Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Sternotomy for Cardiac Surgery-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the analgesic efficacy of postoperative deep parasternal intercostal plane (DPIP) blocks for patients having cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. DESIGN: This single-center retrospective study compared patients receiving bilateral DPIP blocks with a matched cohort of patients not receiving DPIP blocks. SETTING: Large quaternary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients admitted to the authors' institution from January 1, 2016, to August 14, 2020, for elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received ultrasound-guided bilateral DPIP blocks. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 113 patients received a DPIP block; 3,461 patients did not. The estimated multiplicative change in cumulative opioid consumption through 24 hours was 0.42 (95% CI 0.32-0.56; p < 0.001), indicating that patients receiving DPIP blocks required 60% fewer opioids than patients who did not. Proportional odds ratios for the average pain score on postoperative day (POD) 0 was 0.46 (95% CI 0.32-0.65; p < 0.001), and POD 1 was 0.67 (95% CI 0.47-0.94; p = 0.021), indicating lower pain scores for patients receiving blocks. The exploratory analysis identified an inverse correlation between DPIP blocks and atrial fibrillation incidence (2% v 15%; inverse probability of treatment weighting odds ratio 0.088, 95% CI 0.02-0.41; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The use of DPIP blocks in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy was associated with less opioid use and improved pain scores in the early postoperative period compared with patients not receiving blocks. Prospective randomized controlled studies should further elucidate the efficacy and risks of DPIP blocks in cardiac surgery.

Impact of ketamine versus propofol for anesthetic induction on cognitive dysfunction, delirium, and acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery in elderly, high-risk patients.

Objective: Evaluate the effects of ketamine versus propofol when used for induction of anesthesia in elderly, high-risk cardiac surgical patients on postoperative complications including cognitive dysfunction, delirium, and acute kidney injury. Methods: Prospective, randomized study performed at a tertiary medical center. A total of 52 patients aged ≥70 and older presenting for complex cardiac surgery were randomized to receive either ketamine or propofol for induction of anesthesia. Patients underwent a battery of cognitive testing preoperatively and postoperatively and the incidence of delirium and acute kidney injury were measured. Norepinephrine (NEE) equivalents following induction were assessed for each group. Results: A total of 49 patients were included, 25 in the ketamine group and 24 in the propofol group with 3 patients excluded from the analysis. No difference was found between groups in either postoperative cognitive dysfunction or delirium incidence. Acute kidney injury occurred in 6 (24%) patients in the ketamine group in 12 (50%) patients in the propofol group, but the difference did not meet statistical significance (P = 0.08; Relative Risk = 2.1, 95% CI 0.9-4.7). NEE equivalents were lower in the ketamine group, 9.6 ± 22.2 versus 32.7 ± 46.0, P < 0.03. Conclusions: The use of ketamine versus propofol for induction of anesthesia did not impact the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction or delirium. Twice as many patients in the propofol group developed acute kidney injury, although not reaching statistical significance and warranting further investigation. In elderly, high-risk patients, ketamine was associated with a significantly reduced need for vasopressor support following induction.

Perioperative management of aortic stenosis in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Aortic stenosis is one of the most common cardiac valve pathologies in the world and its prevalence increases with age. Although previously associated with increased perioperative mortality, more recent studies suggest that mortality rates may be decreasing. Recent guidelines suggest that major non-cardiac surgery can be performed safely in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis patients with close hemodynamic monitoring. Among symptomatic patients, the guidelines recommend aortic valve intervention prior to major non-cardiac surgery because of a reduction in the incidence of postoperative heart failure and improved rates of long-term overall survival. This review provides a comprehensive and contemporary review of the perioperative management of patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Coagulation Tests and Bleeding Classification After Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: No recent prospective studies have analyzed the accuracy of standard coagulation tests and thromboelastography (TEG) to identify patients with excessive microvascular bleeding following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The aim of this study was to assess the value of coagulation profile tests, as well as TEG, for the classification of microvascular bleeding after CPB. DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: At a single-center academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Qualitative assessment of microvascular bleeding post-CPB (surgeon and anesthesiologist consensus) and the association with coagulation profile tests and TEG values. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 816 patients were included in the study-358 (44%) bleeders and 458 (56%) nonbleeders. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for the coagulation profile tests and TEG values ranged from 45% to 72%. The predictive utility was similar across tests, with prothrombin time (PT) (62% accuracy, 51% sensitivity, 70% specificity), international normalized ratio (INR) (62% accuracy, 48% sensitivity, 72% specificity), and platelet count (62% accuracy, 62% sensitivity, 61% specificity) displaying the highest performance. Secondary outcomes were worse in bleeders versus nonbleeders, including higher chest tube drainage, total blood loss, transfusion of red blood cells, reoperation rates (p < 0.001, respectively), readmission within 30 days (p = 0.007), and hospital mortality (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Standard coagulation tests and individual components of TEG in isolation agree poorly with the visual classification of microvascular bleeding after CPB. The PT-INR and platelet count performed best but had low accuracy. Further work is warranted to identify better testing strategies to guide perioperative transfusion decisions in cardiac surgical patients.

