Characterization of tubular functional capacity in humans using para-aminohippurate and famotidine.

BACKGROUND: Renal drug excretion by glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion may be altered by factors such as acute and chronic renal disease, nephrotoxins, and drug interactions. Thus, accurate and reproducible methods for quantitation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and tubular functional capacity are critical. METHODS: We utilized a four-step sequential infusion method to characterize anionic [para-aminohippurate (PAH)] and cationic (famotidine) tubular functional capacity in healthy volunteers. Filtration and secretion rates were quantitated from renal clearance and iothalamate-derived GFR determinations. RESULTS: Concentration-dependent renal clearance of PAH was observed at plasma concentrations> 100 mg/L; renal clearances were 442 +/- 131 (mean +/- SD), 423 +/- 94, 233 +/- 45, and 152 +/- 18 mL/min/1.73 m2 at plasma concentrations of 18 +/- 2, 92 +/- 5, 291 +/- 47 and 789 +/- 28 mg/L, respectively. The apparent affinity (Km) and maximum secretory capacity (TmPAH) were 141 +/- 70 mg/L and 71 +/- 16 mg/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The unbound renal clearance and tubular secretory clearance of famotidine were 384 +/- 70 and 329 +/- 78 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, and were not significantly correlated with the unbound plasma concentrations, which ranged from 126 to 2659 ng/mL. The rate of tubular secretion was linear at unbound plasma concentrations up to 2659 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that a sequential infusion method using PAH may be used to characterize the anionic secretory component of proximal tubular function. The tubular clearance of famotidine may be a suitable index of the cationic secretory capacity of the proximal tubule in humans. Saturation of the cationic secretory pathway was not observed, and further investigation into parallel pathways of cationic secretion, such as p-glycoprotein, may be warranted.

Effect of ceftazidime on systemic cytokine concentrations in rats.

The effect of a single dose of ceftazidime on circulating concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) in a rat model of sepsis was studied. IL-6 concentrations were significantly elevated (100 to 200 times the baseline) 6 h after ceftazidime administration in both septic and nonseptic (control) rats. TNF-alpha concentrations increased significantly in nonseptic (approximately 40 times the baseline) rats but not septic (approximately 2 to 3 times the baseline) rats. Ceftazidime administration was not associated with an increase in endotoxin concentrations. These findings suggest that ceftazidime modulation of proinflammatory cytokine concentrations may be independent of its antimicrobial properties.

Determinants of ceftriaxone clearance by continuous venovenous hemofiltration and hemodialysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To guide individual ceftriaxone dosages in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. DESIGN: Prospective, outpatient study. SETTING: University-affiliated general clinical research center. PATIENTS: Eight patients receiving hemodialysis. INTERVENTION: We performed controlled clearance studies with three hemofilters: an acrylonitrile copolymer 0.6 m2 (AN69), polymethylmethacrylate 2.1 m2 (PMMA), and polysulfone 0.65 m2 (PS). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Subjects received ceftriaxone 1000 mg intravenously before the start of a clearance study. The concentration of ceftriaxone in multiple plasma and dialysate-ultrafiltrate samples was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The diffusional clearances (Cl(diffusion)) and sieving coefficients (SC) of ceftriaxone, urea, and creatinine were compared by a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance with filter and blood, dialysate inflow, or ultrafiltration rate as the main effect and patient as a random effect. The fraction of ceftriaxone bound to plasma proteins was 43 +/- 15% (range 13-92%). Concentration dependence was evident in all three groups. The fraction unbound to plasma proteins (f(up)) at the time that SCs were determined was significantly lower in the PS group (0.16 +/- 0.07) than the AN69 group (0.30 +/- 0.17, p<0.01), but similar to that in the PMMA group (0.27 +/- 0.12). Despite the higher f(up), the SC of unbound ceftriaxone with the AN69 filter (0.48 +/- 0.13) was significantly lower than values for the PMMA (0.86 +/- 0.33) and PS (0.82 +/- 0.22) groups (p<0.05). Continuous venovenous hemofiltration clearance of urea and unbound ceftriaxone increased significantly only for the PMMA (p=0.006) and PS (p=0.015) filters when the ultrafiltration rate was increased. Significant linear relationships (p<0.0001) were observed between Cl(diffusion) of unbound ceftriaxone and clearance of urea for all three filters: AN69 slope = 0.57, PMMA slope = 0.90, and PS slope = 1.02. The slope of this relationship for the AN69 filter was significantly lower than for the other two filters. CONCLUSION: Ceftriaxone clearance was significantly increased and membrane dependent during continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodialysis. Thus individual ceftriaxone dosages for patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapies should incorporate extracorporeal clearance.

