Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 26(13): 3193-3201, 2020 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32205463

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Preclinical data suggest that radiotherapy (RT) is beneficial in combination with immune checkpoint blockade. Clinical trials have explored RT with single-agent immune checkpoint blockade, but no trials have reported RT with the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase 1 study of patients with stage IV melanoma receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab with two different dose-fractionation schemes of RT. Patients had at least one melanoma metastasis that would benefit from palliative RT and one metastasis that would not be irradiated. Nivolumab 1 mg/kg + ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and extracranial RT with a dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions was administered in Cohort A, and then 27 Gy in 3 fractions was administered in Cohort B. The primary outcome was safety. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated (10 in each cohort). The rates of treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events in Cohort A and B were 40% and 30%, respectively. There were no grade ≥3 adverse events attributed to RT. Patients responded to treatment outside of the irradiated volume (Cohort A 5/10; Cohort B 1/9). No evaluable patients had progression of irradiated metastases. Immunologic changes were seen in the peripheral blood with increases in T-cell receptor diversity in some responding patients. CONCLUSIONS: RT with nivolumab and ipilimumab was safe compared with historical data of nivolumab and ipilimumab alone. Immunologic effects were observed in the peripheral blood. Randomized studies are ongoing to assess whether RT increases the efficacy of nivolumab and ipilimumab.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Biomarkers , Chemoradiotherapy , Female , Humans , Ipilimumab/administration & dosage , Male , Melanoma/etiology , Melanoma/mortality , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Control Release ; 271: 139-148, 2018 02 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29277680

ABSTRACT

Liposomal nanoparticles are the most commonly used drug nano-delivery platforms. However, recent reports show that certain pegylated liposomal nanoparticles (PLNs) and polymeric nanoparticles have the potential to enhance tumor growth and inhibit antitumor immunity in murine cancer models. We sought herein to identify the mechanisms and determine whether PLN-associated immunosuppression and tumor growth can be reversed using alendronate, an immune modulatory drug. By conducting in vivo and ex vivo experiments with the immunocompetent TC-1 murine tumor model, we found that macrophages were the primary cells that internalized PLN in the tumor microenvironment and that PLN-induced tumor growth was dependent on macrophages. Treatment with PLN increased immunosuppression as evidenced by increased expression of arginase-1 in CD11b+Gr1+ cells, diminished M1 functionality in macrophages, and globally suppressed T-cell cytokine production. Encapsulating alendronate in PLN reversed these effects on myeloid cells and shifted the profile of multi-cytokine producing T-cells towards an IFNγ+ perforin+ response, suggesting increased cytotoxic functionality. Importantly, we also found that PLN-encapsulated alendronate (PLN-alen), but not free alendronate, abrogated PLN-induced tumor growth and increased progression-free survival. In summary, we have identified a novel mechanism of PLN-induced tumor growth through macrophage polarization and immunosuppression that can be targeted and inactivated to improve the anticancer efficacy of PLN-delivered drugs. Importantly, we also determined that PLN-alen not only reversed protumoral effects of the PLN carrier, but also had moderate antitumor activity. Our findings strongly support the inclusion of immune-responsive tumor models and in-depth immune functional studies in the preclinical drug development paradigm for cancer nanomedicines, and the further development of chemo-immunotherapy strategies to co-deliver alendronate and chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer.


Subject(s)
Alendronate/administration & dosage , Immune Tolerance , Macrophages/immunology , Nanoparticles/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/immunology , Polyethylene Glycols/analysis , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Female , Liposomes , Male , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Transgenic , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Tumor Burden
4.
Nanomedicine ; 11(2): 259-62, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25200609

ABSTRACT

Liposomes have tremendous potential as drug carriers in the treatment of cancer. However, despite enhanced tumor drug delivery and decreased toxicity, patient survival rates have not improved significantly compared to corresponding free drug treatments. Importantly, we found that a liposomal nanoparticle currently used as a drug carrier in cancer patients enhanced tumor growth in an immune competent murine model of cancer. This was associated with increased tumor angiogenesis and suppression of antitumor immune responses as indicated by decreased cytokine production by tumor macrophages and cytotoxic T cells, diminished tumor infiltration of tumor-specific T cells, and decreased number of dendritic cells in tumor draining lymph nodes. These results suggest that carrier-induced immunosuppression and angiogenesis have the potential to reduce the antitumor effects of drugs loaded within. These findings may have significant implications for the current use and future development of anticancer nanoparticles and further investigations are urgently needed. FROM THE CLINICAL EDITOR: This study discusses important implications of nanoliposome-based drug delivery systems in cancer therapy, and demonstrates that nanoliposomes may have immunosuppressive and angiogenetic properties, directly counterbalancing their anti-cancer activity, which may also have important clinical implications related to more widespread applications of such systems.


Subject(s)
Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Drug Carriers/adverse effects , Liposomes/adverse effects , Animals , Drug Carriers/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Liposomes/administration & dosage , Mice , Nanoparticles/administration & dosage , Nanoparticles/adverse effects , Neovascularization, Pathologic/chemically induced , Neovascularization, Pathologic/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...