Congenital anomaly rate in offspring of mothers with diabetes treated with insulin lispro during pregnancy.

AIM: To determine the rate of major congenital anomalies in offspring of a large group of women with diabetes mellitus treated with insulin lispro (Humalog). METHODS: This multinational, multicentre, retrospective study included mothers with diabetes mellitus (diagnosed prior to conception) who were treated with insulin lispro for at least 1 month before conception and during at least the first trimester of pregnancy. Anomalies were assessed by two independent dysmorphologists not affiliated with the sponsor. RESULTS: The charts of 496 women were reviewed for 533 pregnancies resulting in 542 offspring (500 live births, 31 spontaneous and seven elective abortions, and four stillbirths). Mothers' characteristics: mean (+/- SD) age was 29.9 (+/- 5.2) years, 85.6% were Caucasian and 97.2% had Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Insulin lispro continued to be the main mealtime insulin for more than 96% of the women during the second and third trimester. The dysmorphologists determined that 27 (5.4%) offspring had major congenital anomalies and 2 (0.4%) offspring had minor congenital anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of major congenital anomalies was 5.4% [95% CI (3.45%, 7.44%)] for offspring of mothers with diabetes mellitus treated with insulin lispro before and during pregnancy. The current published rates of major anomalies in infants born to mothers with diabetes treated with insulin are between 2.1 and 10.9%. This suggests that the anomaly rate with insulin lispro treatment does not differ from the published major congenital anomaly rates for other insulin treatments.

Humalog Mix50 before carbohydrate-rich meals in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: To compare pre-meal injection of Humalog Mix50 (Mix50) and Humalog Mix25 (Humalog Mix75/25 in the US; Mix25) with respect to 2 h postprandial (2 h pp) blood glucose (BG) control after a carbohydrate-rich breakfast in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients were enrolled in a 16-week crossover trial and received two treatment regimens in a randomized crossover fashion: (i) Mix50 before breakfast and Mix25 before the evening meal (Mix50/Mix25) and (ii) Mix25 before both breakfast and the evening meal (Mix25 twice daily). Insulin doses were adjusted according to stated glycaemic targets. After 6 and 8 weeks of treatment, the patient's usual morning insulin dose was administered, followed immediately by a test breakfast representative of the patient's usual breakfast meal. Fasting and 2 h pp BG concentrations were measured at the time of the test meal. Haemoglobin A1c (A1C) was measured, and information regarding hypoglycaemia (symptoms) was collected at the end of each treatment period. RESULTS: Insulin doses were similar between treatments (morning = 31-33 U, evening = 26-28 U) at endpoint. Following the test breakfast, the 2 h pp BG was lower (10.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/l vs. 12.4 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, p = 0.0012) and the 2 h pp BG excursion was smaller (1.4 +/- 0.28 mmol/l vs. 3.5 +/- 0.28 mmol/l, p < 0.001) during treatment with Mix50/Mix25 than during treatment with Mix25 twice daily. There was no difference between the treatments with respect to fasting BG (Mix50/Mix25, 9.5 +/- 0.3 mmol/l vs. Mix25 twice daily, 8.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; p = NS), A1C (8.14% +/- 1.14% vs. 8.14% +/- 1.07%; p = NS) or the incidence of self-reported hypoglycaemia (34% vs. 23%; p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with treatment with Mix25 twice daily, treatment with Mix50 before breakfast and Mix25 before the evening meal resulted in better pp glycaemic control following a carbohydrate-rich meal, and similar fasting BG, A1C and incidence of hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

A comparison of insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 in the treatment of type 2 diabetes during Ramadan.

OBJECTIVE: To compare insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 with regard to their effect on morning and evening postprandial glucose (PPG) control, and on average daily blood-glucose (BG), in patients with Type 2 diabetes who wish to fast during Ramadan. METHOD: Insulin lispro Mix25 and human insulin 30/70 were compared in an open-label, multicenter, randomised, crossover study involving 151 patients. Each treatment period had a duration of 14 days during which the patients self-monitored their BG before and 2 h after the main meals on any 3 days within the last 5 days of each treatment period. RESULTS: The 2 h PPG excursion following the main evening meal after sunset was significantly lower with insulin lispro Mix25 (3.4+/-2.9 mmol/l) compared with human insulin 30/70 (4.0+/-3.2 mmol/l, P=0.007). The evening pre-meal fasting BG values were also lower with insulin lispro Mix25 (7.1+/-2.2 mmol/l) versus human insulin 30/70 (7.5+/-2.6 mmol/l, P=0.034). The average daily BG concentration was 9.5+/-2.4 mmol/l during treatment with insulin lispro Mix25 versus 10.1+/-2.5 mmol/l with human insulin 30/70 given in identical doses (P=0.004). CONCLUSION: When compared with human insulin 30/70, treatment of insulin-requiring Type 2 patients with insulin lispro Mix25 during Ramadan resulted in better average daily glycaemia, and better BG control before and after the evening meal. Insulin lispro Mix25 should be considered as a therapeutic option during Ramadan.

A pilot programme of MRSA surveillance in India. (MRSA Surveillance Study Group).

This surveillance study was conducted simultaneously at three centres across India. A total of 13,610 test samples from various sites were obtained. Microbiological methods employed were similar at the three centres. Identification of S aureus was based on the recognition of the production of coagulase with positive isolates being recorded as S aureus. Both tube coagulase tests and slide coagulase test were performed. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the isolated strains of staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcus epidermidis to various antimicrobial discs were carried out according to standardized disk diffusion method recommended by NCCLS. Of the total 739 cultures of S aureus, 235 (32%) were found to be multiply resistant with the individual figures for resistance being 27% (Bombay), 42.5% (Delhi) and 47% (Bangalore). MRSA is emerging to be a significant problem pathogen in the surgical setting with vancomycin probably the only reliable choice for these infections.