Nephrology pharmaceutical care preceptorship: a programmatic and clinical outcomes assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The University of Pittsburgh Nephrology Pharmaceutical Care Preceptorship (NPCP) program was conceived to acquaint health system pharmacists with the pharmacotherapeutic management of dialysis patients, enhance the delivery of pharmaceutical care, and improve clinical outcomes through the development of specialized professional skills. A survey designed to determine the impact of the NPCP program was sent to all 145 participants of the program. METHODS: The survey, designed to collect demographic information and data about the participants' practice sites, professional activities prior to and after the completion of the program, and markers of disease status, was mailed to all participants in September 1997. The 96 respondents (66.2%) were involved in a wide variety of clinical practices; inpatient management of peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis, or renal transplant patients were most commonly reported. RESULTS: More than 80% of the participants believed that the educational content of the NPCP program was sufficient to allow them to establish a specialized service for the management of dialysis patients. However, two-thirds would have preferred to have more contact time (an additional 1-2 d) with the preceptorship faculty. The percentage of the pharmacists' time devoted to the provision of pharmaceutical care for dialysis patients almost doubled, from 13.1% to 25.2% (p < 0.001). The components of pharmaceutical care performed by these pharmacists also changed as a result of their completion of the NPCP program. Time devoted to clinical services and the provision of educational programs (inservices) increased significantly, while the time allocated to distributive activities decreased from a mean of 32.4% to 26.4% (almost 20% from baseline). The number of pharmacists who provided some component of pharmaceutical care for ambulatory dialysis patients increased significantly, from 10 to 33, after completion of the program. In the survey given after the preceptorship, almost 70% of these 33 pharmacists self-reported that the mean hematocrit of their ambulatory dialysis patients increased; 45% reported that the epoetin dose was lower. Parenteral iron use was also reported to have increased in 78.8% of the dialysis units, and an increase in serum ferritin and transferrin saturation was observed in 54.5% and 60.6% of the units. respectively. Although far fewer pharmacists (n = 15) initiated a renal osteodystrophy management program, 73.3% of those who did so reported an increase in their patients' compliance with phosphate binder therapy, which was reflected in a drop in serum phosphorous in 40% of the units. CONCLUSIONS: The NPCP program resulted in changes in the professional activities of the participants: fewer distributive activities and increased clinical and educational activities. These significant changes were noted in all areas of outpatient care. Participation in the NPCP program enhanced the delivery of pharmaceutical care to dialysis patients and improved the markers of disease status.

Determinants of ceftazidime clearance by continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodialysis.

Although several dosage adjustment regimens have been proposed, there is little quantitative information to guide the initiation of ceftazidime therapy in patients who are receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. To determine the clearance of ceftazidime by continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), we performed controlled clearance studies with stable hemodialysis patients with three hemofilters: a 0.6-m(2) acrylonitrile copolymer (AN69; Hospal) filter, a 2.1-m(2) polymethylmethacrylate filter (PMMA; Toray) filter and a 0.65-m(2) polysulfone (PS; Fresenius) filter. Subjects received 1,000 mg of ceftazidime intravenously prior to the start of a clearance study. The concentration of ceftazidime in multiple plasma and dialysate or ultrafiltrate samples was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The diffusional clearances (CI(diffusion)) and sieving coefficients of ceftazidime were compared by a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance with filter and blood, dialysate inflow, or ultrafiltration rate as the main effect and the patient as a random effect. The fraction of ceftazidime bound to plasma proteins was 17%+/-7% (range, 10 to 25%). The clearances of ceftazidime, urea, and creatinine by CVVHD were essentially constant at blood flow rates of 75 to 250 ml/min for all three filters. Significant linear relationships (P<0.0001) were observed between CI(diffusion) of ceftazidime and clearance of urea for all three filters: AN69 (slope = 0.83), PMMA (slope = 0.89), and PS (slope = 1.03). Ceftazidime clearance was membrane independent during CVVH and CVVHD. CVVH and CVVHD can significantly augment the clearance of ceftazidime. Dosing strategies for initiation of ceftazidime therapy in patients receiving CVVH and CVVHD are proposed.

