ABSTRACT
Incisional hernias are a common complication of abdominal surgery. Research shows that their incidence reaches 10%-11% of the total number of patients subject to laparotomy. Recurrent hernias are the main complication of eventrations and its rate ranges from 5 to 54%, depending on both the surgical procedure used and the follow-up methods. The goal of this study is the comparative cost analysis of two procedures used in the treatment of event rations, tissular versus alloplastic, the former, leading very often to recurrence requiring a new surgical intervention. The analysis comprised 156 cases of surgeries performed for incisional hernia in 2007 in the clinic of Surgery III, SUUB (Bucharest University Emergency Hospital). Tissular procedures were used in 42 cases and prosthetic procedures in 114 cases. The medium-term postoperative follow-up has revealed 17 relapses (40.4%) in the tissular batch and no relapse in the batch where parietal prosthesis was used. If the short-term costs of the tissular procedures are low as compared with the prosthetic procedures, on the medium-term the costs increase by 24.35% due to the high rate of relapses of tissular procedures. Therefore, the tissular procedure must be abandoned due to the high rate of relapse, as this drives additional costs required for the alloplastic repair of the abdominal parietal defects in a subsequent surgical intervention.