Pectoral Fascial Plane Versus Paravertebral Blocks for Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Analgesia.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single-injection pectoral fascial plane (PECS) II blocks compared to paravertebral blocks for elective robotic mitral valve surgery. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective study that reported patient and procedural characteristics, postoperative pain scores, and postoperative opioid use for patients undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery. SETTING: This investigation was performed at a large quaternary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (age ≥18) admitted to the authors' hospital from January 1, 2016, to August 14, 2020, for elective robotic mitral valve repair who received either a paravertebral or PECS II block for postoperative analgesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received an ultrasound-guided, unilateral paravertebral or PECS II nerve block. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients received a PECS II block, and 190 patients received a paravertebral block during the study period. The primary outcome measures were average postoperative pain scores and cumulative opioid use. Secondary outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, need for reoperation, need for antiemetics, surgical wound infection, and atrial fibrillation incidence. Patients receiving the PECS II block required significantly fewer opioids in the immediate postoperative period than the paravertebral block group, and had comparable postoperative pain scores. No increase in adverse outcomes was noted for either group. CONCLUSIONS: The PECS II block is a safe and highly effective option for regional analgesia for robotic mitral valve surgery, with demonstrated efficacy comparable to the paravertebral block.

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate vs Plasma for Post-Cardiopulmonary Bypass Coagulopathy and Bleeding: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) coagulopathy and bleeding are among the most common reasons for blood product transfusion in surgical practices. Current retrospective data suggest lower transfusion rates and blood loss in patients receiving prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) compared with plasma after cardiac surgery. Objective: To analyze perioperative bleeding and transfusion outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who develop microvascular bleeding and receive treatment with either PCC or plasma. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-institution, prospective, randomized clinical trial performed at a high-volume cardiac surgical center. Patients were aged 18 years or older and undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Patients undergoing complex cardiac surgical procedures (eg, aortic replacement surgery, multiple procedures, or repeated sternotomy) were preferentially targeted for enrollment. During the study period, 756 patients were approached for enrollment, and 553 patients were randomized. Of the 553 randomized patients, 100 patients met criteria for study intervention. Interventions: Patients with excessive microvascular bleeding, a prothombin time (PT) greater than 16.6 seconds, and an international normalized ratio (INR) greater than 1.6 were randomized to receive treatment with either PCC or plasma. The PCC dose was 15 IU/kg or closest standardized dose; the plasma dose was a suggested volume of 10 to 15 mL/kg rounded to the nearest unit. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding (chest tube output) from the initial postsurgical intensive care unit admission through midnight on postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes were PT/INR, rates of intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion after treatment, avoidance of allogeneic transfusion from the intraoperative period to the end of postoperative day 1, postoperative bleeding, and adverse events. Results: One hundred patients (mean [SD] age, 66.8 [13.7] years; 61 [61.0%] male; and 1 [1.0%] Black, 1 [1.0%] Hispanic, and 98 [98.0%] White) received the study intervention (49 plasma and 51 PCC). There was no significant difference in chest tube output between the plasma and PCC groups (median [IQR], 1022 [799-1575] mL vs 937 [708-1443] mL). After treatment, patients in the PCC arm had a greater improvement in PT (effect estimate, -1.37 seconds [95% CI, -1.91 to -0.84]; P < .001) and INR (effect estimate, -0.12 [95% CI, -0.16 to -0.07]; P < .001). Fewer patients in the PCC group required intraoperative RBC transfusion after treatment (7 of 51 patients [13.7%] vs 15 of 49 patients [30.6%]; P = .04); total intraoperative transfusion rates were not significantly different between groups. Seven (13.7%) of 51 patients receiving PCCs avoided allogeneic transfusion from the intraoperative period to the end of postoperative day 1 vs none of those receiving plasma. There were no significant differences in postoperative bleeding, transfusions, or adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest a similar overall safety and efficacy profile for PCCs compared with plasma in this clinical context, with fewer posttreatment intraoperative RBC transfusions, improved PT/INR correction, and higher likelihood of allogeneic transfusion avoidance in patients receiving PCCs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02557672.

