Can researchers trust ICD-10 coding of medical comorbidities in orthopaedic trauma patients?

Objectives: The 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) coding system may prove useful to orthopaedic trauma researchers to identify and document populations based on comorbidities. However, its use for research first necessitates determination of its reliability. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of electronic medical record (EMR) ICD-10 coding of nonorthopaedic diagnoses in orthopaedic trauma patients relative to the gold standard of prospective data collection. Design: Nonexperimental cross-sectional study. Setting: Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients/Participants: Two hundred sixty-three orthopaedic trauma patients from 2 prior prospective studies from September 2018 to April 2022. Intervention: Prospectively collected data were compared with EMR ICD-10 code abstraction for components of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), obesity, alcohol abuse, and tobacco use (retrospective data). Main Outcome Measurements: Percent agreement and Cohen's kappa reliability. Results: Percent agreement ranged from 86.7% to 96.9% for all CCI diagnoses and was as low as 72.6% for the diagnosis "overweight." Only 2 diagnoses, diabetes without end-organ damage (kappa = 0.794) and AIDS (kappa = 0.798) demonstrated Cohen's kappa values to indicate substantial agreement. Conclusion: EMR diagnostic coding for medical comorbidities in orthopaedic trauma patients demonstrated variable reliability. Researchers may be able to rely on EMR coding to identify patients with diabetes without complications or AIDS. Chart review may still be necessary to confirm diagnoses. Low prevalence of most comorbidities led to high percentage agreement with low reliability. Level of Evidence: Level 1 diagnostic.

Age and socioeconomic status affect access to telemedicine at an urban level 1 trauma center.

OBJECTIVES: Despite clinical and economic advantages, routine utilization of telemedicine remains uncommon. The purpose of this study was to examine potential disparities in access and utilization of telehealth services during the rapid transition to virtual clinic during the coronavirus pandemic. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Outpatient visits (in-person, telephone, virtual-Doxy.me) over a 7-week period at a Level I Trauma Center orthopaedic clinic. INTERVENTION: Virtual visits utilizing the Doxy.me platform. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accessing at least 1 virtual visit ("Virtual") or having telephone or in-person visits only ("No virtual"). METHODS: All outpatient visits (in-person, telephone, virtual) during a 7-week period were tracked. At the end of the 7-week period, the electronic medical record was queried for each of the 641 patients who had a visit during this period for the following variables: gender, ethnicity, race, age, payer source, home zip code. Data were analyzed for both the total number of visits (n = 785) and the total number of unique patients (n = 641). Patients were identified as accessing at least 1 virtual visit ("Virtual") or having telephone or in-person visits only ("No virtual"). RESULTS: Weekly totals demonstrated a rapid increase from 0 to greater than 50% virtual visits by the third week of quarantine with sustained high rates of virtual visits throughout the study period. Hispanic and Black/African American patients were able to access virtual care at similar rates to White/Caucasian patients. Patients of ages 65 to 74 and 75+ accessed virtual care at lower rates than patients ≤64 (P = .003). No difference was found in rates of virtual care between payer sources. A statistically significant difference was found between patients from different zip codes (P = .028). CONCLUSION: A rapid transition to virtual clinic can be performed at a level 1 trauma center, and high rates of virtual visits can be maintained. However, disparities in access exist and need to be addressed.