Pharmacokinetics, safety and preliminary pharmacodynamic evaluation of DARE-VVA1: a soft gelatin capsule containing tamoxifen for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure safety, systemic pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of a vaginal tamoxifen capsule (DARE-VVA1) among postmenopausal women with moderate-to-severe vulvovaginal atrophy. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 1/2 study of DARE-VVA1, in four doses (1, 5, 10 and 20 mg). RESULTS: Seventeen women were enrolled and 14 completed the 8-week treatment. DARE-VVA1 was safe. All adverse events were of mild or moderate severity and distributed similarly among active and placebo groups. Plasma tamoxifen concentrations were highest among women using DARE-VVA1 20 mg, but the maximum mean (standard deviation) plasma tamoxifen concentrations on day 1 (2.66 ± 0.85 ng/ml) and day 56 (5.69 ± 1.87 ng/ml) were <14% of those measured after one oral tamoxifen dose. Active study product users had significant decreases from pre-treatment baseline in vaginal pH and proportion of vaginal parabasal cells (p = 0.04 for both endpoints), with women randomized to the 10 mg or 20 mg dose experiencing the largest treatment impact. The severity of vaginal dryness and dyspareunia decreased significantly from baseline with active study product use (p = 0.02 for both endpoints). CONCLUSIONS: DARE-VVA1 is safe and results in minimal systemic exposure to tamoxifen. Preliminary efficacy data support further development of this product.

Safety evaluation of 1% tenofovir gel in healthy men.

This study was conducted to determine the safety of tenofovir (TFV) gel, a potential microbicide, following seven consecutive daily penile applications. Eighteen circumcised and 18 uncircumcised healthy men were randomly assigned to TFV gel versus K-Y Jelly in a 2:1 ratio within circumcision group. TFV gel or K-Y Jelly was applied onto the penis at bedtime and washed off 6-10 hours later. Safety was assessed by reported symptoms, findings and laboratory tests. Three of 24 (13%) men in the TFV group reported mild genital symptoms compared with two of 11 (18%) men in the K-Y group. Few mild genital findings were observed and no significant systemic toxicities were reported or observed. TFV gel applied to the penis for seven days was well tolerated locally and systemically and it is unlikely that male partners exposed to small amounts of TFV gel will experience significant genital or systemic toxicity.

Recommendations for the clinical development of topical microbicides: an update.

Topical microbicides are products that are being developed to prevent HIV infection and other sexually transmitted diseases (STD) through topical application to the genital and rectal epithelial surfaces. This paper is an update of the clinical section of a general guidance for the development and evaluation of microbicidal products that was first published by the International Working Group on Microbicides (IWGM) in 1996. (The preclinical section of that document will be updated separately later.) All topical microbicides should be clinically evaluated in humans for safety and effectiveness. Safety studies are necessary to evaluate the potential for systemic absorption and toxicity as well as local toxic effects, such as irritation, ulceration, burning, and itching. Reported symptoms of burning and itching are relevant to future product use and acceptability. Irritation and ulceration of the vaginal, cervical, penile, or rectal epithelium have the potential to result in an increased transmission of HIV and other STD. Effectiveness studies to assess the prevention of HIV infection or STD, depending upon the product indication, are subsequently conducted. These trials need to be large enough to detect clinically meaningful levels of protection. For spermicidal microbicides, additional contraceptive effectiveness studies are also needed.

Cellulose sulfate: tolerance and acceptability of penile application.

Sodium cellulose sulfate (CS) is under development as a vaginal microbicide and spermicide. This was a Phase I, randomized, double-blind study of men to assess acceptability, safety, and degree of penile irritation of seven consecutive daily doses of CS compared to an active control containing nonoxynol-9 (Conceptrol). The data suggest that CS gel is not more irritating to the male genitalia than Conceptrol. This, along with the minimal irritation seen in a Phase I safety study in women following 6 consecutive days of vaginal administration, suggests that CS could be used in future studies, without undue risk, where couples engage in vaginal intercourse. Male volunteers in future studies should be informed that 1 out of 24 participants in the CS group in this study experienced tingling and slight stinging for a brief time after exposure compared with 3 out of 12 in the Conceptrol group who reported similar symptoms.