Perioperative Outcomes for Radical Nephrectomy and Level III-IV Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the characteristics, intraoperative, and postoperative course of patients undergoing inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. DESIGN: A single-center case series that reported demographic data and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing inferior vena cava thrombectomy. SETTING: This investigation was performed at a large quaternary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (age ≥18) admitted to the authors' hospital from January 1, 2005, to March 10, 2017, undergoing inferior vena cava thrombectomy for level III and IV renal cell carcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-five patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified, with 31 patients diagnosed with level III and 34 with level IV renal cell carcinoma. Patients with level IV tumors were significantly more likely to have greater intraoperative blood loss, had longer surgical duration and hospital stays, and had more frequently required blood products, pressors, and cardiopulmonary bypass intraoperatively. Intraoperative transesophageal echo was more frequently used in level IV thrombectomy compared to level III (91.2% v 67.7%). Of patients with level IV thrombus, 41.2% developed postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to only 3.2% with level III thrombus. The 30-day mortality was 4.6% for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma had more complex intraoperative and postoperative courses with level IV compared to level III tumor thrombus.

Use of plasma late on cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation.

Coagulopathy is common during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, treatment of which can be challenging given the often-limited ability for the right ventricle to accommodate volume transfusion after device initiation with 20% to 40% of patients developing right ventricular failure (RVF). Transfusion of plasma late on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) combined with ultrafiltration may replace clotting factors while reducing volume administration. We compared outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation receiving plasma on CPB and ultrafiltration with traditional transfusion practices. Co-primary outcomes needed for blood product transfusion in the first 6 and 24 hours after CPB. Secondary outcomes included metrics of morbidity and mortality. 396 patients were analyzed (59 plasma on CPB). Patients receiving plasma on CPB had a greater volume of blood products transfused (3764 vs. 2741 mL first 6 hours; 6059 vs. 4305 mL first 24 hours) in unadjusted analysis. In adjusted analysis, plasma transfusion on CPB with ultrafiltration had no significant effect on the primary outcomes of blood products given in the first 6 hours (estimated effect size 982 [-428, 2392] mL, P = .17) and 24 hours (estimated effect size 1076 [-904, 3057] mL, P = .29). Patients receiving plasma on CPB were more likely on either vasopressors or inotropes at 24 hours after ICU admission (P = .01), however, indices of coagulopathy and RVF were similar between groups. While prospective studies would be necessary to definitively evaluate the clinical utility of this strategy, no signal for benefit was observed suggesting plasma should not be used for this purpose.

Emergent pulmonary thromboembolectomy and atrial septal aneurysmectomy for intracardiac impending paradoxical embolism: An en bloc approach to prevent clot embolism and facilitate repair.

Although a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is relatively common, confirmed reports of thrombus entrapped within a PFO are uncommon. Management of impending paradoxical embolism (IPE), also called a thrombus in transit, lacks consensus but includes systemic anticoagulation (e.g., heparin), systemic thrombolysis, or surgical thrombectomy. We present a case of IPE diagnosed with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as well as a novel en bloc approach to atrial septal aneurysmectomy to minimize embolism and facilitate repair of the interatrial septum. Timely use of intraoperative TEE may aid in diagnosis and help guide the surgical approach to minimize embolic risk with an IPE.

MELD and MELD XI Scores as Predictors of Mortality After Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between the preoperative model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and MELD-XI (exclude international normalized ratio) score and outcomes in patients undergoing pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients >18 years of age undergoing pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis between January 1, 2007, and October 12, 2017, were analyzed with data for MELD and MELD-XI score calculation within 30 days preoperatively. The association between the MELD and MELD-XI scoring systems and risk of postoperative outcomes was assessed in regression models adjusting for relevant covariates. The primary outcome was operative mortality (death within 90 days or in hospital). Secondary outcomes included various measures of postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 175 and 226 patients had data for MELD/MELD-XI, respectively. Ninety-day mortality was 8.7%. When stratified into tertiles of MELD-XI, the unadjusted risk of 90-day mortality was 2.7%, 8.2%, and 16.0%, respectively. In Cox regression models fitted for MELD-XI and MELD, higher scores associated with increased risk of mortality (P<.001 for both). In secondary multivariable analyses, both MELD-XI and MELD were associated with increased incidence of renal failure and greater levels of chest-tube output and transfusion, whereas MELD-XI was additionally associated with prolonged intubation and extended intensive care unit and hospital stays. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis, MELD-XI and MELD were associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Although the simpler MELD-XI score generally performed as well or better than MELD as a correlate of various outcomes, both scores can serve as a simple yet robust risk stratification tool for patients undergoing pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis.

