The T-peak-T-end interval as a marker of repolarization abnormality: a comparison with the QT interval for five different drugs.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The T-peak to T-end (TpTe) interval has been suggested as an index of transmural dispersion and as a marker of drug-induced abnormal repolarization. In this study, we investigate the relation between TpTe and the QT interval. METHODS: Electrocardiograms (ECGs) from five different drugs (sotalol, sertindole, moxifloxacin, nalmefene, and Lu 38-135) and from a placebo group were analyzed. Semi-automatic measurements of T-peak, T-end, and QRS onset were obtained. The TpTe/QT ratio was calculated to investigate the proportional relationship of QT and TpTe. RESULTS: Although a significant increase of both TpTe and QT from baseline is apparent with QT-prolonging drugs, the TpTe/QT ratio remained the same at baseline and after drug administration, thus indicating that prolongation of TpTe is just a fractional part of total QT prolongation. In the presence of notched or flattened T-waves, the uncertainty associated with measurement of the TpTe interval increases. The errors in TpTe for individual subjects may be substantial, thus complicating the use of TpTe for follow-up of individuals. CONCLUSIONS: The duration of the QT interval and TpTe are closely related. Drugs appear to prolong the TpTe interval as a predictable fraction of the total QT prolongation.

Cardiac effects of sertindole and quetiapine: analysis of ECGs from a randomized double-blind study in patients with schizophrenia.

The QT interval is the most widely used surrogate marker for predicting TdP; however, several alternative surrogate markers, such as Tpeak-Tend (TpTe) and a quantitative T-wave morphology combination score (MCS) have emerged. This study investigated the cardiac effects of sertindole and quetiapine using the QTc interval and newer surrogate markers. Data were derived from a 12 week randomized double-blind study comparing flexible dosage of sertindole 12-20mg and quetiapine 400-600mg in patients with schizophrenia. ECGs were recorded digitally at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 weeks. Between group effects were compared by using a mixed effect model, whereas assessment within group was compared by using a paired t-test. Treatment with sertindole was associated with QTcF and QTcB interval prolongation and an increase in MCS, T-wave asymmetry, T-wave flatness and TpTe. The mean increase in QTcF from baseline to last observation was 12.1ms for sertindole (p<0.001) and -0.5ms for quetiapine (p=0.8). Quetiapine caused no increase in MCS, T-wave asymmetry, T-wave flatness or TpTe compared to baseline. In the categorical analysis, there were 11 patients (9.6%) receiving quetiapine who experienced more than 20ms QTcF prolongation compared with 36 patients (33.3%) in the sertindole group. Sertindole (12-20mg) was associated with moderate QTc prolongation and worsening of T-wave morphology in a study population of patients with schizophrenia. Although, quetiapine (400-600mg) did not show worsening of repolarization measures some individual patients did experience significant worsening of repolarization. Clinical Trials NCT00654706.