Single and multiple exposure tolerance study of cellulose sulfate gel: a Phase I safety and colposcopy study.

Vaginally applied gels offer a promising approach for preventing unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections. Cellulose sulfate (CS) is a non-cytotoxic antifertility agent that also exhibits in vitro antimicrobial activity against sexually transmitted pathogens, including HIV. This was a randomized, double-blinded, Phase I study of 2.5 mL and 5.0 mL doses of 6% CS gel. A single vaginal application of the gel followed by five consecutive daily doses was assessed for genital irritation, safety, vaginal leakage, and product acceptability compared to two controls, Conceptrol, which is a marketed contraceptive gel containing nonoxynol-9, and K-Y jelly. The results suggest that the safety of 6% CS was comparable to that of Conceptrol and K-Y jelly, and it may be associated with less genital irritation. The 2.5 mL dose of CS may be preferable according to the participants' reports of leakage. All the products had similar acceptability profiles.

The use of colposcopy in assessing vaginal irritation in research.

Since the early 1990s, colposcopy of the vagina and cervix has been used in the development of vaginal products in order to detect epithelial changes that may increase the likelihood of HIV or acquisition of other sexually transmitted diseases. As part of a continued effort to examine and define the role of colposcopy in a research setting, the Contraceptive Research and Development Program (CONRAD) and the International Working Group on Microbicides (IWGM), in association with the United Nations Program for AIDS (UNAIDS) sponsored a conference entitled, 'The Use of Colposcopy in Assessing Vaginal Irritation in Research', held in Washington, DC in January 1999. This is a report of that conference. The World Health Organization's colposcopy procedure and nomenclature, published in 1995, were reviewed and changes were recommended. The revised procedure involves colposcopic examination of the external genitalia, naked eye examination of the cervix, fornices, and vaginal walls, followed by lavage and colposcopic examination of those areas, and sampling as appropriate for microscopic examination. Revised nomenclature replaces the terms used for findings with descriptions of what is actually seen. Digital video imaging and testing for inflammatory markers may be adjuncts to colposcopy and should be further studied. Other areas requiring additional research include the natural history of colposcopic changes, factors other than product use that may affect colposcopic findings, the clinical significance of findings, and the procedure which best assesses these findings.

Comparative evaluation of three Tactylon(TM) condoms and a latex condom during vaginal intercourse: breakage and slippage.

This study compared breakage and slippage rates of three male condom styles made of Tactylon(TM), a synthetic elastomer, to those of a marketed latex condom during vaginal intercourse. Safety and acceptability outcomes were also assessed. This two-center, prospective, crossover study enrolled 443 couples. Each couple was randomly assigned to use three condoms of each type in one of 24 use sequences. Couples completed questionnaires after using each condom, all of one condom type, and all four condom types. The percentage and standard error (SE, in parentheses) of latex condoms with clinical breakage was 0.86% (0.295). Percentages for Tactylon condoms were not equivalent to the latex study condom, ranging from 3.50% to 4.17%. The percentage and SE of latex condoms with complete slippage was 1.11% (0.328). Percentages for Tactylon condoms were equivalent to those for latex, ranging from 0.70% to 1.31%. The Low-Modulus Tactylon condom was the most preferred. Fewer medical events were reported with the Tactylon condoms than with the latex condom. It was concluded that Tactylon condoms were equivalent to the latex condom in terms of slippage but not breakage. However, safety and acceptability seemed to be better for Tactylon condoms. This may improve consistency of use and may attract new users.

[Vertical distraction osteogenesis of the alveolar process using a tooth-borne device]. / Vertikale Distraktion des bezahnten Alveolarfortsatzes mittels einer zahngetragenen Apparatur.