Bedside Allogeneic Erythrocyte Washing with a Cell Saver to Remove Cytokines, Chemokines, and Cell-derived Microvesicles.

BACKGROUND: Removal of cytokines, chemokines, and microvesicles from the supernatant of allogeneic erythrocytes may help mitigate adverse transfusion reactions. Blood bank-based washing procedures present logistical difficulties; therefore, we tested the hypothesis that on-demand bedside washing of allogeneic erythrocyte units is capable of removing soluble factors and is feasible in a clinical setting. METHODS: There were in vitro and prospective, observation cohort components to this a priori planned substudy evaluating bedside allogeneic erythrocyte washing, with a cell saver, during cardiac surgery. Laboratory data were collected from the first 75 washed units given to a subset of patients nested in the intervention arm of a parent clinical trial. Paired pre- and postwash samples from the blood unit bags were centrifuged. The supernatant was aspirated and frozen at -70°C, then batch-tested for cell-derived microvesicles, soluble CD40 ligand, chemokine ligand 5, and neutral lipids (all previously associated with transfusion reactions) and cell-free hemoglobin (possibly increased by washing). From the entire cohort randomized to the intervention arm of the trial, bedside washing was defined as feasible if at least 75% of prescribed units were washed per protocol. RESULTS: Paired data were available for 74 units. Washing reduced soluble CD40 ligand (median [interquartile range]; from 143 [1 to 338] ng/ml to zero), chemokine ligand 5 (from 1,314 [715 to 2,551] to 305 [179 to 488] ng/ml), and microvesicle numbers (from 6.90 [4.10 to 20.0] to 0.83 [0.33 to 2.80] × 106), while cell-free hemoglobin concentration increased from 72.6 (53.6 to 171.6) mg/dl to 210.5 (126.6 to 479.6) mg/dl (P < 0.0001 for each). There was no effect on neutral lipids. Bedside washing was determined as feasible for 80 of 81 patients (99%); overall, 293 of 314 (93%) units were washed per protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside erythrocyte washing was clinically feasible and greatly reduced concentrations of soluble factors thought to be associated with transfusion-related adverse reactions, increasing concentrations of cell-free hemoglobin while maintaining acceptable (less than 0.8%) hemolysis.

Coagulation test changes associated with acute normovolemic hemodilution in cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are at risk for coagulopathy and bleeding requiring blood product transfusion. Acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) is a blood conservation technique shown to reduce transfusion and bleeding associated with cardiac surgery. Despite numerous advantages, little is known about the effect of ANH on coagulation testing. METHODS: Prospective observational study, 80 patients (40 controls, 40 ANH) undergoing cardiac surgery requiring CPB. Blood for coagulation testing (hemoglobin, platelet count, prothrombin time/International Normalized Ratio [PT/INR], activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], fibrinogen, and kaolin thromboelastography [TEG]) was collected 5 minutes after protamine (Time 1), and following ANH reinfusion (or 30 minutes after Time 1) in controls (Time 2). RESULTS: Patients undergoing ANH had a significantly lower aPTT (-1.4 seconds 95% CI [-2.7, 0.0]; P = .044) and higher fibrinogen (+13 mg/dL [+1, +26]; P = .040) between Time 1 and Time 2 compared to controls. Additionally, the change in hemoglobin between Time 1 and Time 2 was significantly increased in the ANH group (+0.4 [+0.1, +0.8]; P = .024). The study also demonstrated a normalization of the platelet count, PT/INR, aPTT, and TEG values between Time 1 and Time 2 in control patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery requiring CPB, ANH results in significant improvements of aPTT, fibrinogen and hemoglobin values; however, the true clinical significance is questionable. In the absence of ongoing surgical bleeding, there appears to be normalization of coagulation tests (excluding fibrinogen) following CPB.

