Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 36(4): 489, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38880780
2.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; : 10406387241249677, 2024 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702950
3.
Can Vet J ; 64(7): 607, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37397688
4.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 35(4): 347-348, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37409389
6.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 35(4): 345-346, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36964698
7.
Can Vet J ; 64(2): 105, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36733645

Subject(s)
Animals
8.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 35(1): 12, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36511623
9.
10.
11.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 31(3): 317, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31084343
13.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 28(5): 485, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27578871
14.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 28(4): 360, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27381193
15.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 28(3): 196-7, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27138233
16.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 28(2): 87, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26965227
18.
Can Vet J ; 56(2): 149-52, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25694663

ABSTRACT

In January, 2014, increased mortality was reported in piglets with acute diarrhea on an Ontario farm. Villus atrophy in affected piglets was confined to the small intestine. Samples of colon content were PCR-positive for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV). Other laboratory tests did not detect significant pathogens, confirming this was the first case of PED in Canada.


Premier cas de diarrhée épidémique porcine au Canada. En janvier 2014, une mortalité accrue a été signalée chez des porcelets atteints de diarrhée aiguë dans une ferme de l'Ontario. L'atrophie des villosités chez les porcelets touchés a été confinée au petit intestin. Des échantillons du contenu du côlon étaient positifs par RCP pour le virus de la diarrhée épidémique porcine (VDEP). D'autres tests de laboratoire n'ont pas détecté d'agents pathogènes importants, ce qui confirme qu'il s'agit du premier cas de DEP au Canada.(Traduit par Isabelle Vallières).


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Diarrhea/veterinary , Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus , Animals , Canada/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/pathology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Diarrhea/virology , Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology , Gastrointestinal Tract/virology , Swine
19.
J Med Toxicol ; 6(2): 172-184, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20393823

ABSTRACT

Following the outbreak of pet food-induced nephrotoxicity in March 2007, a voluntary online survey of all AAVLD-accredited laboratories, commercial laboratories, and veterinary clinics across North America was conducted. There was no information on toxicity of melamine or factors affecting the disease outcome following exposure to melamine in pets. Data were collected from affected pets to learn about the disease outcome and the affected pet population. The web-based electronic survey used the online tool, Survey Monkey™. Data were collected between April 5 and October 31, 2007. Four hundred fifty-one cases of 586 reported cases met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Most reported cases were from California, Texas, Michigan, Florida, and Ontario. Of the 451 cases, 424 were reported as affected. Of these, 278 cases (65.6%) were cats and 146 (34.4%) were dogs. A total of 278 pets (171 cats and 107 dogs) were reported to have died (a ratio of 1.6:1). However, within species, there was a higher percentage of deceased dogs (73.3%) than cats (61.5%). Of the affected pet population, older male cats with preexisting disease conditions were more likely to be deceased. Analysis of the pets in this large database of naturally affected pets yielded interesting findings. It showed that more cats than dogs were affected and also that preexisting renal diseases and old age predicted the most severe outcome (death or euthanasia) than any other factors.


Subject(s)
Animal Diseases/chemically induced , Animal Diseases/epidemiology , Animal Feed/poisoning , Animals, Domestic , Poisoning/epidemiology , Poisoning/veterinary , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Cats , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Dogs , Female , Food Contamination/analysis , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Kidney Diseases/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , North America/epidemiology , Sex Factors , Triazines/analysis , Triazines/poisoning
20.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 19(1): 91-5, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17459839

ABSTRACT

A PCR assay was validated for the detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in porcine lung tissue. The detection limit of the assay was 0.18 colony-forming units/g of lung sample spiked with M. hyopneumoniae. In field validation, 426 pigs from 220 cases were examined for M. hyopneumoniae infection by M. hyopneumoniae PCR and a fluorescent antibody (FA) test. In total, 103 pig lungs (24.2%) were positive in the PCR test, and 69 pig lungs (16.2%) were positive in the FA test, among which, 62 pigs were positive for both PCR and FA test. Most of the PCR-positive but FA test-negative cases had lesions compatible with M. hyopneumoniae infection. With Bayesian modeling, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the PCR were determined to be 97.3% and 93.0%, respectively.


Subject(s)
Lung/microbiology , Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae/isolation & purification , Pneumonia of Swine, Mycoplasmal/diagnosis , Pneumonia of Swine, Mycoplasmal/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Animals , Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae/genetics , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...