Unintended immunomodulation: part I. Effects of common clinical conditions on cytokine biosynthesis.

Cytokines are low molecular weight proteins that act in an autocrine, paracrine and endocrine fashion to regulate and integrate immune effector cell function. Cytokine production is tightly controlled by a complex network of co-stimulatory and feedback loops. The systemic concentrations of some cytokines, most notably tumor necrosis factor and various interleukins, correlate with the extent of inflammation, and the severity of critical illness and patient outcome. Thus, cytokine expression is often monitored and/or manipulated as a therapeutic target in studies of sepsis and other inflammatory conditions. Unfortunately, some therapies designed to modify cytokine response have failed to improve outcomes in sepsis, and some of these therapies have actually been harmful. Several common clinical conditions, as well as, therapeutic interventions significantly influence cytokine expression. Furthermore, the magnitude and extent of these effects may be greater than those produced by immunomodulating therapies. In contrast, other conditions may not produce clinically significant changes in cytokine expression, and must simply be considered when interpreting studies designed to determine the effects of immunomodulation. Some conditions may even result in changes in the inflammatory response and may thus add to the inflammatory burden of a critically ill patient. This review provides intensivists and other clinicians with an overview of the effects of altered physiologic conditions on cytokine expression. This information is important so that studies measuring cytokines can be correctly interpreted and clinical circumstances in which cytokine manipulation is undesirable can perhaps be avoided.

Unintended immunomodulation: part II. Effects of pharmacological agents on cytokine activity.

Cytokines are proteins that are produced by immune and non-immune cells, and they function as mediators to facilitate cellular communication. Their production is regulated by a complex network of co-stimulatory and feedback loops that responds to a variety of stimuli. Several pharmacological agents have been found to alter systemic concentrations and/or the activity of different cytokines via a variety of mechanisms, including changes in biosynthesis, secretion, and/or stability. Many of the agents that modulate cytokine levels commonly are used in the management of critically ill patients. Catecholamines for example, have been found to promote the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, and, therefore, may alter acute inflammatory processes such as sepsis. Antimicrobials have multiple effects on cytokine production, either secondary to the release of endotoxins from gram-negative bacteria or via direct activity on cytokine expression at the transcriptional and/or post-transcriptional level. Pentoxifylline has multiple effects on the immune system, but inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine release predominates. The reminder of the known drug-cytokine interactions and their effect on the inflammatory process are discussed. Information on the pharmacodynamic effect of drugs is limited, and our understanding of the clinical significance of these observations awaits further investigation. This review was designed to provide intensivists and other clinicians with useful information regarding the effect of medications on cytokine activity. It is also intended to help researchers and clinicians to optimize the design of studies of pharmacotherapeutic modulation of cytokines and to avoid the use of some agents in clinical circumstances in which cytokine manipulation is undesirable.

Evaluation of the influence of diabetes mellitus on antipyrine metabolism and CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 activity.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the metabolism of antipyrine, a general metabolic probe, caffeine, a probe for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and N-acetyltransferase activity, and dextromethorphan, a specific probe for CYP2D6 activity in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study. SETTING: Research facility. Patients. Fifteen patients with type 1 and 16 with type 2 diabetes, and 16 healthy controls. INTERVENTION: Each subject simultaneously received antipyrine 10 mg/kg, caffeine 100 mg, and dextromethorphan 30 mg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of antipyrine and its primary metabolites were determined from saliva and urine samples. Type 1 diabetes had marked effects on antipyrine metabolism whereas type 2 disease did not alter the metabolism of any of the probe drugs. The apparent oral clearance of antipyrine was increased 72% in patients with type 1 disease compared with controls (p=0.0001). In addition, formation clearances of 4-hydroxyantipyrine and 3-hydroxymethylantipyrine were increased by 74% and 137% in those patients relative to controls. The caffeine metabolic index (paraxanthine/caffeine) was increased 34% (p=0.11), and N-acetylation and CYP2D6 phenotype were not altered. CONCLUSION: The metabolism of antipyrine is increased in patients with type 1 diabetes. Based on in vitro reports of antipyrine metabolism and current caffeine metabolic index data, the predominant effect of type 1 diabetes appears to be an increase in CYP1A2 activity. Assessment of the effect of the disease on other specific CYP metabolic pathways is warranted.

