Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Transl Psychiatry ; 6(8): e873, 2016 08 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27552586

ABSTRACT

Posttraumatic stress disorder is characterized by hyperarousal, sensory processing impairments, sleep disturbances and altered fear regulation; phenotypes associated with changes in brain oscillatory activity. Molecules associated with activity-dependent plasticity, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), may regulate neural oscillations by controlling synaptic activity. BDNF synthesis includes production of multiple Bdnf transcripts, which contain distinct 5' noncoding exons. We assessed arousal, sensory processing, fear regulation and sleep in animals where BDNF expression from activity-dependent promoter IV is disrupted (Bdnf-e4 mice). Bdnf-e4 mice display sensory hyper-reactivity and impaired electrophysiological correlates of sensory information processing as measured by event-related potentials (ERP). Utilizing electroencephalogram, we identified a decrease in slow-wave activity during non-rapid eye movement sleep, suggesting impaired sleep homeostasis. Fear extinction is controlled by hippocampal-prefrontal cortical BDNF signaling, and neurophysiological communication patterns between the hippocampus (HPC) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) correlate with behavioral performance during extinction. Impaired fear extinction in Bdnf-e4 mice is accompanied by increased HPC activation and decreased HPC-mPFC theta phase synchrony during early extinction, as well as increased mPFC activation during extinction recall. These results suggest that activity-dependent BDNF signaling is critical for regulating oscillatory activity, which may contribute to altered behavior.


Subject(s)
Arousal/genetics , Brain Waves/genetics , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/genetics , Evoked Potentials/genetics , Sleep/genetics , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/genetics , Animals , Arousal/physiology , Brain Waves/physiology , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/metabolism , Electroencephalography , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Extinction, Psychological/physiology , Fear/physiology , Hippocampus/physiopathology , Mice , Prefrontal Cortex/physiopathology , Prepulse Inhibition , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Reflex, Startle , Sleep/physiology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/physiopathology , Theta Rhythm/genetics , Theta Rhythm/physiology
3.
Chem Biol Interact ; 71(4): 353-65, 1989.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2582540

ABSTRACT

This study demonstrates that whilst some DNA-repair deficiencies can be detected using host cell reactivation of cisplatin (CDDP)-treated adenovirus (Ad5), not all repair deficiencies affected replication of CDDP-treated Ad5 in human cells. A line of fibroblasts (XP25), derived from a patient with a UV-hypersensitive syndrome xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), was found, as previously reported [1], to be deficient in reactivating the treated virus when compared to the apparently repair-proficient human tumor cell lines established from bladder and ovarian carcinomas. However, a testicular teratoma cell line (SuSa), shown previously to be deficient in the repair of guanine-guanine (G-G) intrastrand crosslinks, adenine-guanine (A-G) intrastrand crosslinks and interstrand crosslinks [2], was found to reactivate the treated virus to a similar extent as the repair-proficient ovarian tumor cell line and the similarly repair-proficient RT112 cell line derived from a bladder carcinoma. Therefore, not all repair-deficient cell lines were deficient at CDDP-treated Ad5 reactivation. However, the HCR technique may still prove to be useful as a rapid screen for DNA-repair deficiencies in CDDP-sensitive cells of unknown repair capacity. A CDDP-sensitive ovarian tumor cell line (TR175) was deficient in reactivating CDDP-treated Ad5, whilst another ovarian cell line (TR170) of intermediate CDDP sensitivity reactivated the virus to a marginally higher extent than the other more CDDP-resistant repair proficient ovarian cell line (SKOV3). In addition, sublines of either the SuSa cells or the RT112 cells expressing approximately two-fold levels of resistance or increased sensitivity to CDDP, showed no change in their abilities to reactivate this CDDP-treated virus, compared to their parental lines. CDDP-treated Ad5 was also used as a lethal probe to obtain cell lines specifically deficient in DNA repair. One such deficient line (SKOV3-C3A), derived from the SKOV3 ovarian carcinoma cell line, displayed an unusual biphasic curve for reactivation of the CDDP-treated virus. Further cell lines derived in this novel manner may prove useful in analysing the genetics of CDDP-repair.


Subject(s)
Adenoviridae/growth & development , Cisplatin/pharmacology , DNA Repair , Virus Activation/drug effects , Adenoviridae/drug effects , DNA/drug effects , Female , Humans , Male , Ovarian Neoplasms , Teratoma , Testicular Neoplasms , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Xeroderma Pigmentosum
4.
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol ; 22(4): 401-9, 1986 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3525182

ABSTRACT

The feasibility of using adenovirus 5 as an in vitro probe for chemosensitivity in short-term cultures of human tumors was evaluated using human melanoma cell lines and primary cultures of melanoma biopsies. A convenient immunoperoxidase method was developed for quantitating viral replication 2 days after infection. Two different approaches were explored: the host cell reactivation assay (HCR) using drug-treated virus; and the viral capacity assay using drug-treated cells. The HCR assay detected sensitivity to 5-(3-methyl-1-triazeno)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC) in Mer- (methyl excision repair deficient) cell lines as decreased ability of the cells to replicate MTIC-treated virus. This test should be applicable to DNA-damaging agents and repair-deficient tumors. Adenovirus replicated readily in nonproliferating primary cultures of melanoma biopsies; application of the HCR assays to this material identified one Mer- sample of 11 tested. Herpes viruses were not suitable for use in HCR because herpes simplex virus type 1 failed to distinguish Mer- from Mer+ melanoma cells; and nonproductive infection of MTIC-sensitive lymphoid cells with Epstein-Barr virus yielded an MTIC-resistant cell line. The second assay (viral capacity) involved determination of the inhibition of replication of untreated virus in treated cells. This approach correctly predicted sensitivity to hydroxyurea and deoxyadenosine in melanoma cell lines when compared with clonogenic survival assay. Viral capacity was also inhibited by cytosine arabinoside, fluorouracil, vincristine, adriamycin, 6-mercaptopurine and ionising radiation, and may therefore be useful for detecting sensitivity to a wide range of antitumor agents.


Subject(s)
Adenoviridae/drug effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Melanoma/pathology , Adenoviridae/immunology , Antigens, Viral/analysis , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Cell Division/drug effects , Cell Line , Dacarbazine/analogs & derivatives , Dacarbazine/pharmacology , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...