Intraoperative Fluid Balance and Perioperative Outcomes After Aortic Valve Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The effect of intraoperative fluid balance on postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in cardiac surgical patients is poorly defined. METHODS: In this retrospective study of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, the primary outcome of interest was postoperative AKI. Secondary outcomes were postoperative fluid balance, cardiac index, vasopressor use, hospital-free days, stroke, myocardial infarction, hospital readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2327 patients were analyzed. Positive intraoperative fluid balance was associated with lower odds of AKI; the lowest odds were in the 20- to 39-mL/kg group (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.81; P = .002). Positive intraoperative fluid balance was associated with a lower postoperative fluid balance. Increased ultrafiltration volume was associated with increased postoperative fluid resuscitation and vasopressor use. AKI was associated with increased 30- and 90-day mortality. Increased fluid balance was associated with increased odds of myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality. Increased ultrafiltration volume was associated with increased odds of 30- and 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, positive intraoperative fluid balance was associated with decreased odds of AKI. Patients developing AKI had increased 30- and 90-day mortality. Although the overall incidence was low, increased intraoperative fluid balance was associated with myocardial infarction and 30-day mortality, whereas increased ultrafiltration volume was associated with 30- and 90-day morality. Prospective studies are needed to better define proper intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

The Safety and Feasibility of Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients With Esophageal Stricture.

OBJECTIVES: Expert guidelines consistently list esophageal stricture (ES) as a contraindication to the performance of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), although anecdotally the authors are aware of patients with ES undergoing TEE without apparent complication. Therefore the authors sought to determine the outcomes of patients with ES who had undergone TEE at their institution. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective review. SETTING: Academic medical center (clinic and affiliated hospital). PARTICIPANTS: Patients with documented ES who also underwent TEE. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In a 10-year period, 1,083 TEE reports were generated for 823 patients who had a diagnosis of ES. One case of esophageal perforation occurred (1/1,083 examination reports [0.09%]) in an 85-year-old male with gastroesophageal reflux disease-related ES who had undergone esophageal dilation the same day as the TEE. In 17.2% of the TEE reports reviewed, changes to the conduct of the examination occurred, such as use of a pediatric probe or avoidance of transgastric imaging. In 8% of reviewed examinations, procedural difficulty was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with nonmalignant ES commonly present for TEE (>100 per year, on average, at the authors' institution). Severe TEE-related esophageal injury rarely occurred in patients with ES. However, changes to the conduct of the TEE examination and procedural difficulty were not infrequent in this group. Clinicians contemplating TEE in patients with ES should prepare for the possibility of altered examination conduct and possible procedural difficulty.

Same-Day Cancellation in Vascular Surgery: 10-Year Review at a Large Tertiary Care Center.

BACKGROUND: Same-day cancellation of vascular surgical procedures is an undesirable occurrence with multifaceted implications into the patient's health care. Numerous factors play a role in same-day cancellations, ranging from medical causes, patient factors, or administrative and scheduling conflicts. METHODS: A retrospective review of the medical records database at our large tertiary academic referral center from 2007 to 2017 was performed to identify patients scheduled for vascular surgical procedures who experienced same-day cancellation. RESULTS: Of the 17,887 scheduled vascular surgical procedures during the study period, 361 (2%) patients experienced same-day cancellations. Seventy-five percent of cancellations were determined to be nonforeseeable, 12.5% foreseeable, and 12.5% indeterminate. The most common reasons for cancellation were medical (55%), patient-initiated cancellation (12%), procedure no longer required (10%), and administrative or scheduling conflicts (10%). Twenty-six (7.3%) patients died within 30 days after their cancelled vascular operation. Most patients (69%) eventually received the planned operation, with a mean interval of 45.5 ± 135.8 days between cancellation and performance of the aforementioned procedure. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, same-day cancellations of vascular surgical procedures were infrequent (2%). Most cancellations were due to medical reasons. Although most cancellations were determined to be nonforeseeable, emphasizing foreseeable cancellations may provide opportunities to improve patient care, enhance satisfaction, and reduce future cancellations.