Comparison of iothalamate clearance methods for measuring GFR.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bias and precision of three methods of measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) relative to a standard method. DESIGN: Prospective, outpatient study. SETTING: University-affiliated general clinical research center. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients with various degrees of renal function (GFR range 25-151 ml/min/1.73 m2). INTERVENTIONS: Each patient received iothalamate twice during the study visit, first as a bolus injection and then as a priming dose followed by a constant-rate infusion for 2.5 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plasma (ClpIVB) and renal clearances (ClrIVB) after bolus injection and plasma clearance during constant-rate infusion (ClpINF) were compared with standard renal clearance during constant-rate infusion (ClrINF). All three measures were highly correlated with ClrINF (r>0.90, p<0.001). The mean ClrIVB was not significantly different from ClrINF (106.3+/-30.4 vs 104.2+/-28.5 ml/min/1.73 m2) and provided a precise (8.8%, 95% CI 6.5-11.1%) and unbiased measure of GFR. Both ClpIVB and ClpINF were positively biased; values exceeded ClrINF by 11.8+/-11.1 (p=0.0001) and 10.5+/-12.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p=0.0003), respectively. Use of a nonrenal correction factor of 9.8 and 10.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 for infusion and bolus plasma clearance values, respectively, eliminated bias and improved the precision of these methods. CONCLUSIONS: Iothalamate renal clearance after bolus injection is a simple, accurate, and precise measurement of GFR and may be a useful alternative to the standard infusion method in clinical investigations. The corrected plasma clearance provides a simple index of GFR for clinical practice.

Cefazolin as empiric therapy in hemodialysis-related infections: efficacy and blood concentrations.

Concern about the increasing incidence of vancomycin-resistant organisms has tempered the enthusiasm for indiscriminate vancomycin use. Cefazolin has an antibacterial activity profile similar to vancomycin against most pathogens encountered in the hemodialysis (HD) population. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and serum concentrations that were achieved during empiric cefazolin use. Fifteen consecutive HD patients (five, conventional HD; five, high-efficiency HD; and five, high-flux HD) with suspected or documented infections warranting antibiotic intervention, including access-related, respiratory tract, urinary tract, or wound infections, were enrolled. Each patient received intravenous cefazolin (20 mg/kg actual body weight rounded to the nearest 500-mg increment [range, 1 to 2 g]) after each dialysis treatment for at least three doses. Cefazolin concentrations were obtained before and immediately after the next three consecutive dialysis treatments. Thirteen patients were evaluated for efficacy and all 15 were evaluated for toxicity and cefazolin blood concentrations. All patients showed at least a short-term (3-week) clinical resolution of infection with cefazolin treatment. No central nervous system toxicities were noted and no other adverse events were expressed by the patients during the course of cefazolin treatment. Predialysis cefazolin concentrations, as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, were 70.2 +/- 42.7 (conventional HD), 45.6 +/- 18.9 (high-efficiency HD), and 41.6 +/- 23.9 mg/L (high-flux HD) over the three dialysis sessions. Cefazolin at doses of approximately 20 mg/kg administered post-HD appears to be a safe and effective empiric therapy and yields predialysis cefazolin concentrations of 2.5 times or greater than those considered to be the minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint (16 mg/L) for susceptible organisms. These data support the broader use of cefazolin for empiric treatment in the HD population, allowing vancomycin to be reserved for confirmed resistant organisms.

Determinants of vancomycin clearance by continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodialysis.

