CAR-Ts redirected against the Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen CD176 mediate specific elimination of malignant cells from leukemia and solid tumors.

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered T cells (CAR-Ts) are investigated in various clinical trials for the treatment of cancer entities beyond hematologic malignancies. A major hurdle is the identification of a target antigen with high expression on the tumor but no expression on healthy cells, since "on-target/off-tumor" cytotoxicity is usually intolerable. Approximately 90% of carcinomas and leukemias are positive for the Thomsen-Friedenreich carbohydrate antigen CD176, which is associated with tumor progression, metastasis and therapy resistance. In contrast, CD176 is not accessible for ligand binding on healthy cells due to prolongation by carbohydrate chains or sialylation. Thus, no "on-target/off-tumor" cytotoxicity and low probability of antigen escape is expected for corresponding CD176-CAR-Ts. Methods: Using the anti-CD176 monoclonal antibody (mAb) Nemod-TF2, the presence of CD176 was evaluated on multiple healthy or cancerous tissues and cells. To target CD176, we generated two different 2nd generation CD176-CAR constructs differing in spacer length. Their specificity for CD176 was tested in reporter cells as well as primary CD8+ T cells upon co-cultivation with CD176+ tumor cell lines as models for CD176+ blood and solid cancer entities, as well as after unmasking CD176 on healthy cells by vibrio cholerae neuraminidase (VCN) treatment. Following that, both CD176-CARs were thoroughly examined for their ability to initiate target-specific T-cell signaling and activation, cytokine release, as well as cytotoxicity. Results: Specific expression of CD176 was detected on primary tumor tissues as well as on cell lines from corresponding blood and solid cancer entities. CD176-CARs mediated T-cell signaling (NF-κB activation) and T-cell activation (CD69, CD137 expression) upon recognition of CD176+ cancer cell lines and unmasked CD176, whereby a short spacer enabled superior target recognition. Importantly, they also released effector molecules (e.g. interferon-γ, granzyme B and perforin), mediated cytotoxicity against CD176+ cancer cells, and maintained functionality upon repetitive antigen stimulation. Here, CD176L-CAR-Ts exhibited slightly higher proliferation and mediator-release capacities. Since both CD176-CAR-Ts did not react towards CD176- control cells, their response proved to be target-specific. Discussion: Genetically engineered CD176-CAR-Ts specifically recognize CD176 which is widely expressed on cancer cells. Since CD176 is masked on most healthy cells, this antigen and the corresponding CAR-Ts represent a promising approach for the treatment of various blood and solid cancers while avoiding "on-target/off-tumor" cytotoxicity.

Systemic Activation of Neutrophils by Immune Complexes Is Critical to IgA Vasculitis.

In IgA vasculitis (IgAV) perivascular deposition of IgA1 immune complexes (IgA-ICs) is traditionally considered the fundamental trigger for polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN)-mediated damage. We propose that IgA-IC deposition, although mandatory, is not sufficient alone for IgAV. Serum IgA-IC levels and IgA-IC binding to PMNs were quantified in IgAV patients and controls. Activation of PMNs was evaluated by neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) release, adherence, and cytotoxicity assays and in a flow system to mirror conditions at postcapillary venules. In vitro results were related to findings in biopsies and a mouse vasculitis model. During acute IgAV flares we observed elevated serum levels of IgA-ICs and increased IgA-IC binding to circulating PMNs. This IgA-IC binding primed PMNs with consequent lowering of the threshold for NETosis, demonstrated by significantly higher release of NETs from PMNs activated in vitro and PMNs from IgAV patients with flares compared with surface IgA-negative PMNs after flares. Blocking of FcαRI abolished these effects, and complement was not essential. In the flow system, marked NETosis only occurred after PMNs had adhered to activated endothelial cells. IgA-IC binding enhanced this PMN tethering and consequent NET-mediated endothelial cell injury. Reflecting these in vitro findings, we visualized NETs in close proximity to endothelial cells and IgA-coated PMNs in tissue sections of IgAV patients. Inhibition of NET formation and knockout of myeloperoxidase in a murine model of IC vasculitis significantly reduced vessel damage in vivo. Binding of IgA-ICs during active IgAV primes PMNs and promotes vessel injury through increased adhesion of PMNs to the endothelium and enhanced NETosis.