Cerebrospinal fluid drainage complications during first stage and completion fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates and risk factors of complications related to cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) during first stage and completion fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS: We reviewed the outcomes of 293 consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective, nonrandomized study to investigate outcomes of F-BEVAR between 2013 and 2018. Patients who received CSFD during first-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repair, index F-BEVAR, or completion of temporary aneurysm sac perfusion procedures were included in the analysis. CSFD complications were graded as severe or moderate if they were life threatening, escalated the level of care, or prolonged the hospital stay. Presence of substantial degenerative lumbar disease (DLD) was identified based on review of preoperative computed tomography. End points included technical difficulties during CSFD placement and CSFD-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients (mean age, 73 ± 8 years; 70% male) treated for 20 pararenal and 167 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms received CSFD in 240 procedures, including 51 first-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repairs, 184 index F-BEVARs, and 5 completion temporary aneurysm sac perfusion procedures. Nineteen patients (10%) had 22 CSFD-related complications after 21 aortic procedures (9%). Complications were graded as severe to moderate in 17 patients (9%). There were 12 patients (6%) with intracranial hypotension, including three (2%) who had intracranial hemorrhage and nine (5%) with post dural puncture headache requiring blood patches in six. Another six patients (3%) developed spinal hematomas resulting in paraplegia in two (1%) and transient paraparesis in two (1%). One patient had CSF leakage from the puncture site (no intervention required). Four patients had bleeding during attempted drain placement, which required postponement of F-BEVAR. Technical difficulties were experienced in 57 drain insertions (24%), more often in patients with DLD than in those without DLD (35/113 [31%] vs 22/121 [18%]; P = .03). Fluoroscopic guidance was used in 44 drain placements (18%) with a lower rate of technical difficulties compared with the blind approach (9% vs 28%; P = .01). There was a statistically nonsignificant trend toward more complications in patients with technical challenges (14% vs 7%; P = .10). Of 13 study patients who developed spinal cord injuries during aortic procedures, 4 (31%) were attributed to CSFD. CONCLUSIONS: Although CSFD is widely used to prevent ischemic spinal cord injury during complex aortic repair, the risk of major CSFD-related complications is not negligible and should be carefully weighed against its potential benefits. One-third of spinal cord injuries were caused by CSF drain placement. The use of fluoroscopic guidance may decrease the risk of CSFD-related complications.

Robotic Mitral Valve Repair: Indication for Surgery Does Not Influence Early Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of robotic mitral valve repair (MVr) by primary indication per American Heart Association guidelines for surgery: class I vs class IIa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1, 2008, through September 30, 2016, 603 patients underwent robotic MVr for severe primary mitral regurgitation. Medical records of 576 consenting patients were retrospectively reviewed to determine the primary indication for surgery. Patients were stratified into class I or class IIa, and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared. RESULTS: Of 516 patients, 428 (83%) had class I indication and 88 (17%) had class IIa indication for surgery. Preoperatively, no significant differences were observed between both cohorts. Importantly, a significantly higher number of patients with class I indication underwent MVr for bileaflet prolapse (172 of 428 [40%] vs 21 of 88 [25%]; P=.03). Early MVr outcomes indicated recurrent mitral regurgitation (moderate or greater) in only 12 of 576 (2%), and no significant differences were observed between classes (P=.23). Apart from parameters for ventricular size, all other intraoperative and postoperative variables were comparable between both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Comparable outcomes were indicated across all classes of indications for MVr surgery. These results continue to support the use of this surgical technique, even in less sick patients. Early referral along with more extensive robotic MVr experience will likely result in further improvements in long-term outcomes.

Intensive Care Unit Readmission After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Causes, Associated Factors, and Association With Patient Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on readmissions after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation have focused on hospital readmissions after dismissal from the index hospitalization. Because few data exist, the purpose of this study was to examine intensive care unit (ICU) readmissions in patients during their initial hospitalization for LVAD implantation to determine reasons for, factors associated with, and incidence of mortality after ICU readmission. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed from February 2007 to March 2015 of patients at our institution receiving first-time LVAD implantation. After LVAD implantation, patients dismissed from the ICU who then required ICU readmission before hospital dismissal were compared to those not requiring ICU readmission before hospital dismissal with respect to preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors. RESULTS: Among 287 LVAD patients, 266 survived their initial ICU admission, of which 49 (18.4%) required ICU readmission. The most common reasons for readmission were bleeding and respiratory failure. Factors found to be univariably associated with ICU readmission were preoperative hemoglobin, preoperative aspartate aminotransferase, preoperative atrial fibrillation, preoperative dialysis, longer cardiopulmonary bypass times, and higher intraoperative allogeneic blood transfusion requirements. Multivariable analysis revealed ICU readmission to be independently associated with preoperative dialysis (odds ratio, 12.86; 95% confidence interval, 3.16-52.28; P < .001). Overall mortality at 1 year was 22.6%. Survival after hospital dismissal was worse for patients who required ICU readmission during the index hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-4.81; P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: ICU readmission after LVAD implantation occurred relatively frequently and was significantly associated with 1-year mortality after hospital dismissal. These data can perhaps be used to identify subsets of LVAD patients at risk for ICU readmission and may lead to implementation of practice changes to mitigate ICU readmissions. Future larger and prospective studies are warranted.