Since the communication of McCarthy et al. in 1992, applications for distraction osteogenesis in the maxillofacial complex have increased enormously. The advantages as compared to conventional reconstructive procedures are missing donor-site morbidity for bone graft harvesting, reduced blood loss and also a gradual gain in the soft tissue envelope. Meanwhile, even the vertical lengthening of the alveolar process has become a clinically reliable method. The case presented illustrates the treatment of a 16-year-old patient who suffered a sporting accident at the age of 7 years, leading to ankylosis of the upper middle incisors with subsequent underdevelopment of the frontal alveolar process. After fabrication of a custom-made distraction device, an osteotomy of the tooth-bearing segment in the upper front was performed and the segment was attached to the distraction device. Bone lengthening was started on the seventh postoperative day at a daily rate of 0.5 mm. The distraction was maintained until closure of the open bite was achieved. On the 22nd day, the segment was fixed using an orthodontic arch wire and the distraction device was removed. A retention period of 6 weeks was maintained until sufficient stability was detectable. Now, 1.5 years after the treatment, the situation is stable with a good consolidation of the bone fragments and a physiologically shaped gingivobuccal sulcus. Lengthening of the alveolar process by vertical distraction osteogenesis using a tooth-borne device may be indicated in certain cases. With this technique a second operation can be avoided and there is less risk of laceration of dental roots by fixation screws.

A comparative study of the safety and efficacy of FemCap, a new vaginal barrier contraceptive, and the Ortho All-Flex diaphragm. The FemCap Investigators' Group.

The FemCap is a new silicone rubber barrier contraceptive shaped like a sailor's hat, with a dome that covers the cervix, a rim that fits into the fornices, and a brim that conforms to the vaginal walls around the cervix. It was designed to result in fewer dislodgments and less pressure on the urethra than the cervical cap and diaphragm, respectively, and to require less clinician time for fitting. This was a phase II/III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel group study of 841 women at risk for pregnancy. A subset of 42 women at one site underwent colposcopy. Women were randomized to use the FemCap or Ortho All-Flex contraceptive diaphragm, both with 2% nonoxynol-9 spermicide, for 28 weeks. The objectives were to compare the two devices with regard to their safety and acceptability and to determine whether the probability of pregnancy among FemCap users was no worse than that of the diaphragm (meaning not more than 6 percentage points higher). The 6-month Kaplan-Meier cumulative unadjusted typical use pregnancy probabilities were 13.5% among FemCap users and 7.9% among diaphragm users. The adjusted risk of pregnancy among FemCap users was 1.96 times that among diaphragm users, with an upper 95% confidence limit of 3.01. Clinical equivalence (noninferiority) of the FemCap compared with the diaphragm, as defined in this study, would mean that the true risk of pregnancy among FemCap users was no more than 1.73 times the pregnancy risk of diaphragm users. Because the observed upper 95% confidence limit (and even the point estimate) exceeded 1.73, the probability of pregnancy among FemCap users, compared with that among diaphragm users, did not meet the definition of clinical equivalence used in this study. The FemCap was believed to be safe and was associated with significantly fewer urinary tract infections. More women reported problems with the FemCap with regard to insertion, dislodgement, and especially removal, although their general assessments were positive. The two devices were comparable with regard to safety and acceptability, but a 6-point difference in the true 6-month pregnancy probabilities of the two devices could not be ruled out. Further studies are needed to determine whether design modifications can simplify insertion and removal.

The effect of one injection of Depo-Provera on the human vaginal epithelium and cervical ectopy.

Two studies in rhesus monkeys have shown that progesterone implants, Depo-Provera and Norplant, were associated with vaginal thinning. Progesterone implants have also been associated with an increased risk of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) acquisition. This study in 16 women was done to assess vaginal epithelial thickness and number of cell layers from biopsies taken in the untreated follicular and luteal phases, and at 1 month and 3 months after administration of Depo-Provera. There was no significant change over time in either parameter from biopsies obtained in the luteal phase compared with those at either time after Depo-Provera administration. There was also no change in the mean number of Langerhans cells in vaginal wall specimens and no change in cervical ectopy. It appears that women do not respond to exogenous progestins with the dramatic vaginal thinning seen in rhesus monkeys.

PIP: This study assesses vaginal epithelial thickness and number of cell layers from biopsies taken in the untreated follicular and luteal phases and at 1 month and 3 months after administration of Depo-Provera. Subjects were seen at the CONRAD Clinical Research Center at the Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia. Findings showed that there was no significant change over time in either parameter from biopsies obtained in the luteal phase compared with those at either time after Depo-Provera administration. There was also no change in the mean number of Langerhans cells in vaginal wall specimens and no change in cervical ectopy. The dramatic vaginal thinning seen in rhesus monkeys was not observed among these subjects.