The clearance of vancomycin is significantly reduced in patients with acute, as well as, chronic renal failure. Although multiple-dosage regimen adjustment techniques have been proposed for these patients, there is little quantitative data to guide the individualization of vancomycin therapy in acute renal failure patients who are receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). To determine appropriate vancomycin dosing strategies for patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), we performed controlled clearance studies in five stable hemodialysis patients with three hemofilters: an acrylonitrile copolymer 0.6 m2 (AN69), polymethylmethacrylate 2.1 m2 (PMMA), and polysulfone 0.65 m2 (PS). Patients received 500 mg of vancomycin intravenously at least 12 hours before the start of the clearance study. The concentration of vancomycin in multiple plasma and dialysate/ultrafiltrate samples was determined by EMIT (Syva, Palo Alto, CA). The diffusional clearance and sieving coefficient (SC) of vancomycin were compared by a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with filter and blood (Q(B)), dialysate inflow (Q(DI)), or ultrafiltration rate (Q(UF)) as the main effects and patient as a random effect. Vancomycin was moderately protein bound in these patients; free fraction ranged from 49% to 83%. The SCs of the three filters were similar and significantly correlated with the free fraction of vancomycin (P = 0.01; r2 = 0.465). Significant linear relationships were observed between the diffusional clearance of vancomycin and Q(DI) for all three filters: AN69 (slope = 0.482; r2 = 0.880); PMMA (slope = 0.853; r2 = 0.966); and PS (slope = 0.658; r2 = 0.887). The slope of this relationship for the PMMA filter was significantly greater than that of the AN69 and PS filters. The clearance of vancomycin, urea, and creatinine, however, was essentially constant at all Q(B)s for all three filters. Thus, the clearance of vancomycin was not membrane dependent during CVVH. However, during CVVHD, membrane dependence of vancomycin clearance was noted at a Q(DI) greater than 16.7 mL/min; vancomycin clearance with PMMA at a Q(DI) of 25 mL/min was 66% and 43% greater than that with the AN69 and PS filters, respectively. CVVH (62% to 262%) and CVVHD (90% to 540%) can significantly augment the clearance of vancomycin in acute renal failure patients. Dosing strategies for individualization of vancomycin therapy in patients receiving CVVH and CVVHD are proposed.

Use of chlorzoxazone as an in vivo probe of cytochrome P450 2E1: choice of dose and phenotypic trait measure.

Chlorzoxazone is being developed and proposed for use as a probe to measure in vivo cytochrome P4502E1 activity, but the phenotypic trait measures that are used vary. Although the doses proposed for phenotyping range from 250 mg to 750 mg, the effect of dose on chlorzoxazone hydroxylation has not previously been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of chlorzoxazone in normal healthy volunteers (N = 6) after single randomized oral doses of 250 mg and 750 mg. An additional 10 volunteers underwent a detailed pharmacokinetic study using the 250-mg dose to further evaluate proposed phenotypic trait measures (N = 16). Timed blood and urine samples were obtained for 10 hours for chlorzoxazone and 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone determination by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were estimated using noncompartmental methods. Evaluation of phenotypic trait measures show that 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone to chlorzoxazone plasma concentration ratios at 2 to 4 hours after drug administration demonstrated the highest correlations with metabolite formation clearance (r = 0.9; P < 0.001). Urine-based parameters (e.g., total recovery) were not significantly related to formation clearance (r = 0.5; P > 0.05). Dose dependency in chlorzoxazone metabolism was shown by a 30% increase (P < 0.05) in the dose-normalized area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of chlorzoxazone and lower incremental dose-normalized urinary recovery of 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone at early timepoints after the 750-mg dose. In addition, the plasma ratio of 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone to chlorzoxazone at 4 hours was reduced by 48% in 5 of 6 subjects after the 750-mg dose (P > 0.05). These data suggest that 6-hydroxylation was saturated at the higher dose and illustrate the importance of dose selection in phenotyping. The results of this study indicate that a chlorzoxazone dose of 250 mg should be used and that a single plasma ratio obtained 2 to 4 hours after dosing is reflective of chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation and thus may serve as a cytochrome P4502E1 phenotypic trait measure.

