Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 47
Filter
1.
Preprint in Spanish | SciELO Preprints | ID: pps-8090

ABSTRACT

In this work, some ideas are presented to use ChatGPT in PRL such as: analyze the history of accidents and risks, supervise real -time job security, provide detailed information on the use of hazardous equipment, make risk simulations, among others . The article highlights the benefits of ChatGPT, such as its accessibility, consistency, efficiency, flexibility, customization and ability to identify patterns and trends. However, some limitations and challenges are also mentioned, such as the need for human supervision, precise data dependence and ethical and privacy concerns. The article concludes that ChatGPT can be a valuable tool for the prevention of occupational hazards, but must be used in combination with other techniques and tools for effective risk prevention. In addition, the importance of considering the social and ethical impacts of technology and of promoting diversity and competition in the artificial intelligence market stands out.


En este trabajo, se presentan ideas para utilizar CHATGPT en PRL como pueden ser: analizar el historial de accidentes y riesgos, supervisar la seguridad laboral en tiempo real, proporcionar información detallada sobre el uso de equipos peligrosos, realizar simulaciones de riesgos, entre otras. El artículo destaca los beneficios de CHATGPT, como su accesibilidad, consistencia, eficiencia, flexibilidad, personalización y capacidad para identificar patrones y tendencias. Sin embargo, también se mencionan algunas limitaciones y desafíos, como la necesidad de supervisión humana, la dependencia de datos precisos y las preocupaciones éticas y de privacidad. El artículo concluye que CHATGPT puede ser una herramienta valiosa para la prevención de riesgos laborales, pero debe ser utilizada en combinación con otras técnicas y herramientas para una prevención efectiva de riesgos. Además, se destaca la importancia de considerar los impactos sociales y éticos de la tecnología y de fomentar la diversidad y la competencia en el mercado de la inteligencia artificial.

2.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 118(9): 1684-1687, 2023 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37146133

ABSTRACT

We aimed to compare internal jugular vein and inferior vena cava ultrasonography as predictors of central venous pressure in cirrhotic patients. We performed ultrasound assessments of the internal jugular vein (IJV) and the inferior vena cava and then invasively measured central venous pressure (CVP). We then compared their correlation with CVP and performed area under the receiver operating characteristic curves to determine which had best sensitivity and specificity. IJV cross-sectional area collapsibility index at 30° correlated better with CVP ( r = -0.56, P < 0.001), and an IJV AP-CI at 30° ≤ 24.8% was better at predicting a CVP ≥8 mm Hg, with 100% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity. Thus, IJV point-of-care ultrasound might be superior than inferior vena cava point-of-care ultrasound as a predictor of CVP in cirrhotic patients.


Subject(s)
Jugular Veins , Liver Cirrhosis , Humans , Jugular Veins/diagnostic imaging , Central Venous Pressure , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/diagnostic imaging
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34242847

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic dramatically increased the number of patients requiring treatment in an intensive care unit or invasive mechanical ventilation worldwide. Delirium is a well-known neuropsychiatric complication of patients with acute respiratory diseases, representing the most frequent clinical expression of acute brain dysfunction in critically ill patients, especially in those undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, delirium incidence ranges from 11% to 80%, depending on the studied population and hospital setting. OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors for the development of delirium in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: We retrospectively studied consecutive hospitalized adult (≥18 y) patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia from March 15 to July 15, 2020, in a tertiary-care hospital in Mexico City. Delirium was assessed by the attending physician or trained nurse, with either the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit or the Confusion Assessment Method brief version, according to the appropriate diagnostic tool for each hospital setting. Consultation-liaison psychiatrists and neurologists confirmed all diagnoses. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model. RESULTS: We studied 1017 (64.2% men; median age, 54 y; interquartile range 44-64), of whom 166 (16.3%) developed delirium (hyperactive in 75.3%); 78.9% of our delirium cases were detected in patients under invasive mechanical ventilation. The median of days from admission to diagnosis was 14 (interquartile range 8-21) days. Unadjusted mortality rates between delirium and no delirium groups were similar (23.3% vs. 24.1; risk ratio 0.962, 95% CI 0.70-1.33). Age (aHR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04; P = 0.006), an initial neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥9 (aHR 1.81, 95% CI 1.23-2.65; P = 0.003), and requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation (aHR 3.39, 95% CI 1.47-7.84; P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for in-hospital delirium development. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium is a common in-hospital complication of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, associated with disease severity; given the extensive number of active COVID-19 cases worldwide, it is essential to detect patients who are most likely to develop delirium during hospitalization. Improving its preventive measures may reduce the risk of the long-term cognitive and functional sequelae associated with this neuropsychiatric complication.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delirium , Adult , Delirium/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Med. crít. (Col. Mex. Med. Crít.) ; 34(5): 273-278, Sep.-Oct. 2020. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1405535

ABSTRACT

Resumen: La ventilación mecánica es común en pacientes críticos. La asincronía paciente-ventilador existe cuando las fases de la respiración administradas por el ventilador no coinciden con las del paciente. Las asincronías son frecuentes e infradiagnosticadas, éstas se han asociado con desenlaces desfavorables como son: mayor duración de ventilación mecánica, estancia en la unidad de terapia intensiva, mortalidad, incomodidad del paciente, alteraciones del sueño y disfunción diafragmática. Esta revisión describe los desenlaces adversos reportados que se han asociado a la presencia de asincronías en pacientes adultos bajo ventilación mecánica invasiva. La evidencia actual sugiere que el mejor enfoque para manejar las asincronías es ajustar la configuración del ventilador y mejorar su detección. Si bien la mayoría de la evidencia proviene de estudios observacionales y ensayos clínicos aleatorizados realizados en poblaciones heterogéneas y con un número limitado de pacientes, los resultados sugieren desenlaces desfavorables clínicamente significativos en los pacientes que experimentan un índice de asincronía elevado. Por lo anterior, es necesario generar mayor evidencia en este tópico.