Influence of orthodontic treatment in the primary dentition upon development of the dentition and craniofacial growth.

UNLABELLED: Thirty patients who underwent orthodontic treatment of the primary dentition were examined in this retrospective follow-up study. The mean age at the beginning of treatment was 4.4 (+/= 1.1) years, and at follow-up 15.4 (+/- 1.7) years. Different kinds of malocclusion were present. RESULTS: The early treatment lasted on average 12.3 (+/- 7.2) months. Treatment time of Class III malocclusion and lateral crossbite was significantly shorter than that of Class II, 1 malocclusion, functional Class II, 2 malocclusion or anterior open bite (p < 0.05). A Class I occlusion was achieved in 90% of the patients during treatment of the primary dentition. No patient treated successfully in the primary dentition showed any relapse to initial malocclusion. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that changes in occlusion and mandibular position during treatment in the primary dentition are maintained in the mixed and permanent dentition. It can be concluded that a Class I occlusion following orthodontic treatment in the primary dentition serves as a basis for physiological development of the dentition and craniofacial growth.

A phase I comparative study of contraceptive vaginal films containing benzalkonium chloride and nonoxynol-9. Postcoital testing and colposcopy.

Benzalkonium chloride (BZK) has been shown in in vitro and in vivo studies to immobilize sperm, to be active against STD-causing organisms, and to penetrate and thicken cervical mucus. A US clinical study of a sponge containing 60 mg BZK showed life table pregnancy rates at 6 and 12 months of 11.7 and 18.9 per 100 women, respectively. BZK is not currently marketed in the US as a contraceptive. The present study aimed to assess 1) the ability of a new contraceptive vaginal film containing either of two doses of BZK to prevent the penetration of sperm into midcycle cervical mucus; 2) the effect of the film on the vaginal epithelium; and 3) the acceptability of the film. All results were compared with VCF, a currently marketed film containing nonoxynol-9 (N-9). Ten women underwent two baseline cycles of postcoital testing in which no film was used, followed by three test cycles in which Allendale-BZK film, a new film containing either 19 or 25 mg BZK, or VCF, containing 70 mg N-9, was used. The sequence of testing cycles was randomized. In each cycle, condoms were used prior to midcycle, then a midcycle cervical mucus specimen was examined to ensure midcycle characteristics and the absence of sperm. Each woman then had intercourse using either no film (baseline cycles) or a test film (test cycles) and returned 2-3 h afterwards. Cervical mucus was again assessed for adequacy and the presence of sperm. Each woman also underwent colposcopy, using a protocol developed by the World Health Organization. The average number of progressively motile sperm seen per high power field was as follows: first baseline cycle, 22.2; second baseline cycle, 22.1; test cycle with film containing 19 mg BZK, 0.2; test cycle with film containing 25 mg BZK, 0.0; and test cycle with VCF containing 70 mg N-9, 0.0. There was no significant difference between baseline cycles or among test cycles in the average number of progressively motile sperm seen (p = 0.78 and p > or = 0.75, respectively). The average number of progressively motile sperm seen in each test cycle did, however, differ significantly from the average number seen in either baseline cycle (p < 0.01). Colposcopy showed superficial de-epithelialization without underlying inflammation in 15-20% of baseline cycles, regardless of whether colposcopy was done before or after coitus; in 50% of cycles in which either dose of BZK was used; and in 69% of cycles in which VCF was used. In all cases women were asymptomatic. Erythema and petechiae were also seen on colposcopy although at a lower frequency than de-epithelialization. There was no difference in the acceptability of the films. A vaginal contraceptive containing either 19 or 25 mg BZK in a new film base appears to be comparable with VCF in preventing sperm from entering midcycle cervical mucus and may be somewhat less disruptive to the vaginal epithelium.