A primer on continuous renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the multiple continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) techniques available for the management of critically ill adults, and to review the indications for and complications of use, principles of drug removal during CRRT, drug dosage individualization guidelines, and the influence of CRRT on patient outcomes. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (January 1981-December 1996) was searched for appropriate publications by using terms such as hemofiltration, ultrafiltration, hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, medications, and pharmacokinetics; selected articles were cross-referenced. STUDY SELECTION: References selected were those considered to enhance the reader's knowledge of the principles of CRRT, and to provide adequate therapies on drug disposition. DATA SYNTHESIS: CRRTs use filtration/convection and in some cases diffusion to treat hemodynamically unstable patients with fluid overload and/or acute renal failure. Recent data suggest that positive outcomes may also be attained in patients with other medical conditions such as septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and hepatic failure. Age, ventilator support, inotropic support, reduced urine volume, and elevated serum bilirubin concentrations have been associated with poor outcomes. Complications associated with CRRT include bleeding due to excessive anticoagulation and line disconnections, fluid and electrolyte imbalance, and filter and venous clotting. CRRT can complicate the medication regimens of patients for whom it is important to maintain drug plasma concentrations within a narrow therapeutic range. Since the physicochemical characteristics of a drug and procedure-specific factors can alter drug removal, a thorough assessment of all factors needs to be considered before dosage regimens are revised. In addition, an algorithm for drug dosing considerations based on drug and CRRT characteristics, as well as standard pharmacokinetic equations, is proposed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CRRT has expanded to encompass the treatment of disease states other than just acute renal failure. Since there is great variability among treatment centers, it is premature to conclude that there is enhanced survival in CRRT-treated patients compared with those who received conventional hemodialysis. This primer may help clinicians understand the need to individualize these therapies and to prospectively optimize the pharmacotherapy of their patients receiving CRRT.

Validation of the five-drug "Pittsburgh cocktail" approach for assessment of selective regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the probe drugs caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone, debrisoquin (INN, debrisoquine), and mephenytoin can be simultaneously administered as a metabolic cocktail to estimate in vivo cytochrome P450 (CYP) and N-acetyltransferase enzyme activities. METHODS: Fourteen healthy nonsmoking male volunteers (mean age +/- SD, 21.6 +/- 2.2 years) received 100 mg caffeine, 250 mg chlorzoxazone, 100 mg dapsone, 10 mg debrisoquin, and 100 mg mephenytoin individually and in four and five-drug combinations in a randomized manner using a 7 x 7 Latin square. Each drug or drug combination was given orally after an overnight fast, with a minimum 1-week washout between administrations. In each session, urine was collected from 0 to 8 hours and plasma was obtained at 4 and 8 hours after drug administration. Plasma and metabolite concentrations were used to estimate phenotypic trait measures for the efficiency of each drug's metabolism. RESULTS: The phenotypic indexes determined for caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone, debrisoquin, and mephenytoin were not significantly different when given alone than when given in combination. The median percentage change of the trait measures observed during administration of all five compounds compared with individual administration ranged from -10.7% for the 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone to chlorzoxazone plasma ratio to +2.2% for the debrisoquin recovery ratio. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone, debrisoquin, and mephenytoin in low doses can be simultaneously administered without metabolic interaction. This cocktail approach can thus simultaneously provide independent in vivo phenotypic measures for multiple CYP enzymes and N-acetyltransferase.

Drug administration in patients with renal insufficiency. Minimising renal and extrarenal toxicity.

