Pain management in German hospices: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pain management is a necessary component of palliative care as most patients suffer from pain during the final phase of life. Due to the complex causation of pain in the last phase of life, it is important to utilize methods other than pharmacotherapeutic options in order to achieve adequate pain control. As little is known about treatment of pain in German hospices, a nationwide survey was conducted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All German hospices (259) were contacted by post in June 2020 and asked to participate in an anonymous cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: A total of 148 (57%) German hospices took part in the survey. A broad variety of medication is used in the hospice setting. Metamizole is the most commonly used non-opiod analgesic , hydromorphone the most commonly used opioid, and pregabalin is the most commonly prescribed co-analgesic drug. The pain medication is usually prescribed as an oral slow-release substance. Standardized treatment schemes are rare among the responding hospices. Most of the respondents also use complementary treatment options, such as aroma (oil) therapy or music therapy, in the treatment of pain. Palliative sedation is used by nearly all responding hospices if all other treatment options fail. CONCLUSION: This survey provides an overview of the treatment options for pain management in German hospices. A broad variety of pain medication is used. Compared to international literature, it is debatable whether such a large variety of different types of pain medication is necessary, or whether a reduction in the type of medication available and the use of standardized treatment schemes could benefit everyone involved.

[Pain management in German specialized outpatient palliative care : A cross-sectional study to present the current pain management of palliative patients in the home environment]. / Schmerztherapie in der deutschen spezialisierten ambulanten Palliativversorgung : Eine Querschnittsstudie zur Darstellung der aktuellen schmerzmedizinischen Versorgung von palliativen Patienten im häuslichen Umfeld.

BACKGROUND: With the help of specialized outpatient palliative care teams (German abbreviation: SAPV), seriously ill and dying patients in Germany can be adequately cared for in their home environment until the end of their lives; however, there are no uniform standards or guidelines for well-executed pain management right now. OBJECTIVE: This approach serves as basic research in the field of public health research. This is intended to present which methods (use of different professional groups, use of pain medications, alternative medical treatment etc.) the individual SAPV teams use for pain management. From this it can be deduced which procedures can be considered particularly effective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in May 2021. All German SAPV teams (n = 307) listed on the homepage of the German Association for Palliative Medicine (DGP) were contacted by post and invited to participate. A total of 175 teams (57%) responded to the request and were included in the evaluation. A descriptive data analysis was performed. RESULTS: Pain management in the German outpatient care of palliative patients is based on several components. All common pain medications are used, but primarily metamizole (99.4%) as a non-opioid analgesic, morphine (98.3%) from the opiate series and pregabalin (96.6%) as a co-analgesic are mainly prescribed. If pain therapy fails, 22.5% of the SAPV teams perform palliative sedation for symptom control on a regular basis. CONCLUSION: This cross-sectional study is the first of its kind to provide a general overview of the treatment options for pain management in German outpatient palliative care. In comparison with international studies, the question arises as to whether uniform therapy schemes and a reduction in the medication available in the individual SAPV teams could lead to an improvement in patient care.

[Physical therapy and occupational therapy in German palliative care: Where do we stand?] / Physio- und Ergotherapie in der deutschen Palliativmedizin ­ wo stehen wir?

INTRODUCTION: Physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) as supportive forms of treatment in palliative care, together with other treatment measures, can create participation for seriously ill patients in the form of a life that is as autonomous as possible until the end of life. However, specially trained staff are needed for the care of palliative patients in order to do justice to the clients' special life situation. In Germany, no corresponding survey on the subject has so far been conducted. So it is unclear to what extent PT and OT are offered in palliative care structures in this country, which tasks are assigned to the respective professional groups, and what the level of knowledge is that caregivers have about treatment options. AIM: Compilation of an overview of the provision, need and use of PT and OT in the various areas of palliative care in Germany. If there is a lack of provision, the reasons for this will be identified. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, a self-designed 9-item questionnaire was sent out to a total of 260 hospices, 323 palliative care units and 304 specialized outpatient palliative care services (SOPC) listed on the homepage of the German Society for Palliative Medicine (DGP). The respondents' answers were analysed using a purely descriptive approach. RESULTS: The response rate was 439 (49.5%). A total of 434 questionnaires (49%) were included in the analysis. A heterogeneous distribution of PT and OT offers between outpatient, inpatient, and hospice palliative care can be seen, with the outpatient area showing a significantly fewer offerings. 29% of the SOPC teams can offer neither PT nor OT. This is mostly due to a shortage of skilled workers or a lack of funding opportunities. The different areas of responsibility of physiotherapists and occupational therapists are known to the majority of respondents (hospice 87%, palliative care unit 83%, SOPC 81%) and are also reflected in the distribution of tasks between the two professional groups. Especially palliative care units and SOPC teams state that they would like to offer more PT and OT (palliative care units 42% more PT and 58% more OT; SOPC 65% more PT and 50% more OT). DISCUSSION: This cross-sectional survey is the first of its kind to provide an overview of the PT and OT offerings in the different sectors of German palliative care. In a comparison of the two forms of therapy, occupational therapists are used less frequently than physiotherapists. An international comparison of the study situation also shows that the use of OT in palliative care, in particular, has not yet been implemented satisfactorily. Outside Germany, the main reasons for this are a shortage of specialists and a lack of knowledge about the tasks of OT. CONCLUSION: PT and OT are frequently used treatment options in all areas of German palliative care. In order to better classify structural problems in care, further differentiated surveys should be conducted. Furthermore, a better knowledge base should be created through research and information activities of both professional groups in palliative care.