PIP: Both in vitro and in vivo studies have confirmed the capability of benzalkonium chloride (BZK) to immobilize sperm, protect against sexually transmitted pathogens, and penetrate and thicken cervical mucus. In this Phase I study, 10 US women underwent 2 baseline cycles followed by 3 experimental cycles in which either a new contraceptive vaginal film containing 19 or 25 mg of BZK or a currently marketed film containing 70 mg of nonoxynol-9 (N-9) was used. After a midcycle cervical mucus specimen was analyzed, each woman had intercourse using either no film or a test film and was evaluated 2-3 hours later. The average number of progressively motile sperm seen per high power field was as follows: first baseline cycle, 22.2; second baseline cycle, 22.1; test cycle with film containing 19 mg BZK, 0.2; test cycle with film containing 25 mg BZK, 0.0; and test cycle with film containing 70 mg N-9, 0.0. Colposcopy revealed superficial de-epithelialization without underlying inflammation in 15-20% of baseline cycles, 50% of BZK test cycles, and 69% of cycles in which the N-9 film was used. Women rated both films as neutral or pleasant in terms of appearance, smell, and feel. These findings suggest that contraceptive vaginal films containing either 19 or 25 mg of BZK are as effective as N-9 containing films and may be somewhat less disruptive to the vaginal epithelium. However, since each woman used each BZK film only once, the effects of multiple use on the vaginal epithelium and microflora require further study.

An evaluation of the amount of nonoxynol-9 remaining in the vagina up to 4 h after insertion of a vaginal contraceptive film (VCF) containing 70 mg nonoxynol-9.

The objectives of this study were to determine the amount of nonoxynol-9 (N-9) remaining in the vagina 30 min and 1, 1.5, 2, and 4 h after vaginal insertion of a single sheet of VCF containing 70 mg N-9 and to compare these results to the manufacturer's instructions for use of this product. A new method of vaginal lavage was used to obtain samples for N-9 determination. This was an open-label, noncomparative, pharmacokinetic study in 12 healthy women volunteers not at risk for pregnancy. The study consisted of a screening visit followed by five test visits approximately 1 month apart and a final visit 1 week after all test visits were completed. At each test visit, the investigator inserted a single sheet of VCF in the vagina of the volunteer at midcycle. The volunteer remained in the clinic and underwent vaginal lavage with normal saline after one of five specified time intervals had elapsed. The sequence of the intervals completed by each volunteer was determined by randomization. When undissolved film was found in the vagina, it was removed prior to lavage and assayed for N-9 content separately from that recovered in lavage fluid. It was assumed that the N-9 in undissolved film would not contribute significantly to sperm immobilization. Between 18.5 and 28.5 mg of N-9 were recovered in lavage fluid after intervals of 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 h. These levels did not differ statistically (p > 0.05). The amount of N-9 recovered dropped significantly at 4 h to 11.0 mg. If it is assumed that an N-9 concentration of 0.100 mg/mL is required to immobilize sperm in vitro, this study suggests that the amount of N-9 remaining in the vagina in the form of dissolved film up to 4 h after insertion of VCF is sufficient to immobilize sperm. The lavage procedure may not have recovered all N-9 remaining in the vagina. However, intercourse did not take place between insertion and lavage; if it had, the proportion of the film remaining undissolved and the total amount N-9 remaining in the vagina at the time of examination might have been affected.

PIP: The amount of nonoxynol-9 (N-9) remaining in the vagina 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 4.0 hours after vaginal insertion of a single sheet of a contraceptive film (VCP) containing 70 mg of N-9 was investigated in a pharmacokinetic study involving 12 US women. At each of 5 test visits, approximately 1 month apart, a single sheet of VCF was inserted at midcycle. Vaginal lavage with normal saline was then performed after 1 of the 5 specified time intervals had elapsed. At 30 minutes, an average of 34.4 mg (49% of the total N-9) could be recovered. After intervals of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 hours, 18.5-28.5 mg of N-9 was recovered in lavage fluid. The amount of recovered N-9 dropped significantly to 11.0 mg after 4.0 hours. It is assumed that an N-9 concentration of 0.100 mg/mL is required to immobilize sperm. Thus, the amount of N-9 remaining in the vagina up to 4.0 hours after insertion of VCF is sufficient for contraception. The VCF label states that intercourse may take place 15 minutes after film insertion. Although lavage was not performed at this time point, it can be assumed that at least 49% of the original N-9 would be present. Since this study is limited by the fact that intercourse did not take place, future studies should include postcoital measures of the amount of N-9 persisting at various intervals.

A phase I comparative study of three contraceptive vaginal films containing nonoxynol-9. Postcoital testing and colposcopy.

