Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Main subject
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 52(7): 102604, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37210009

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To estimate diagnostic accuracy of sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis in current practice when compared to pathology as a "gold standard". METHODS: This diagnosis accuracy study was observational and retrospective, including women managed by hysterectomy for benign pathology from January 2015 to November 2018. Preoperative pelvic sonography reports were collected, including details on diagnosis criteria for adenomyosis. Sonographic findings were compared to pathological results of the hysterectomy specimens. RESULTS: Our study initially concerned 510 women; 242 of them had adenomyosis confirmed by a pathological examination. The pathological prevalence of adenomyosis was 47.4% in this study. A preoperative sonography was available for 89.4% of the 242 women, with a suspicion of adenomyosis in 32.7% of them. In this study, Sensitivity is 52%, Specificity 85%, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 77%, Negative Predictive Value (NPV) 86% and Accuracy 38,1%. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic sonography is the most common non-invasive examination used in gynecology. It is also the first recommended examination for the diagnosis of adenomyosis because of its acceptability and its cost, even if the diagnosis performances are moderate. However, these performances are comparable to MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) performances. The use of a standardized sonographic classification could improve and harmonize the diagnosis of adenomyosis.


Subject(s)
Adenomyosis , Female , Humans , Adenomyosis/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography , Hysterectomy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...