thermometer has been associated with pain, disability and increased healthcare utilization. AIMS: To develop and validate a measure of haemophilia-related distress. METHODS: After qualitative interviews, the Hemophilia-Related Distress Questionnaire (HRDq) was developed. To validate the HRDq, adults (≥18 years) with haemophilia were enrolled, reported demographic and clinical information, and completed the HRDq and other questionnaires that measured similar constructs. Analysis included factor analysis and assessment of internal consistency using Cronbach's α, convergent validity using Pearson's correlation coefficient, and discriminant validity by comparing subgroups of patients. Test-retest reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Among 130 enrolled participants, 126 (median age=32.7 years) completed the 24 item HRDq in a median time of 5.4 minutes with overall HRDq scores ranging from 2 to 83 (median score=31.5; higher scores indicating higher distress). Assessment of convergent validity demonstrated a strong correlation (ρ>.60) of the HRDq total score with the NCCN Distress Thermometer, Haem-A-QoL total Score, and PROMIS-29 Profile social role domain and a mild to moderate correlation with all other questionnaire domains (.3-.59, p < .05). Distress was higher among those who had less education, were not employed, and were disabled and was not significantly different among those with severe compared with non-severe disease. Assessment of test-retest reliability demonstrated an ICC value of .84 (95% CI .71-.91) for the total score. CONCLUSIONS: The HRDq demonstrates good internal consistency, construct and discriminant validity, and retest reliability with a low responder burden.

The effect of psychological distress on health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Distress effects are widely examined in cross-sectional studies with less known about effects on future health. This review summarizes distress impacts on health among adults in prospective studies and describes available distress measurement tools. Four inter-disciplinary databases were searched. Effects of distress on mortality and other outcomes were reviewed and estimated in a meta-analysis. A total of 19 studies were assessed which incorporated 10 distress tools. Distress had a detrimental effect on health regardless of the population studied, distress tool used, and health outcome examined. There was an increased mortality risk among those reporting high versus low distress (pooled hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.29 (1.15-1.46)).

Disease-related distress among adults with haemophilia: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: Distress related to disease burden has been defined and described among people with chronic diseases including diabetes and cancer. In these populations, disease-specific distress is associated with health outcomes. Haemophilia-related distress is less understood. AIM: To identify qualitative features of haemophilia-related distress among affected adults to ultimately inform the creation of a measurement tool. METHODS: Adults with haemophilia A or B associated with a large haemophilia treatment centre in the south-eastern U.S. were recruited to participate in this qualitative study. Fifteen participants completed semi-structured telephone interviews. Interviews lasted 1-2 hours and explored experiences of distress related to various aspects of haemophilia. Interviews were audio taped, transcribed and coded using NVIVO, software for organizing, managing and analysing qualitative data. Coding was deductive and inductive, and the analysis was thematic. RESULTS: Haemophilia-related distress was broadly related to feelings of isolation and vulnerability which incorporated health system factors, physical functioning, caretaker roles and psychological considerations. Specific features associated with haemophilia-related distress included lack of trust in the knowledge of haemophilia and care provided by staff in community healthcare settings, concerns about the future such as health insurance access and ageing/disability, long-standing feelings of being different from others and feeling like an outsider, treatment burdens and fear of acute bleeds. Protective factors included supportive relationships with family, friends and haemophilia care teams through which participants received practical and emotional support. CONCLUSION: Features of haemophilia-related distress were identified. Results will facilitate distress measurement and intervention efforts to reduce distress in adults with haemophilia.

Exploring changes in distress among individuals with bleeding disorders: What is linked to improvements in distress?

Adults with chronic bleeding disorders report high distress, but it is unclear how distress varies over time. Patients rated their distress on a 10-point scale at two clinic visits. Of 83 patients, roughly one-quarter reported consistent no/low distress (29%), one-quarter reported consistent distress (22%), and half (49%) reported a change in distress of at least two points. Overall activity levels, depressive symptoms, and non-White race were significantly associated with worsening and consistent distress in adjusted analyses while improvements in activity levels and depressive symptoms during the study period were associated with distress improvement. Our results suggest that distress is modifiable.