The objectives of this study were 1) to assess the ability of a new contraceptive vaginal film containing two doses of nonoxynol-9 (N-9) to prevent the penetration of sperm into midcycle cervical mucus, and 2) to determine the effect of the film on the vaginal epithelium. The novel formulation was compared with VCF (a currently marketed film also containing N-9). Ten women underwent two baseline cycles of postcoital testing in which no film was used, followed by three test cycles in which Allendale-N9 film, a new film containing either 100 or 130 mg N-9, or VCF containing 70mg N-9 was used. The sequence of testing cycles was randomized. In each cycle, condoms were used prior to midcycle, then a midcycle cervical mucus specimen was examined to ensure midcycle characteristics and the absence of sperm. Each woman then had intercourse using either no film (baseline cycles) or a test film (test cycles) and returned 2-3 h afterwards. Cervical mucus was again assessed for adequacy and the presence of sperm. Each woman also underwent colposcopy using a protocol developed by the World Health Organization. The average number of progressively motile sperm seen per high power field were as follows: average of the two baseline cycles, 19.3; test cycle with Allendale-N9 film containing 100 mg N-9, 0.6; test cycle with Allendale-N9 film containing 130 mg N-9, 0.9; and test cycle with VCF, 0.5. There was no significant difference between baseline cycles or between test cycles in the number of progressively motile sperm per high power field (HPF) seen (p = 0.31 and p > or = 0.50, respectively). The average number of motile sperm seen in each test cycle did, however, differ significantly from the number in either baseline cycle (p < 0.02). The majority of colposcopic examinations were normal. In one baseline cycle and eight test cycles, colposcopy showed superficial de-epithelialization without underlying inflammation. There was no apparent dose response and in all cases the volunteers were asymptomatic. A vaginal contraceptive containing either 100 or 130 mg N-9 in a new film base appears to be safe and comparable to VCF in preventing sperm from entering midcycle cervical mucus.

PIP: In this Phase I study, 10 US women underwent sequential testing of 3 contraceptive vaginal films containing nonoxynol-9 (N-9): a new Allendale-N-9 film containing either 100 or 130 mg of the spermicide or the commercially available VCF product containing 70 mg of N-9. After a midcycle cervical mucus specimen was collected, women had intercourse using either no film (2 baseline cycles) or a test film and returned 2-3 hours later for further testing. The average number of progressively motile sperm seen per high power field were as follows: average of the 2 baseline cycles, 19.3; test cycle with Allendale-N-9 film containing 100 mg N-9, 0.6; test cycle with Allendale-N-9 film containing 130 mg N-9, 0.9; and test cycle with VCF, 0.5. In 1 baseline and 8 test cycles, colposcopy revealed superficial de-epithelialization. De-epithelialization occurred least often when the 100 mg Allendale film was used. None of the women who experienced de-epithelialization reported symptomatic irritation. These findings indicate that the new contraceptive product containing either 100 or 130 mg of N-9 is safe and comparable to the VCF product in terms of preventing sperm from entering midcycle cervical mucus.

A phase I study of Femcap used with and without spermicide. Postcoital testing.

The objectives of the study were to assess the ability of the Femcap, a new vaginal contraceptive device made of silicone and designed to fit snugly around the cervix to prevent the penetration of sperm into midcycle cervical mucus when used with and without spermicide; and to compare it with the standard contraceptive diaphragm used with spermicide. Eight women underwent two baseline cycles of postcoital testing in which no device was used, followed by three test cycles in which Femcap with spermicide, Femcap with nonspermicidal lubricant (K'Y gel) or the Ortho All-Flex diaphragm with spermicide was used. The sequence of testing cycles was randomized. In each cycle, condoms were used prior to midcycle, then a midcycle cervical mucus specimen was examined to ensure midcycle characteristics and the absence of sperm. Each woman then had intercourse using either no device (baseline cycles) or the prescribed device (test cycles) and returned 2-3 h afterwards. Cervical mucus was again assessed for adequacy and the presence of spermatozoa. The average number of progressively motile sperm seen per high power field was as follows: first baseline cycle, 18.0; second baseline cycle, 17.8; test cycle with Femcap used with nonspermicidal lubricant, 0.1; test cycle with Femcap used with spermicide, 0.2; and test cycle with the diaphragm used with spermicide, 0.0. There was no significant difference between baseline cycles or among test cycles in the average number of progressively motile sperm seen (p > 0.05). The average number of progressively motile sperm seen in each test cycle did, however, differ significantly from the average number seen in either baseline cycle (p < 0.05). Femcap, used with either a spermicidal lubricant or a nonspermicidal lubricant, appears to be comparable with the diaphragm used with spermicide in preventing sperm from entering midcycle cervical mucus.

