Association between Oro-Facial Defects and Systemic Alterations in Children Affected by Marfan Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: It is important to establish an early diagnosis of the Marfan Syndrome (MFS) for providing an adequate pharmacological or surgical therapy. Nevertheless, this diagnosis may be complex, given the multi-organic involvement of this disease. AIMS: In this work, we evaluated the oral phenotype in a group of paediatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of MFS, to quantify the association of the oro-facial defects with other systemic alterations. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Paediatric subjects who were aged, with a clinical diagnosis of MFS, were selected from our regional Marfan monitoring unit. METHODS AND MATERIAL: All the patients were subjected to Paediatric Dentistry examinations and a radiological screening with Panoramic and Cephalometric X-Rays. The aortic dilation (Aortic Z-score value), the hyperlaxity of the ligaments and scoliosis were evaluated by cardio-surgical and orthopaedics specialists. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The correlations between the oral and systemic alterations were analyzed by using the chi square test for the nominal variables. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant correlation of the Aortic Z - score with multiple oral defects which included retrognathia, malar hypoplasia, cross bite, oral respiration and an ogival palate. An association of the oral defects with hyperlaxity of the ligaments and scoliosis was also found. Thus, the data suggested that dentists should be more involved in a multidisciplinary approach, to provide an early MFS diagnosis in paediatric patients.

Salivary miRNAome profiling uncovers epithelial and proliferative miRNAs with differential expression across dentition stages.

Saliva's ability to mirror the internal physiological environment of an organism coupled with its facile accessibility makes it an attractive diagnostic medium. The finding of microRNAs (miRNAs) in saliva has expanded the field of biomarker discovery since these tiny non-coding RNAs affect various physiological processes and diseases. Few reports have linked miRNAs to tooth development and eruption, with none having studied this in humans. As a first initiative to describe miRNAs in saliva whose modulations may reflect developing and erupting teeth, we quantified the levels of 730 miRNAs in the saliva of children of varying dentition stages: edentulous (newborns), deciduous and permanent by megaplex stemloop reverse-transcription quantitative PCR. The three groups expressed 193, 181 and 192 miRNAs, respectively, where 125 miRNAs had consistent expression. The remaining miRNAs had inter-group variations from 5 to hundreds of fold, where most had either an increasing or decreasing trend in going from edentulous to deciduous to permanent. A literature survey of epithelial miRNAs found most were present in saliva. Moreover, many miRNAs with expression differences between groups had previously documented functions in proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis and other cellular behaviours key to the dynamics of tooth morphogenesis. Lastly, miRNAs of the same family, such as the let-7 and miR-200 families, or transcribed from the same hairpin, had similar expression patterns. The results presented here should serve as a salivary miRNA dictionary for future studies in tooth development as well as in childhood diseases associated with modulations in saliva composition.

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three commercially available toothpastes on dentin hypersensitivity reduction: an eight-week clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this eight-week, single-center, three-cell, double-blind, and randomized clinical study was to evaluate the dentin hypersensitivity reduction efficacy of three commercially available toothpastes: 1) Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief Toothpaste (also marketed as elmex Sensitive Professional); 2) Sensodyne Rapid Relief Toothpaste; and (3) Crest Cavity Protection Toothpaste. METHODS: 150 subjects, having two teeth with tactile and air blast hypersensitivity, were assigned to one of the three study groups (50/group). Subjects were then asked to brush their teeth for one minute, twice daily, with the given toothpaste. The dentin hypersensitivity and oral tissues were evaluated at baseline, two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks. Comparison of the treatment groups with respect to gender was conducted using a chi-square analysis, and with respect to age and baseline hypersensitivity scores was performed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Within-treatment effects were analyzed using the paired t-test, while the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine between-treatment effects. The post hoc Tukey test was performed for pair-wise comparisons. All statistical tests were two-sided using a significance level of alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: After two, four, and eight weeks of daily use of the products, all three groups showed a statistically significant reduction from baseline in tactile and air blast dentin hypersensitivity (p < 0.05). Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief toothpaste produced a significant improvement in mean tactile and air blast dentin hypersensitivity scores, and was more effective than Sensodyne Rapid Relief toothpaste and Crest Cavity Protection toothpastes (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Colgate Sensitive Pro-ReliefToothpaste, used twice daily, significantly reduces dentin hypersensitivity, and is significantly more effective in reducing dentin hypersensitivity than Sensodyne Rapid Relief Toothpaste and Crest Cavity Protection Toothpaste.

Desensitizing efficacy of a new toothpaste containing 5.5% potassium citrate: a 4-week clinical study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the desensitizing capabilities of a new toothpaste containing 5.5% potassium citrate (Colgate Sensitive Multi Protection Toothpaste) to another toothpaste containing 3.75% potassium chloride (Sensodyne Total Care F Toothpaste). METHODS: A 4-week clinical study was conducted in 75 subjects at the University of Rome, at Tor Vergata, in Rome, Italy, using a double blind, stratified, two treatment design. Tactile sensitivity as well as air blast sensitivity assessment was used to compare the efficacy of the two products. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in tactile sensitivity scores and air blast sensitivity scores between the tested toothpastes at baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks. Both toothpastes provided statistically significant improvement in tactile sensitivity scores and air blast sensitivity scores after 2 weeks of use and 4 weeks of use as compared to baseline scores.