Pathogenic Activation and Therapeutic Blockage of FcαR-Expressing Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes in IgA Pemphigus.

Pathomechanisms in IgA pemphigus are assumed to rely on Fc-dependent cellular activation by antigen-specific IgA autoantibodies; however, models for the disease and more detailed pathophysiologic data are lacking. In this study, we aimed to establish in vitro models of disease for IgA pemphigus, allowing us to study the effects of the interaction of anti-keratinocyte IgA with cell surface FcαRs. Employing multiple in vitro assays, such as a skin cryosection assay and a human skin organ culture model, in this study, we present mechanistic data for the pathogenesis of IgA pemphigus, mediated by anti-desmoglein 3 IgA autoantibodies. Our results reveal that this disease is dependent on FcαR-mediated activation of leukocytes in the epidermis. Importantly, this cell-dependent pathology can be dose-dependently abrogated by peptide-mediated inhibition of FcαR:IgA-Fc interaction, as confirmed in an additional model for IgA-dependent disease, that is, IgA vasculitis. These data suggest that IgA pemphigus can be modeled in vitro and that IgA pemphigus and IgA vasculitis are FcαR-dependent disease entities that can be specifically targeted in these experimental systems.

Evidence and impact of neutrophil extracellular traps in malignant melanoma.

Ulceration of melanoma is associated with neutrophil infiltrates and lower survival rates opposite to non-ulcerated melanoma. Neutrophils release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) that are chromatin structures loaded with antimicrobial proteins. Since NETs have been correlated with tumor progression, we investigated whether NETs appear in melanoma and affect melanoma cells. Indeed, human primary melanoma biopsies revealed neutrophils releasing NETs in all of 27 ulcerated melanomas, whereas NETs were absent in all of 7 non-ulcerated melanomas. However, the quantity of intratumoral NETs did not correlate with tumor progression of melanoma. Interestingly, in vitro assays showed that melanoma cells attach to NETs via integrin-mediated adhesion and that NETs inhibit tumor cell migration. Moreover, co-culturing of NETs and melanoma cells had a cytotoxic effect on melanoma cells resulting in necrosis. Hence, we discovered in vitro an antineoplastic role of NETs in melanoma.

Galactose-deficient IgA1 in skin and serum from patients with skin-limited and systemic IgA vasculitis.

BACKGROUND: IgA vasculitis (IgAV) encompasses a systemic form involving kidneys, gut, skin, or joints, and a skin-limited form. One characteristic feature of systemic IgAV is deposition of galactose-deficient IgA1 (GD-IgA1) in kidneys (as in IgA nephropathy). The relevance of GD-IgA1 for cutaneous vasculitis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether GD-IgA1 is deposited perivascularly in systemic and also skin-limited IgAV and whether its serum levels differ between both forms. METHODS: In a case-control study, deposition of GD-IgA1 was analyzed immunohistochemically by KM55 antibody in skin biopsy specimens from 12 patients with skin-limited IgAV and 4 with systemic IgAV. GD-IgA1 levels were compared by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in sera from 15 patients each with skin-limited and systemic IgAV and from 11 healthy individuals. RESULTS: All biopsy samples from systemic IgAV, and also from skin-limited IgAV, revealed perivascular GD-IgA1 deposition. The average GD-IgA1 concentration in serum was significantly higher in systemic IgAV than in skin-limited IgAV, despite overlap between the groups. LIMITATIONS: Although high GD-IgA1 levels may be predictive of systemic IgAV, patient numbers were too low to determine cutoff values for systemic versus skin-limited IgAV. CONCLUSION: Perivascular GD-IgA1 deposition is a prerequisite for systemic and skin-limited IgAV; however, high GD-IgA1 levels in some patients with systemic IgAV suggest a dose-dependent effect of GD-IgA1 in IgAV.