PIP: A Phase I postcoital study assessed the capability of Femcap, a new vaginal contraceptive device made of silicone, to prevent sperm from entering midcycle cervical mucus. After 2 baseline cycles of postcoital testing in which no device was used, 8 US women underwent 3 test cycles in which Femcap with spermicide, Femcap with a nonspermicidal lubricant (KY gel), or the Ortho All-Flex diaphragm with spermicide was used. The sequence of testing cycles was randomized. The average number of progressively motile sperm seen per high power field was as follows: first baseline cycle, 18.0; second baseline cycle, 17.8; test cycle with Femcap used with nonspermicidal lubricant, 0.1; test cycle with Femcap used with spermicide, 0.2; and test cycle with the diaphragm used with spermicide, 0.0. These findings indicate that Femcap, used with either a spermicide or a nonspermicidal lubricant, is comparable to the diaphragm in terms of its ability to prevent the penetration of sperm into midcycle cervical mucus.

Lea's Shield: a study of the safety and efficacy of a new vaginal barrier contraceptive used with and without spermicide.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and acceptability of Lea's Shield, a new vaginal contraceptive barrier device, when used with either spermicidal or non-spermicidal lubricant. One-hundred-eighty-five (185) women enrolled at six centers. Half were randomized to use the device with spermicide and half with a non-spermicidal lubricant. To be eligible, volunteers had to be 18-40 years old (inclusive), in good health with regular menses, sexually active in an ongoing relationship and at risk for pregnancy, and willing to use Lea's Shield as their sole means of contraception for six months. Participants were seen at admission, one week, one month, three months and six months. Gross cumulative life table rates were calculated for pregnancy and others reasons for discontinuation. Adverse experiences and responses to an acceptability questionnaire were evaluated. One-hundred-eighty-two (182) volunteers contributed data to the analysis of safety and 146 to that of contraceptive efficacy. The unadjusted six-month life table pregnancy rate was 8.7 per 100 women for spermicide users and 12.9 for non-spermicide users (p = 0.287). After controlling for age, center, and frequent prior use of barrier methods, the adjusted six-month life table pregnancy rate was 5.6 for spermicide users and 9.3 for non-spermicide users (p = 0.086), indicating that use of spermicide lowered pregnancy rates, although not significantly, during typical use. For purposes of comparison, it is important to note that this study differed from the cap/diaphragm and sponge/ diaphragm studies in that a high percentage (84%) of volunteers were parous. For reasons that are unclear, pregnancy rates among parous women using barrier contraceptives tend to be higher than among nulliparous women. Indeed, in this study there were no pregnancies among nulliparous users of Lea's Shield. Standardization of parity of this study population on those of the cap/diaphragm and sponge/diaphragm studies suggests that unadjusted pregnancy rates for this device would have been considerably lower (2.2 and 2.9 per 100 users of spermicide and non-spermicide, respectively) had the study been done using the populations of earlier studies. Since no directly comparative study has been done, these figures provide a tentative estimate of the relative efficacy of Lea's Shield compared with the sponge, cap, and diaphragm. There were no serious adverse experiences attributed to the use of Lea's Shield. Acceptability was very good. Seventy-five percent (75%) of women responded to an end-of-study questionnaire; 87% of these reported that they would recommend Lea's Shield to a friend. Lea's Shield is a new vaginal contraceptive that does not require clinician fitting. Pregnancy rates in this study compare favorably with other studies of barrier contraceptive methods including the cervical cap, diaphragm, and sponge, even though this study was done with greater rigor and with a greater percentage of parous women than previous barrier studies. Lea's Shield appears to be safe and very acceptable to study volunteers.

