ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To identify sustained differences in intraocular pressure (IOP) after intravitreous injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs. DESIGN: Database study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients seeing an ophthalmic provider who contributes to the database. METHODS: We identified a total of 23 776 unique patients who received only a single type of anti-VEGF medication (bevacizumab, aflibercept, or ranibizumab) by injection in the right eye in the American Academy of Ophthalmology Intelligent Research in Sight Registry. Subgroups included patients with age-related macular degeneration only and patients who had not received an anti-VEGF injection for at least 1 year before the study. We examined those with at least 12, 18, and 25 injections for each of these 3 medications. For all groups, we used fellow, untreated eyes for comparison. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The mean change in IOP from baseline at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up and the proportion of eyes with a clinically significant IOP increase (defined as sustained rise of at least 6 mmHg to an IOP of more than 21 mmHg). RESULTS: All patients in all groups receiving all drugs showed a decrease in IOP from baseline, with a mean of 0.9 mmHg in treated eyes compared with an average decrease of 0.2 mmHg in fellow untreated eyes, a statistically significant difference. A generalized linear model accounting for confounders associated bevacizumab with slightly less lowering of IOP than aflibercept and ranibizumab in most subgroups. A clinically significant IOP increase was seen in 2.6% of eyes receiving injections compared with 1.5% in the associated untreated fellow eyes. Clinically significant IOP increases occurred at a rate of 1.9%, 2.8%, and 2.8% for aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab, respectively, which was significantly higher than untreated fellow eyes for bevacizumab and ranibizumab, but not for aflibercept. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses from real-world data indicate that anti-VEGF intravitreous injections are associated with a small but statistically significant decrease in IOP over time. A proportion of patients, on average 2.6%, experienced a sustained clinically significant IOP rise with these drugs overall compared with 1.5% in the fellow untreated eyes. However, such an increase was not seen with aflibercept.