Effect of nalmefene 20 and 80 mg on the corrected QT interval and T-wave morphology: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled, single-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Nalmefene is an orally administered competitive opioid receptor antagonist targeted at reducing alcohol consumption in alcohol-dependent patients. As part of the regulatory requirements for drug approval, the potential of novel compounds for causing unwanted proarrhythmia should be studied in a thoroughly designed clinical QT/corrected QT (QTc) study (International Conference on Harmonisation [ICH] E14 guideline). OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate whether nalmefene 20 and 80 mg/day induced changes in cardiac repolarization biomarkers indicative of proarrhythmia (the QTc interval and T-wave morphology). METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled, single-centre study carried out in a clinical pharmacology unit. The study included 270 healthy male and female subjects (age 18-45 years). The subjects were randomized to a 7-day treatment period of placebo, nalmefene 20 mg/day or nalmefene 80 mg/day, or placebo for 6 days followed by a single dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg on day 7. Serial triplicate ECGs were obtained over a 24-hour period at protocol-defined time-points. The primary protocol-defined endpoint was the largest time-matched baseline- and placebo-adjusted mean difference in the individually heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTcNi) recorded at any of the 12 ECG time-points distributed over a 24-hour period on day 7 of treatment. Secondary endpoints included a similar analysis using the Fridericia- (QTcF) and Bazett-corrected (QTcB) intervals. An explorative analysis included quantitative assessment of T-wave morphology using the T-wave morphology composite score (MCS) to assess for differences between treatment groups and placebo on day 7 of treatment. The frequency of outliers in the QTc intervals, the pharmacokinetics of nalmefene and the tolerability of nalmefene were also assessed. RESULTS: Nalmefene was rapidly absorbed with a time to reach maximum plasma concentration of 2.2 hours and a dose-proportionate relationship between dose administered and exposure. The largest baseline- and placebo-adjusted mean changes from baseline in the individualized QTcNi (primary endpoint) were 5.45 ms (90% CI 1.52, 9.37) and 5.57 ms (90% CI 1.62, 9.52) for nalmefene 20 and 80 mg/day, respectively, with study sensitivity confirmed by the expected largest increase in mean QTcNi of 10.15 ms (90% CI 5.67, 14.63) for moxifloxacin. Quantitative assessment using the T-wave MCS demonstrated the largest baseline- and placebo-adjusted increase in MCS to be non-significantly different from the intra-subject variability of triplicate recordings in the placebo group. No deaths or serious adverse events occurred in the study. CONCLUSION: This thorough QT/QTc study was a negative study in accordance with the ICH E14 guideline, meaning that nalmefene has no clinically relevant effect on the QTc interval and T-wave morphology. The study predicts no concern over proarrhythmia or need for intensive QTc monitoring with the use of nalmefene in clinical practice.

Quantitative analysis of T-wave morphology increases confidence in drug-induced cardiac repolarization abnormalities: evidence from the investigational IKr inhibitor Lu 35-138.

This study investigates repolarization changes induced by a new candidate drug to determine whether a composite electrocardiographic (ECG) measure of T-wave morphology could be used as a reliable marker to support the evidence of abnormal repolarization, which is indicated by QT interval prolongation. Seventy-nine healthy subjects were included in this parallel study. After a baseline day during which no drug was given, 40 subjects received an I(Kr)-blocking antipsychotic compound (Lu 35-138) on 7 consecutive days while 39 subjects received placebo. Resting ECGs were recorded and used to determine a combined measure of repolarization morphology (morphology combination score [MCS]), based on asymmetry, flatness, and notching. Replicate measurements were used to determine reliable change and study power for both measures. Lu 35-138 increased the QTc interval with corresponding changes in T-wave morphology as determined by MCS. For subjects taking Lu 35-138, T-wave morphology was a more reliable indicator of I(Kr) inhibition than QTcF (chi(2) = 20.3, P = .001). At 80% study power for identifying a 5-millisecond placebo-adjusted change from baseline for QTcF, the corresponding study power for MCS was 93%. As a covariate to the assessment of QT interval liability, MCS offered important additive information to the effect of Lu 35-138 on cardiac repolarization.

Beat-to-Beat variability of repolarization determines proarrhythmic outcome in dogs susceptible to drug-induced torsades de pointes.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether increasing or decreasing beat-to-beat variability of repolarization (BVR) would change drug-induced proarrhythmic outcome accordingly. BACKGROUND: Increased variability of repolarization has been suggested as a prelude to proarrhythmic circumstances in experimental and clinical situations. METHODS: The non-cardiovascular, I(Kr)-blocking drug sertindole was administered to anesthetized dogs with chronic atrioventricular block. Three interventions were used to prevent or suppress sertindole-induced torsades de pointes (TdP). RESULTS: Supratherapeutic doses of sertindole (1.0 mg/kg intravenously) induced TdP in 10 of 13 dogs whereas 0.2 mg/kg induced no TdP, despite increases in QT intervals by both doses. The BVR, quantified as short-term variability (STV) from Poincaré plots, was the only parameter that predicted TdP outcome (1.0 mg/kg sertindole: 2.3 +/- 0.7 ms to 5.1 +/- 2.1 ms, p < 0.05; 0.2 mg/kg sertindole: 2.3 +/- 0.8 ms to 3.2 +/- 1.1 ms, p= NS). INTERVENTIONS: 1) KCl, intravenous, reduced the incidence of sertindole-induced TdP from 6 of 7 to 1 of 7 dogs (p<0.05) and prevented sertindole-related increase of STV: 3.0 +/- 1.1 ms vs. 4.5 +/- 1.3 ms (p < 0.05); 2) levcromakalim (I(K,ATP) activator) reduced sertindole-induced TdP and decreased STV from 4.9 +/- 2.1 ms to 2.6 +/- 0.9 ms (p < 0.05); 3) steady-state ventricular pacing (60 beats/min) abolished sertindole-induced TdP and decreased STV from 4.9 +/- 1.5 to 3.2 +/- 1.0 (p < 0.05). Torsades de pointes reappeared upon return to non-paced idioventricular rhythm. None of the 3 interventions reduced the sertindole-induced prolonged QT interval. CONCLUSIONS: Proarrhythmic intervention is related to an increase in BVR, whereas antiarrhythmic treatment is associated with a decrease in BVR. The BVR is superior to QT interval prolongation in the prediction and prevention of drug-induced TdP in this experimental model.