PIP: At six US centers, between August 1991 and October 1993, a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the contraceptive efficacy of Lea's Shield (a new vaginal contraceptive barrier device) used with and without a spermicidal lubricant as well as its safety and acceptability. The clinical researchers enrolled 185 healthy women aged 18-40 who menstruated regularly, were sexually active, and at risk for pregnancy. 84% of the women were parous. They were asked to use Lea's Shield as their only contraceptive method for 6 months. The analysis of safety included 182 women, while that of contraceptive efficacy included 146 women. The adjusted 6-month life table pregnancy rate for spermicide users was lower than that for non-spermicide users (5.6% vs. 9.3%), but not significantly so (p = 0.086). None of the nulliparous women conceived, however. When the researchers standardized parity in this study population comparable to the parity of cap/diaphragm and sponge/diaphragm studies, the unadjusted and adjusted pregnancy rates would have been much lower (2.2% for spermicide users vs. 2.9% for non-spermicide users and 1.3% vs. 2.6%, respectively). No woman experienced serious or unexpected adverse effects using Lea's Shield. Discontinuation rates for device-related reasons were low (7.8% for spermicide users and 6.7% for non-spermicide users). 87% of women who completed an end-of-study questionnaire and 69% of men would recommend Lea's Shield to a friend. 84% of women and 55% of their partners liked Lea's Shield. 84% of women who had an opinion on the diaphragm preferred Lea's Shield. The aspects most liked were convenience and ease of insertion. These findings suggest that this new vaginal barrier contraceptive (available in one size fits all) has a relatively good contraceptive efficacy compared with other barrier methods and is safe and acceptable.

Lea's Shield: a phase I postcoital study of a new contraceptive barrier device.

Lea's Shield is a new vaginal barrier contraceptive that may offer advantages over existing methods. It is made of silicone which is resistant to petroleum-based lubricants, does not absorb odors, and does not cause allergic reactions in users with latex sensitivity. It has an anterior loop for ease of insertion and removal and a one-way flutter valve. Its novel design has sufficient volume to fill the posterior fornix, which helps keep it in place and prevent sperm from entering the cervical os. This study evaluated with a standard postcoital test (PCT) the ability of the Lea's Shield used with spermicide or non-spermicidal lubricant to prevent sperm from entering midcycle cervical mucus. Ten sterilized women underwent four PCT cycles: one cycle in which no contraceptive barrier was used (a baseline cycle) and 3 cycles in which one of the following was used: Lea's Shield with spermicide, or with non-spermicidal lubricant, or the contraceptive diaphragm used with spermicide. All volunteers demonstrated more than 5 progressively motile sperm per high power field in the cervical mucus after intercourse in the baseline cycle. No motile sperm were found in the cervical mucus in any cycle in which Lea's Shield or the diaphragm was used with spermicide. No motile sperm were found in cervical mucus in 9 of 10 cycles in which Lea's Shield was used without spermicide. Only two progressively motile sperm were present in the cervical mucus of one volunteer who used the shield with non-spermicidal lubricant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PIP: The results of a Phase I postcoital study of Lea's Shield, a new vaginal barrier contraceptive, suggest that this device is as effective as the vaginal diaphragm, even when used without spermicide. Evaluated was the ability of the Lea's Shield to prevent sperm from entering midcycle cervical mucus. Ten sterilized women underwent a baseline cycle followed by three additional cycles under one of the following conditions: Lea's Shield with spermicide, Lea's Shield with a nonspermicidal lubricant, or standard vaginal diaphragm with spermicide. In the baseline cycle, all subjects demonstrated more than five progressively motile sperm per high power field in the cervical mucus after intercourse. No sperm were detected in the post-intercourse cervical mucus in either the women who used the standard diaphragm with spermicide or those using the Lea's Shield with spermicide. One volunteer who used the Lea's Shield without spermicide had two progressively motile sperm in the cervical mucus; however, this involved a small size device that is no longer manufactured and was considered unlikely to result in pregnancy. There were no side effects reported by Lea's Shield users. Advantages of this new device include its silicone composition (more resistant to heat and deterioration, less absorbent of odors, and less likely to cause allergic reactions than latex), anterior loop for ease of insertion and removal, one-way flutter valve, and lack of pressure on the urethra.