Renal insufficiency has been associated with an increased risk of adverse effects with many classes of medications. The risk of some, but not all, adverse effects has been linked to the patient's degree of residual renal function. This may be the result of inappropriate individualisation of those agents that are primarily eliminated by the kidney, or an alteration in the pharmacodynamic response as a result of renal insufficiency. The pathophysiological mechanism responsible for alterations in drug disposition, especially metabolism and renal excretion, is the accumulation of uraemic toxins that may modulate cytochrome P450 enzyme activity and decrease glomerular filtration as well as tubular secretion. The general principles to enhance the safety of drug therapy in patients with renal insufficiency include knowledge of the potential toxicities and interactions of the therapeutic agent, consideration of possible alternatives therapies and individualisation of drug therapy based on patient level of renal function. Although optimisation of the desired therapeutic outcomes are of paramount importance, additional pharmacotherapeutic issues for patients with reduced renal function are the prevention or minimisation of future acute or chronic nephrotoxic insults, as well as the severity and occurrence of adverse effects on other organ systems. Risk factors for the development of nephrotoxicity for selected high-risk therapies (e.g. aminoglycosides, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ACE inhibitors and radiographic contrast media) are quite similar and include pre-existing renal insufficiency, concomitant administration of other nephrotoxins, volume depletion and concomitant hepatic disease or congestive heart failure. Investigations of prophylactic approaches to enhance the safety of these agents in patients with renal insufficiency have yielded inconsistent outcomes. Hydration with saline prior to drug exposure has given the most consistent benefit, while sodium loading and use of pharmacological interventions [e.g. furosemide (frusemide) dopomine/dobutamine, calcium antagonists and mannitol] have resulted in limited success. The mechanisms responsible for altered dynamic responses of some agents (benzodiazepines, theophylline, digoxin and loop diuretics) in renally compromised patients include enhanced receptor sensitivity secondary to the accumulation of endogenous uraemic toxins and competition for secretion to the renal tubular site of action. Application of the pharmacotherapeutic principles discussed into clinical practice will hopefully enhance the safety of these agents and optimise patient outcomes.

Clinical consequences of nonnarcotic analgesic use.

The accuracy of the economic analysis of the selected adverse events evaluated by McGoldrick and Bailie is questionable. The quantitative perspective on the economics of the adverse events associated with nonnarcotic analgesic use proposed by these authors is limited by the fact that they have combined data on over 30 different NSAIDs into a single value for comparison with two single-entity agents: acetaminophen and aspirin. The relative prevalence of major organ system toxicities varies markedly among the NSAIDs, and this variance invalidates the use of a class conclusion approach. Their conservative incidence estimates, the lack of data in some areas (i.e., hepatic injury), and the exclusion of combination analgesics further limit the utility of their conclusions. However, it is difficult to argue authoritatively that the relative costs of toxicities associated with the three analgesic classes they reviewed are not representative. The ultimate question is, "What is the optimal analgesic for a given patient?" This question can be addressed only if one considers the underlying cause of pain, its chronicity/acuity, the patient's concurrent disease states, if any, and the potential for drug interactions with the patient's concomitant medications. McGoldrick and Bailie concluded on an economic basis that acetaminophen is the analgesic of choice for most patients, including those with impaired renal function. This recommendation is in agreement with those of the Analgesics and the Kidney Ad Hoc Committee of the National Kidney Foundation. It also would seem prudent to use acetaminophen as the first-line agent for those patients in whom aspirin and NSAID use should be avoided or used only with caution along with frequent monitoring of renal function, blood pressure, electrolytes, and/or coagulation status. Thus, there is little to no controversy in their recommendation to initiate treatment with acetaminophen. The authors, however, also suggested that switching patients from an NSAID to acetaminophen would result in significantly decreased costs and morbidity. These authors, however, did not address one key issue that impacts their economic analysis: the relative efficacy of acetaminophen and NSAIDs. If efficacy is similar, then the risk/benefit ratio and economic consequences would favor the use of acetaminophen. However, if many patients are receiving NSAIDs because they did not obtain pain relief with the use of acetaminophen, there would be neither rationale or likely benefit with a change in therapy to acetaminophen. Finally, McGoldrick and Bailie did not evaluate an issue that has perhaps the most far-reaching consequence. Many OTC analgesics are currently marketed as combinations of aspirin, acetaminophen, salicylamide, or caffeine (Table 2). Although the intent of these combinations was [Table: see text] to enhance efficacy while minimizing adverse events, it is now apparent that at least concerning adverse events, the goal was not achieved. Therefore, in light of the markedly higher risk for renal injury with combination analgesics, these agents should be withdrawn from the marketplace. While some might argue that patient education is the key and that addition of an explicit warning on the label of OTC combination products should be an adequate intervention, this agreement is not supported by the Belgium experience. The removal of combination analgesics from the OTC marketplace could be accomplished by governmental action, such as the ban on phenacetin over 10 years ago. Alternatively, pharmacists could no longer sell these products and counsel patients on the rational use of OTC analgesics. The choice among single-entity agents could then be individualized on the basis of patient's current medical status and the adverse event profile of the available agents.

