Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Anaesthesia ; 77(1): 96-104, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34494667

ABSTRACT

The decision-to-delivery interval is a widely used term at non-elective caesarean section. While the definition may appear self-evident, there is no universally agreed consensus about when this period begins and ends. We reviewed the literature for original research utilising the terms 'decision-to-delivery', 'decision-to-incision' or 'incision-to-delivery' and examined definitions used for decision, delivery, incision, as well as any additional time intervals that were assessed. Our analysis demonstrated an inconsistent non-standardised approach to defining these intervals, which might have clinical practice and medicolegal ramifications. We propose that the decision-to-delivery interval should be defined as follows: the interval between the time at which the senior obstetrician makes the decision that a caesarean section is required and the time at which the fetus (or first fetus in the case of multiples) is delivered. The decision time should ideally be recorded contemporaneously in the medical notes or partogram.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/standards , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Time Factors
2.
Am J Phys Anthropol ; 113(3): 305-15, 2000 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11042534

ABSTRACT

Accurate identification of fetal age is important in a wide variety of circumstances. Seventeen anthropometric and radiographic measurements were taken on fetuses between 15 and 42 weeks of gestational age, both with and without pathologic conditions. A full evaluation including radiographic, karyotypic, gross anatomic, and histologic examination of the fetus and placenta identified 72 individuals as nondysmorphic with no signs of chronic uterovascular insufficiency. These specimens served as the control group. Based on least-squares regressions of this group, age-estimation equations were calculated for all variables. Six models were adequately described by linear equations; the remaining 11 required a quadratic term. Based on standard error of the estimate (S(y:x)), skeletal measures proved the most accurate age estimators. Pathologic conditions were shown to have an influence on age estimation indicated by high levels of inaccuracy and, in some instances, significant bias.


Subject(s)
Age Determination by Skeleton/methods , Bone and Bones/pathology , Embryonic and Fetal Development , Gestational Age , Adolescent , Adult , Anthropometry , Bone and Bones/diagnostic imaging , Crown-Rump Length , Humans , Maternal Age , Regression Analysis
3.
Hum Biol ; 69(6): 849-71, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9353979

ABSTRACT

Identifying patterns of fetal growth alteration benefits both the clinician and the researcher. Twenty-four measurements in three variable sets (anthropometric measures, organ weights, and long-bone measures from radiographs) were taken on fetuses both with and without pathological conditions that are suspected to result in growth alteration. In addition, radiographs of each case were examined for the presence or absence of ossification centers. Based on least-squares regressions of the normal group, we calculated standardized residuals for the affected group to identify patterns of growth alteration. A large sample of fetuses between 15 and 42 weeks of gestational age with a variety of pathological conditions is described and evaluated for growth alterations. Symmetric and asymmetric growth alteration was detected in a small part of the sample and was predominantly isolated to fetuses in the late third trimester. Although patterns of growth alteration have been suggested as a means for noninvasive diagnoses of syndromes (such as trisomy 21), no consistent patterns are discernible in the current group. The sample provides a unique opportunity to evaluate fetal growth in terms of the interaction between genetic and environmental influences.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Aberrations/genetics , Congenital Abnormalities/genetics , Embryonic and Fetal Development/genetics , Fetal Growth Retardation/genetics , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Anthropometry , Bone Development/genetics , Case-Control Studies , Congenital Abnormalities/pathology , Female , Fetal Growth Retardation/pathology , Humans , Least-Squares Analysis , Pregnancy
4.
Am J Phys Anthropol ; 92(1): 37-51, 1993 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8238290

ABSTRACT

The effects of changes in nutritional and health status upon bone and enamel development are examined in a sample of 63 rural Guatemalan children (24 females, 39 males). The number of ossified hand-wrist centers at 3 years and the number of linear enamel hypoplasias (LEH) in approximately 0-3 year zones of developing teeth were used to monitor the response of bone mineralization and enamel matrix formation to illness and nutritional supplementation. Numbers of ossified centers and LEH were compared across sex, supplementation, and morbidity groups. Enamel matrix secretion responded positively to increased supplementation. Children who received less than 34.25 kcal/day in supplement had more LEH than those who received more supplement. No differences in ossification status were found between supplementation groups. These data suggest that enamel formation may be more sensitive to changes in nutritional status than is bone mineralization. Disruptions of bone and enamel formation were both associated with frequent illness. Children who were ill more than 3.6% of the time had more LEH and fewer ossified hand-wrist centers than children who were less frequently ill. Conclusions regarding relative environmental sensitivity must take into account the specific aspects of dental and skeletal development examined.


Subject(s)
Bone Development/physiology , Dental Enamel/physiology , Food, Fortified , Nutrition Disorders/physiopathology , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Anthropometry , Bone Density , Bone Diseases, Developmental/etiology , Dental Enamel Hypoplasia/etiology , Female , Guatemala/epidemiology , Hand/anatomy & histology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Morbidity , Nutrition Disorders/complications , Nutrition Disorders/diet therapy , Nutrition Disorders/epidemiology , Rural Population , Sex Factors , Wrist/anatomy & histology
5.
Teratology ; 46(5): 419-27, 1992 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1462246

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces and discusses the use of standardized residuals as a technique for comparing the growth of normal and pathologic human fetuses. Anthropometric measures, radiographic measures, and organ weights were regressed on known gestational age of second- and third-trimester fetuses. Standardized residuals were calculated for a group of potentially growth-impaired fetuses. Use of residuals aids in identification of patterns of growth alteration in specific pathologies. Most important, studying the response of developing organ systems to a variety of insults may elucidate mechanisms of growth regulation in the fetus. We emphasize the special quality of the multivariate measures of the core sample of fetuses from the Akron Children's Hospital collection.


Subject(s)
Embryonic and Fetal Development , Fetus/pathology , Anthropometry , Bone and Bones/pathology , Female , Fetal Growth Retardation/pathology , Gestational Age , Humans , Organ Size , Pregnancy , Regression Analysis , Spine/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...