On the organization of receptive fields of retinal spot detectors projecting to the fish tectum: Analogies with the local edge detectors in frogs and mammals.

Responses of ON- and OFF-ganglion cells (GCs) were recorded extracellularly from their axon terminals in the medial sublamina of tectal retino-recipient layer of immobilized cyprinid fish (goldfish and carp). These units were recorded deeper than direction selective (DS) ones and at the same depth where responses of orientation selective (OS) GCs were recorded. Prominent responses of these units are evoked by small contrast spots flickering within or moving across their visual field. They are not selective either to the direction of motion or to the orientation of stimuli and are not characterized by any spontaneous spike activity. We refer to these fish GCs as spot detectors (SDs) by analogy with the frog SD. Receptive fields (RFs) of SDs are organized concentrically: the excitatory center (about 4.5°) is surrounded by opponent periphery. Study of interactions in the RF has shown that inhibitory influences are generated already inside the central RF area. This fact suggests that RFs of SDs cannot be defined as homogeneous sensory zone driven by a linear mechanism of response generation. Physiological properties of fish SDs are compared with the properties of frog SDs and analogous mammalian retinal GCs-local edge detectors (LEDs). The potential role of the SDs in visually guided fish behavior is discussed.

Updated functional segregation of retinal ganglion cell projections in the tectum of a cyprinid fish-further elaboration based on microelectrode recordings.

Single-unit responses of retinal ganglion cells (GCs) were recorded extracellularly from their axonal terminals in the tectum opticum (TO) of the intact fish (goldfish, carp). The depths of retinal units consecutively recorded along the track of the microelectrode were measured. At the depth of around 50 µm, the responses of six types of direction-selective (DS) GCs were regularly recorded. Responses of two types of orientation-selective (OS) GCs and detectors of white and black spots occurred approximately 50 µm deeper. Responses of GCs with dark- and light-sustained activity were recorded deeper than all others, at about 200 µm. The receptive fields of consecutively recorded units overlap, so they analyze the same fragment of the visual scene, focused by eye optic on the photoreceptor raster. The responses of pairs of DS GCs (ON and OFF units that preferred same direction of stimulus movement) and OS GCs (detectors of vertical and horizontal lines) were often simultaneously recorded at one position of the microelectrode. (The paired recordings of certain units amounted about fourth part of all recordings.) This suggests that their axonal arborizations are located close to each other in the tectal retinorecipient layer. Electrophysiological method, thus, allows to indirectly clarify and make precise the morphology of the retino-tectal connections and to establish a morpho-physiological correspondence.

Color properties of the motion detectors projecting to the goldfish tectum.

Interactions between color channels (long-wave (L), middle-wave (M) and short-wave (S)) in the receptive field of direction-selective (DS) and orientation-selective (OS) ganglion cells (GCs) were investigated with combined selective stimulation of pairs of cone types (L and M, L and S, M and S). In the experiments with DS GCs of both ON and OFF types, it was shown that: (1) M and S channels were synergistic relative to each other and opponent to L channel. (2) Three-parameter signal (from L, M and S cones) is transformed to one-parameter signal at the output of DS GC, thus illustrating the principle of univariance. (3) In the experiments with OS GCs, it was shown that L and M channels were synergistic in the OFF-pathway, while the S channel was opponent to them. Our results suggested that photoreceptor synaptic connectivity of the bipolar cells hypothetically involved in the goldfish OS circuitry substantially differs from connectivity of bipolar cells presumably targeting DS GC. (4) To sum up, the results obtained on DS GCs confirmed the plausibility of proposed DS GC wiring diagrams; as to the OS circuitry of fish retina it still remains unclear and needs further investigation.