Effects of liver disease on the disposition of the opioid antagonist nalmefene.

OBJECTIVES: The pharmacokinetics of nalmefene and its glucuronide metabolite were investigated in 12 patients with liver disease (four patients with mild, five patients with moderate, and three patients with severe liver disease) and 12 age-, weight-, and gender-matched control subjects. METHODS: Subjects received a single intravenous bolus 2.0 mg dose of nalmefene. Multiple blood and urine samples were collected for 48 hours. Within 1 week of nalmefene administration, antipyrine and galactose clearances were determined as general markers of hepatic metabolism and effective liver plasma flow, respectively. Plasma concentrations of nalmefene were determined by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: The antipyrine and galactose clearance values were 56% and 33% lower, respectively, in the patients with liver disease compared with the normal healthy control subjects. The systemic clearance of nalmefene was reduced by 32% (0.61 +/- 0.21 versus 0.90 +/- 0.27 L/hr/kg [mean +/- SD]) and the terminal elimination half-life was increased by 31% (10.5 +/- 1.9 versus 8.0 +/- 2.2 hours) in the patients with liver disease. This was primarily the result of a 31% reduction (0.181 +/- 0.067 versus 0.263 +/- 0.072 L/hr/kg) in nalmefene glucuronide formation clearance. There were no significant differences in nalmefene volumes of distribution or protein binding. There was a significant inverse relationship between nalmefene clearance and Pugh score (r = -0.57; p = 0.004), indicating decreasing nalmefene clearance with increasing severity of liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: The clearance of nalmefene was significantly reduced in the presence of liver disease. However, because nalmefene will be primarily used in the acute care setting for reversal of opioid-induced effects, it is not likely that these alterations will necessitate a dosage modification.

Disposition of foscarnet during peritoneal dialysis.

OBJECTIVE: To report the disposition of foscarnet in a patient undergoing peritoneal dialysis. CASE SUMMARY: A 34-year-old man with AIDS received foscarnet for the treatment of esophageal cytomegalovirus. We characterized the clearance of foscarnet in this patient during continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). DISCUSSION: The foscarnet half-lives during CCPD and CAPD were 41.4 and 45.8 hours, respectively. These values are significantly greater than the half-life of 4.5 hours observed in patients with normal renal function and about half that reported in anuric patients undergoing hemodialysis during the interdialytic period. The CCPD and CAPD clearances of foscarnet were 5.8 and 4.5 mL/min, respectively; the CAPD clearances of creatinine and urea nitrogen were 4.1 and 6.0 mL/min, respectively. The patient's estimated total body clearance values of foscarnet during CCPD and CAPD were 9.8 and 8.8 mL/min, respectively. Thus, CCPD and CAPD augmented the patient's residual clearance of foscarnet by 145% and 105%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Since incremental increases in residual clearance of 30% or more generally will result in clinically significant changes in a drug's serum concentration, foscarnet dosage needs to be individualized for patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.

The effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of the opioid antagonist nalmefene.

1. The disposition of nalmefene was evaluated in young and elderly normal healthy volunteers. Subjects received either a single 1 mg (n = 18 young; n = 11 elderly) or 2 mg (n = 8 young; n = 15 elderly) intravenous bolus dose of nalmefene. 2. Following the administration of nalmefene, the initial plasma concentrations were significantly higher in elderly vs young subjects. The higher concentrations were the result of the 30 to 40% smaller central compartment apparent volume of distribution that was observed in the elderly subjects as compared with the young volunteers (2.8 +/- 1.1 vs 3.9 +/- 1.11 kg-1 for 1 mg dose). The elderly volunteers also had a significantly shorter distributional half-life (t1/2 lambda 1) than young volunteers (0.7 +/- 0.7 vs 1.3 +/- 0.8 h for 1 mg dose). No significant differences between groups were observed for the elimination half-life, clearance or steady-state apparent volume of distribution. 3. Although transiently higher nalmefene plasma concentrations were observed in the elderly immediately following drug administration, there was no association between this observation and adverse events. We conclude that no dosage alteration is warranted in elderly patients.