Assessing the proarrhythmic potential of drugs: current status of models and surrogate parameters of torsades de pointes arrhythmias.

Torsades de pointes (TdP) is a potentially lethal cardiac arrhythmia that can occur as an unwanted adverse effect of various pharmacological therapies. Before a drug is approved for marketing, its effects on cardiac repolarisation are examined clinically and experimentally. This paper expresses the opinion that effects on repolarisation duration cannot directly be translated to risk of proarrhythmia. Current safety assessments of drugs only involve repolarisation assays, however the proarrhythmic profile can only be determined in the predisposed model. The availability of these proarrhythmic animal models is emphasised in the present paper. It is feasible for the pharmaceutical industry to establish one or more of these proarrhythmic animal models and large benefits are potentially available if pharmaceutical industries and patient-care authorities embraced these models. Furthermore, suggested surrogate parameters possessing predictive power of TdP arrhythmia are reviewed. As these parameters are not developed to finalisation, any meaningful study of the proarrhythmic potential of a new drug will include evaluation in an integrated model of TdP arrhythmia.

Electrophysiological safety of sertindole in dogs with normal and remodeled hearts.

Inhibition of the potassium current IKr and QT prolongation are associated with drug-induced torsades de pointes arrhythmias (TdP) and sudden cardiac death. We investigated the cardiac electrophysiological effects of sertindole, an antipsychotic drug reported to prolong the QT interval in schizophrenic patients. In cell cultures, sertindole seemed to be a selective blocker of IHERG over other ion currents. For IHERG, the IC50 value was 64 +/- 7 nM, whereas ISCN5A, ICa,L, ICa,T, IKCNQ1/KCNE1, and IKv4.3 were blocked in the micromolar range. In canine ventricular myocytes, the IC50 value for IKr inhibition by sertindole was 107 +/- 21 nM. Action potentials in these cells prolonged in a reverse rate- and concentration-dependent manner at 10 to 300 nM sertindole. In vivo, sertindole was administered to anesthetized dogs at clinically relevant (0.05-0.20 mg/kg) and high doses (1.0-2.0 mg/kg) i.v. At 0.05 to 0.20 mg/kg sertindole (plasma concentrations 30-157 nM), QTc was prolonged by 1 to 5% in normal dogs and by 9 to 20% in dogs with remodeled hearts due to chronic atrioventricular block (CAVB). TdP was not induced at these doses in normal dogs or in CAVB dogs with reproducible induction of TdP by dofetilide in previous experiments. At 1.0 to 2.0 mg/kg sertindole (plasma concentrations 0.5-3.1 microM), QTc prolonged by 6 to 11% in normal dogs and by 22% in dofetilide-sensitive CAVB dogs. TdP occurred in three of five animals in the latter group. Thus, at high i.v. doses sertindole can pose a serious proarrhythmic risk when electrical remodeling of the ventricles is present. At clinically relevant doses, however, sertindole does not cause TdP in anesthetized dogs with normal or remodeled hearts.