The Effect of COVID-19 National Lockdown on the Time from Presentation to Surgery of Patients with Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome: Two UK Tertiary Centers' Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if COVID-19 UK lockdown measures resulted in a delay in the presentation and treatment of patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES). METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of patients with surgically treated CES across 3 time periods: April-May 2020 (first lockdown), August-September 2020 (no-lockdown group), and January-February 2021 (second lockdown). Data regarding duration of symptoms, time from referral to admission, time from admission to surgery, and postoperative outcomes were collected. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients (male: 26, female: 30, mean age: 44.3 years) were included in the study (n = 14, n = 18, and n = 24 in the 3 time periods, respectively). There was no significant difference in duration of symptoms across the time periods (12.6 days vs. 8.2 days vs. 3.8 days) (P = 0.16). Nearly all the patients were admitted within 48 hours of referral (n = 55, 98.2%). The majority of patients were operated on within 48 hours: first lockdown (n = 12, 85.7%), no-lockdown (n = 16, 88.9%), and second lockdown (n = 21, 87.5%). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the second lockdown (3.3 days) versus the other 2 time periods (4.4 days and 6.4 days) (P = 0.02). Thirteen complications were present, with dural tear being the most common (n = 6, 10.7%). Majority reported symptom improvement (n = 53, 94.6%), with a similar number discharged home (n = 54, 96.4%). CONCLUSION: Despite the pandemic, patients with CES were promptly admitted and operated on with good outcomes. Shorter duration of hospital stay could be attributed to adaptation of spinal services.

Acute subdural haematoma in the elderly: to operate or not to operate? A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Acute subdural haematoma (ASDH) is a devastating pathology commonly found on CT brain scans of patients with traumatic brain injury. The role of surgical intervention in the elderly has been increasingly questioned due to its associated morbidity and mortality. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to quantify the mortality and functional outcomes associated with surgical management of ASDH in the elderly was performed. DESIGN/SETTING: A multidatabase literature search between January 1990 and May 2020, and meta-analysis of proportions was performed to quantify mortality and unfavourable outcome (Glasgow Outcome scale 1-3; death/ severe disability) rates. PARTICIPANTS: Studies reporting patients aged 60 years or older. INTERVENTIONS: Craniotomy, decompressive craniectomy, conservative management. OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality and functional outcomes (discharge, long-term follow-up (LTFU)). RESULTS: 2572 articles were screened, yielding 21 studies for final inclusion and 15 for meta-analysis. Pooled estimates of mortality were 39.83% (95% CI 32.73% to 47.14%; 10 studies, 308/739 patients, I2=73%) at discharge and 49.30% (95% CI 42.01% to 56.61%; 10 studies, 277/555 patients, I2=63%) at LTFU. Mean duration of follow-up was 7.1 months (range 2-12 months). Pooled estimate of percentage of poor outcomes was 81.18% (95% CI 75.61% to 86.21%; 6 studies, 363/451 patients, I2=45%) at discharge, and 79.25% (95% CI 72.42% to 85.37%; 8 studies, 402/511 patients, I2=66%) at LTFU. Mean duration of follow-up was 6.4 months (range 2-12 months). Potential risk factors for poor outcome included age, baseline functional status, preoperative neurological status and imaging parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes following surgical evacuation of ASDH in patients aged 60 years and above are poor. This constitutes the best level of evidence in the current literature that surgical intervention for ASDH in the elderly carries significant risks, which must be weighed against benefits. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020189508.