Low Versus High Vacuum Suction Drainage of the Submuscular Pocket in Primary Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Placement of suction drainage in submuscular pockets is routinely performed in breast reconstruction. Days of drain permanence (DDP) are associated with hospital stay and related health care costs. The aims of this study are to retrospectively compare data related to DDP and total drainage volume between high and low vacuum suction drainage groups and to identify correlations with patient or surgery-related factors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 100 patients undergoing immediate or delayed breast reconstruction with expanders and implants. We considered 2 groups depending on suction pressure applied by 2 different surgical teams: group A (number, 50 patients) with high vacuum suction and group B (number, 50 patients) with low vacuum suction. RESULTS: Days of drain permanence was not significantly different between group A and group B (P = 0.451). The same was found for total drainage volume (P = 0.183). The distribution of DDP was statistically different only between patients with or without intraoperative bleeding in group A (P = 0.005) and smoking or nonsmoking patients in group A (P = 0.045). Statistical significance was kept in multivariate regression. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in DDP and total drainage volume using low or high vacuum suction drainage in breast reconstruction. The only factors affecting drainage permanence were intraoperative filling of expander, smoking, and intraoperative bleeding. Therefore, we can reduce the DDP, avoiding overfilling of expander and using of high vacuum suction in nonsmoking patients and in patients with significant intraoperative bleeding.

Venous Graft for Full-thickness Palpebral Reconstruction.

Full-thickness palpebral reconstruction is a challenge for most surgeons. The complex structures composing the eyelid must be reconstructed with care both for functional and cosmetic reasons. It is possible to find in literature different methods to reconstruct either the anterior or posterior lamella, based on graft or flaps. Most patients involved in this kind of surgery are elderly. It is important to use easy and fast procedures to minimize the length of the operation and its complications. In our department, we used to reconstruct the anterior lamella by means of a Tenzel or a Mustardé flap, whereas for the posterior lamella, we previously utilized a chondromucosal graft, harvested from nasal septum. Thus, these procedures required general anesthesia and long operatory time. We started using a vein graft for the posterior lamella. In this article, we present a series of 9 patients who underwent complex palpebral reconstruction for oncological reasons. In 5 patients (group A), we reconstructed the tarsoconjunctival layer by a chondromucosal graft, whereas in 4 patients (group B), we used a propulsive vein graft. The follow-up was from 10 to 20 months. The patient satisfaction was high, and we had no relapse in the series. In group A, we had more complications, including ectropion and septal perforations, whereas in group B, the operation was faster and we noted minor complications. In conclusion, the use of a propulsive vein to reconstruct the tarsoconjunctival layer was a reliable, safe, and fast procedure that can be considered in complex palpebral reconstructions.

Primary dermal melanoma in a patient with a history of multiple malignancies: a case report with molecular characterization.

INTRODUCTION: Primary dermal melanoma (PDM) is a recently described clinical entity accounting for less than 1% of all melanomas. Histologically, it is located in the dermis or subcutaneous tissue, and it shows no connections with the overlying epidermis. The differential diagnosis is principally made along with that of metastatic cutaneous melanoma. CASE REPORT: A 72-year-old Caucasian woman with a history of multiple cancers (metachronous bilateral breast cancer, meningioma, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, uterine fibromatosis and intestinal adenomatous polyposis), came to our attention with a nodular lesion on her back. After removal of the lesion, the histology report indicated malignant PDM or metastatic malignant melanoma. The clinical and instrumental evaluation of the patient did not reveal any other primary tumour, suggesting the primitive nature of the lesion. The absence of an epithelial component argued for a histological diagnosis of PDM. Subsequently, the patient underwent a wide surgical excision with sentinel node biopsy, which was positive for metastatic melanoma. Finally, the mutational status was studied in the main genes that regulate proliferation, apoptosis and cellular senescence. No pathogenetic mutations in CDKN2A, BRAF, NRAS, KRAS, cKIT, TP53 and PTEN genes were observed. This suggests that alternative pathways and low-frequency alterations may be involved. CONCLUSIONS: The differential diagnosis between PDM and isolated metastatic melanoma depends on the negativity of imaging studies and clinical findings for other primary lesions. This distinction is important because 5-year survival rates in such cases are higher than in metastatic cases (80-100 vs. 5-20%, respectively).