ABSTRACT
ESB1609 is a small-molecule sphingosine-1-phosphate-5 receptor-selective agonist designed to restore lipid homeostasis by promoting cytosolic egress of sphingosine-1-phosphate to reduce abnormal levels of ceramide and cholesterol in disease. A phase 1 study was conducted in healthy volunteers to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ESB1609. Following single oral doses, ESB1609 demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for formulations containing sodium laurel sulfate. Plasma and CSF median time to maximum drug concentration (tmax ) were reached by 4-5 hours and 6-10 hours, respectively. The delay in achieving tmax in CSF relative to plasma, likely due to the high protein binding of ESB1609, was also observed in 2 rat studies. Continuous CSF collection via indwelling catheters confirmed that a highly protein-bound compound is measurable and established the kinetics of ESB1609 in human CSF. Mean plasma terminal elimination half-lives ranged from 20.2 to 26.8 hours. The effect of either a high-fat or standard meal increased maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity compared to the fasted state by 2.42-4.34-fold higher, but tmax and half-life remained the same irrespective of fed state. ESB1609 crosses the blood-brain barrier with CSF:plasma ratios ranging between 0.04% and 0.07% across dose levels. ESB1609 demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile at exposures expected to be efficacious.
Subject(s)
Fasting , Humans , Animals , Rats , Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptors , Administration, Oral , Area Under CurveABSTRACT
Relative to healthy subjects, patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension often present with decreased respiratory muscle strength, resulting in decreased maximum inspiratory pressure. Little is known about the impact of reduced respiratory muscle strength on the ability to achieve the peak inspiratory pressures needed for effective drug delivery when using portable dry powder inhalers (≥1.0 kPa). The objective of this study was to assess the impact of inhaler resistance and patient instruction on the inspiratory flow profiles of pulmonary arterial hypertension patients when using breath-actuated dry powder inhalers. The inspiratory flow profiles of 35 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension were measured with variants of the RS01 dry powder inhaler. Profiles were determined with a custom inspiratory flow profile recorder. Results showed that going from the low resistance RS01 dry powder inhaler to the high resistance AOS® dry powder inhaler led to increases in mean peak inspiratory pressures for pulmonary arterial hypertension subjects from 3.7 kPa to 6.5 kPa. Instructions that ask pulmonary arterial hypertension subjects to inhale with maximal effort until their lungs are full led to a mean peak inspiratory pressures of 6.0 kPa versus 2.1 kPa when the same subjects are asked to inhale comfortably. Significant decreases in mean peak inspiratory pressures are also observed with decreases in lung function, with a mean peak inspiratory pressures of 7.2 kPa for subjects with FEV1 > 60% predicted, versus 3.3 kPa for those subjects with FEV1 < 50% predicted. In conclusion, despite having reduced respiratory muscle strength, subjects with pulmonary arterial hypertension can effectively use a breath-actuated dry powder inhaler. The probability of achieving effective dose delivery may be increased by using dry powder inhalers with increased device resistance, particularly when subjects do not follow the prescribed instructions and inhale comfortably.
ABSTRACT
Over the last two decades treatment options have drastically improved for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In the recent times, there is renewed interest in dry powder inhaler (DPI) based inhaled therapies in the treatment of PAH. PAH patients are well known to have respiratory and other muscle weakness either related to the disease itself or due to the underlying diseases like connective tissue disease (CTD). CTD PAH patients are at particular disadvantage as there is a concern if they have enough strength to press the buttons on the inhaler device, needed to pierce the drug capsule inside the device. Additionally, CTD PAH patients develop hand deformities making it difficult to use devices. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically examine the pinch force strength needed to pierce the capsule in DPI devices in patients with PAH. We enrolled 35 patients and our results showed that all PAH patients were able to generate enough pinch strength needed to pierce the capsule regardless of the etiology of PAH.
ABSTRACT
Background: RT234 (vardenafil inhalation powder) is being developed for pulmonary administration "as needed", to acutely improve exercise tolerance and symptoms in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Methods: This single-center, open-label, randomized study in 32 healthy adult subjects evaluated single and multiple inhalation doses of RT234, for safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PKs). Results: RT234 was generally safe and well tolerated at single doses of 0.2-2.4 mg and after repeated dose administration of up to 2.4 mg q4h for four doses daily for 9 days. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were mild-to-moderate headaches. There was no evidence of pulmonary irritation or inflammation. Vardenafil was absorbed very rapidly after inhalation as RT234, independent of dose level and number of doses administered. The tmax occurred at the time that the first blood sample following completion of dosing. After Cmax was achieved, plasma vardenafil concentrations declined rapidly in an exponential fashion that appeared to be parallel among dose levels. Vardenafil plasma concentrations and PK parameters increased in a dose-proportional manner. Vardenafil systemic exposure was notably greater after oral administration of 20 mg vardenafil tablets (Levitra®) than after administration of any dose level of RT234. During repeated dose administration of RT234, Cmax was attained rapidly following each dose and in a pattern similar to that observed after single-dose administration. Minor accumulation, characterized by very low mean morning predose vardenafil concentrations (<0.5 ng/mL), occurred after q4h dosing of up to four doses per day for 9 days. Taken together, these findings show that no clinically important vardenafil accumulation is likely after repeated-dose administration of RT234. Mean vardenafil t1/2 values were comparable after single- and repeated-dose administration. Conclusions: Comparative plasma vardenafil bioavailability data from this study provide scientific justification for reliance on Food and Drug Administration findings for Levitra tablets. These findings support further evaluation of RT234 for as-needed treatment of patients with PAH. The Clinical Trials Registration number is ACTRN12618001077257.
