Extracellular Calcium Dictates Onset, Severity, and Recovery of Diarrhea in a Child with Immune-Mediated Enteropathy.

Diarrhea causes monovalent and divalent ion losses that can influence clinical outcome. Unlike the losses of monovalent ions, such as Na+, K+, Cl-, and [Formula: see text], which are generally large in quantity (osmoles) and therefore determine the severity of diarrhea, the losses of divalent ions are relatively small in osmoles and are often overlooked during diarrheal treatment. Studies now suggest that despite divalent ions being small in osmoles, their effects are large due to the presence of divalent ion-sensing receptors and their amplifying effects in the gut. As a result, losses of these divalent ions without prompt replacement could also significantly affect the onset, severity, and/or recovery of diarrheal disease. Herein, we report a case of a malnourished child with an immune-mediated enteropathy who developed episodes of "breakthrough" diarrhea with concurrent hypocalcemia while on appropriate immunotherapy. Interestingly, during these periods of diarrhea, stool volume fluctuated with levels of blood Ca2+. When Ca2+ was low, diarrhea occurred; when Ca2+ levels normalized with replacement, diarrhea stopped. Based on this and other observations, a broader question arises as to whether the Ca2+ lost in diarrhea should be replaced promptly in these patients.

Viral Hepatitis in Children: A Through E.

Hepatitis is defined as inflammation of the liver. This inflammation can be acute and self-limited, chronic (leading to cirrhosis and an increased risk for hepatocellular carcinoma), or fulminant (requiring lifesaving liver transplantation). Although there are many causes of hepatitis, this article focuses on the main childhood viral hepatidities: types A, B, C, D, and E. This review discusses the main characteristics of each virus, including salient epidemiology, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention strategies. [Pediatr Ann. 2016;45(12):e420-e426.].

Plasma thyroid hormone concentration is associated with hepatic triglyceride content in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The underlying mechanisms responsible for the development and progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are unclear. Since the thyroid hormone regulates mitochondrial function in the liver, we designed this study in order to establish the association between plasma free T4 levels and hepatic triglyceride accumulation and histological severity of liver disease in patients with T2DM and NAFLD. This is a cross-sectional study including a total of 232 patients with T2DM. All patients underwent a liver MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) to quantify hepatic triglyceride content, and an oral glucose tolerance test to estimate insulin resistance. A liver biopsy was performed in patients with a diagnosis of NAFLD. Patients were divided into 5 groups according to plasma free T4 quintiles. We observed that decreasing free T4 levels were associated with an increasing prevalence of NAFLD (from 55% if free T4≥1.18 ng/dL to 80% if free T4<0.80 ng/dL, p=0.016), and higher hepatic triglyceride accumulation by (1)H-MRS (p<0.001). However, lower plasma free T4 levels were not significantly associated with more insulin resistance or more severe liver histology (ie, inflammation, ballooning, or fibrosis). Decreasing levels of plasma free T4 are associated with a higher prevalence of NAFLD and increasing levels of hepatic triglyceride content in patients with T2DM. These results suggest that thyroid hormone may play a role in the regulation of hepatic steatosis and support the notion that hypothyroidism may be associated with NAFLD. No NCT number required.

Hepatic Steatosis and Insulin Resistance, But Not Steatohepatitis, Promote Atherogenic Dyslipidemia in NAFLD.

CONTEXT: Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, and atherogenic lipoproteins may play an important role. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the contribution of the severity of steatohepatitis to atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients with NAFLD. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. SETTING: The study was conducted at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Patients were recruited from outpatient clinics or from the general population (n = 188). INTERVENTIONS: Measurement of hepatic triglyceride content by magnetic resonance spectroscopy, histology (liver biopsy), metabolic profile by means of an oral glucose tolerance test, and lipoprotein analyses were performed. OUTCOMES: Outcomes measured included standard lipids, lipoprotein subfraction analysis (apolipoprotein B/A1 levels, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size/phenotype, and LDL/high-density lipoprotein subfractions), and insulin resistance. RESULTS: Patients with NAFLD had severe insulin resistance, especially at the level of the adipose tissue, when compared with patients without NAFLD. Despite small differences in triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, patients with NAFLD had a significantly higher plasma apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein A1 ratio (0.66 ± 0.02 vs 0.58 ± 0.02, P = .01) and smaller LDL particle size (216.2 ± 0.7 vs 219.4 ± 1.1 Å, P = .01). Of note, these differences between patients with/without NAFLD were independent of the presence of obesity. Severity of steatohepatitis did not significantly influence the lipoprotein profile. Worse atherogenic dyslipidemia was best predicted by the degree of liver fat accumulation and adipose tissue and systemic insulin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD was associated with a worse atherogenic lipoprotein profile, regardless of similar body mass index and other clinical parameters. We speculate that this lipoprotein profile is driven mostly by liver fat content and insulin resistance and appears not to be worsened by obesity or the severity of liver disease (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis).

High Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Normal Plasma Aminotransferase Levels.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its more severe form with steatohepatitis (NASH) are common in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, they are usually believed to largely affect those with elevated aminotransferases. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of NAFLD by the gold standard, liver magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) in patients with T2DM and normal aminotransferases, and to characterize their metabolic profile. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We recruited 103 patients with T2DM and normal plasma aminotransferases (age, 60 ± 8 y; body mass index [BMI], 33 ± 5 kg/m(2); glycated hemoglobin [A1c], 7.6 ± 1.3%). We measured the following: 1) liver triglyceride content by (1)H-MRS; 2) systemic insulin sensitivity (homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance); and 3) adipose tissue insulin resistance, both fasting (as the adipose tissue insulin resistance index: fasting plasma free fatty acids [FFA] × insulin) and during an oral glucose tolerance test (as the suppression of FFA). RESULTS: The prevalence of NAFLD and NASH were much higher than expected (50% and 56% of NAFLD patients, respectively). The prevalence of NAFLD was higher in obese compared with nonobese patients as well as with increasing BMI (P = .001 for trend). Higher plasma A1c was associated with a greater prevalence of NAFLD and worse liver triglyceride accumulation (P = .01). Compared with nonobese patients without NAFLD, patients with NAFLD had severe systemic (liver/muscle) and, particularly, adipose tissue (fasting/postprandial) insulin resistance (all P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of NAFLD is much higher than previously believed in overweight/obese patients with T2DM and normal aminotransferases. Moreover, many are at increased risk of NASH. Physicians should have a lower threshold for screening patients with T2DM for NAFLD/NASH.

The role of liver fat and insulin resistance as determinants of plasma aminotransferase elevation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

UNLABELLED: Plasma aminotransferases (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) are usually increased in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the factors behind their elevation remain unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the role of insulin resistance (IR) and liver triglyceride content in relation to histology in patients with NAFLD/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with normal or elevated ALT levels. To this end, we enrolled 440 patients, divided into three groups: no NAFLD (n = 60); NAFLD with normal ALT (n = 165); and NAFLD with elevated ALT (n = 215). We measured: (1) liver fat by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS); (2) severity of liver disease by biopsy (n = 293); and (3) insulin sensitivity in liver, muscle, and adipose tissue by a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp with 3-(3)H-glucose. Patients with NAFLD and elevated ALT, even when well matched for body mass index to those with normal ALT, had worse adipose tissue insulin resistance (ATIR; P < 0.0001), higher liver triglyceride content (P < 0.0001), and lower plasma adiponectin (P < 0.05), but no differences in hepatic insulin resistance. Similar results were found when only patients with NASH were compared: both ATIR (P < 0.0001) and liver triglyceride content by (1)H-MRS (P < 0.0001) were worse in NASH with elevated ALT. Consistent with the (1)H-MRS data, steatosis on liver biopsy was also significantly increased in patients with NASH and elevated ALT levels (P < 0.0001). However, and most important, there were no differences in inflammation (P = 0.62), ballooning (P = 0.13), or fibrosis (P = 0.12). CONCLUSION: In patients with NAFLD or NASH, ATIR (but not HIR) and liver triglyceride content are major factors in the elevation of plasma aminotransferase levels. Patients with normal versus elevated ALT had similar severity of NASH, suggesting that plasma aminotransferase levels are misleading parameters for guiding clinical management.

Relationship of vitamin D with insulin resistance and disease severity in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The role of plasma vitamin D deficiency in the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and steatohepatitis (NASH) remains poorly understood. Previous studies have suggested a role for vitamin D deficiency in the pathogenesis of NAFLD/NASH, but they have been rather small, and/or NAFLD was diagnosed using only aminotransferases or liver ultrasound. This study aimed to assess the role of vitamin D deficiency in relationship to liver fat accumulation and severity of NASH. METHODS: A total of 239 patients were recruited and state-of-the-art techniques were used to measure insulin resistance (euglycemic insulin clamp with 3-(3)H-glucose), liver fat accumulation (magnetic resonance spectroscopy or (1)H-MRS), total body fat (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry), and severity of liver disease (liver biopsy). RESULTS: Patients were divided into 3 groups according to plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (normal: >30 ng/ml; insufficiency: 20-30 ng/ml; deficiency: <20 ng/ml). When well-matched for clinical parameters (BMI, total adiposity, or prevalence of prediabetes/type 2 diabetes), no significant differences were observed among groups in terms of skeletal muscle, hepatic, or adipose tissue insulin sensitivity, the amount of liver fat by (1)H-MRS, or the severity of histological inflammation, ballooning, or fibrosis. Patients were then divided according to liver histology into those with definite NASH and those without NASH. Although patients with NASH had higher insulin resistance, plasma vitamin D concentrations were similar between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that plasma vitamin D levels are not associated with insulin resistance, the amount of liver fat accumulation, or the severity of NASH.

High Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Normal Plasma Aminotransferase Levels.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: NAFLD, and its more severe form with steatohepatitis (NASH), are common in patients with T2DM. However, they are usually believed to affect largely those with elevated aminotransferases. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of NAFLD (by the gold-standard liver magnetic resonance and spectroscopy or (1)H-MRS) in patients with T2DM and normal aminotransferases, and to characterize their metabolic profile. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We recruited 103 patients with T2DM and normal plasma aminotransferases (age: 60±8 years, BMI: 33±5 kg/m(2), A1c: 7.6±1.3%). We measured: i) liver triglyceride content by (1)H-MRS; ii) systemic insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR), and iii) adipose tissue insulin resistance (IR), both fasting (as the adipose tissue IR index: fasting plasma FFA x insulin) and during an OGTT (as the suppression of FFA). RESULTS: The prevalence of NAFLD and NASH were much higher than expected (76% and 56%, respectively). The prevalence of NAFLD was higher in obese compared to non-obese patients, as well as with increasing BMI (p=0.03 for trend). Higher plasma A1c was associated with a greater prevalence of NAFLD and worse liver triglyceride accumulation (p<0.01). Compared to non-obese patients without NAFLD, patients with NAFLD had severe systemic (liver/muscle), and particularly, adipose tissue (fasting/postprandial) insulin resistance (all p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of NAFLD is much higher than previously believed in overweight/obese patients with T2DM and normal aminotransferases. Moreover, many are at increased risk of severe liver disease (NASH). Physicians should have a lower threshold for screening patients with T2DM for NAFLD/NASH.