Abstract: Mechanical ventilation is common in critically ill patients. Patient-ventilator asynchrony exists when the breathing phases administered by the ventilator do not match those of the patient. They are frequent but underdiagnosed, and have been associated with worse outcomes because they negatively affect patient comfort, length of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit and mortality. This review describes the negative outcomes associated with the presence of asynchronies in adult patients with invasive mechanical ventilation. Current evidence suggests that the best approach to handle asynchronies is to adjust the fan settings and improve the quality of detection. While most of this evidence comes from observational studies and randomized clinical trials which were done with heterogeneous populations and a limited number of patients, the results suggest less favorable clinically significant outcomes in patients with asynchronies. So it is necessary to generate more evidence in this topic.


Resumo: A ventilação mecânica é comum em pacientes críticos. A assincronia paciente-ventilador existe quando as fases da respiração fornecida pelo ventilador não coincidem com as do paciente. As assincronas são frequentes e subdiagnosticadas, tendo sido associadas a desfechos desfavoráveis como: maior tempo de ventilação mecânica, permanência em unidade de terapia intensiva, mortalidade, desconforto do paciente, distúrbios do sono e disfunção diafragmática. Esta revisão descreve os resultados adversos relatados que foram associados à presença de assincronia em pacientes adultos sob ventilação mecânica invasiva. A evidência atual sugere que a melhor abordagem para gerenciar assincronias é ajustar as configurações do ventilador e melhorar a detecção do ventilador. Embora a maioria das evidências provenha de estudos observacionais e ensaios clínicos randomizados conduzidos em populações heterogêneas e com um número limitado de pacientes, os resultados sugerem resultados clinicamente desfavoráveis significativos em pacientes que apresentam uma alta taxa de assincronia. Portanto, é necessário gerar mais evidências sobre este tema.

6.
Rev Invest Clin ; 72(3): 165-177, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32584326

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Regional information regarding the characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 is needed for a better understanding of the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study to describe the clinical features of COVID-19 patients diagnosed in a tertiary-care center in Mexico City and to assess differences according to the treatment setting (ambulatory vs. hospital) and to the need of intensive care (IC). METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort, including consecutive patients with COVID-19 from February 26, 2020 to April 11, 2020. RESULTS: We identified 309 patients (140 inpatients and 169 outpatients). The median age was 43 years (interquartile range, 33-54), 59.2% men, and 18.6% healthcare workers (12.3% from our center). The median body mass index (BMI) was 29.00 kg/m2 and 39.6% had obesity. Compared to outpatients, inpatients were older, had comorbidities, cough, and dyspnea more frequently. Twenty-nine (20.7%) inpatients required treatment in the IC unit (ICU). History of diabetes (type 1 or 2) and abdominal pain were more common in ICU patients compared to non-ICU patients. ICU patients had higher BMIs, higher respiratory rates, and lower room-air capillary oxygen saturations. ICU patients showed a more severe inflammatory response as assessed by white blood cell count, neutrophil and platelet count, C-reactive protein, ferritin, procalcitonin, and albumin levels. By the end of the study period, 65 inpatients had been discharged because of improvement, 70 continued hospitalized, and five had died. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with comorbidities, either middle-age obese or elderly complaining of fever, cough, or dyspnea, were more likely to be admitted. At admission, patients with diabetes, high BMI, and clinical or laboratory findings consistent with a severe inflammatory state were more likely to require IC.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Abdominal Pain/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care , Biomarkers/blood , Body Mass Index , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Care , Dyspnea/etiology , Female , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
7.
Rev Invest Clin ; 72(3): 151-158, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32584330

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak is a significant challenge for health-care systems around the world. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the impact of comorbidities on the case fatality rate (CFR) and the development of adverse events in patients positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the Mexican population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the data from 13,842 laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients in Mexico between January 1, 2020, and April 25, 2020. We investigated the risk of death and the development of adverse events (hospitalization, pneumonia, orotracheal intubation, and intensive care unit [ICU] admission), comparing the number of comorbidities of each patient. RESULTS: The patient mean age was 46.6 ± 15.6 years, 42.3% (n = 5853) of the cases were women, 38.8% of patients were hospitalized, 4.4% were intubated, 29.6% developed pneumonia, and 4.4% had critical illness. The CFR was 9.4%. The risk of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] = 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-3.7), pneumonia (OR = 3.02, 95% CI: 2.6-3.5), ICU admission (OR = 2, 95% CI: 1.5-2.7), and CFR (hazard ratio = 3.5, 95% CI: 2.9-4.2) was higher in patients with three or more comorbidities than in patients with 1, 2, or with no comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: The number of comorbidities may be a determining factor in the clinical course and its outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asthma/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Critical Illness , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Male , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Smoking/epidemiology , Young Adult
8.
Rev. invest. clín ; 72(3): 151-158, May.-Jun. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1251849

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak is a significant challenge for health-care systems around the world. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the impact of comorbidities on the case fatality rate (CFR) and the development of adverse events in patients positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the Mexican population. Materials and methods: We analyzed the data from 13,842 laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients in Mexico between January 1, 2020, and April 25, 2020. We investigated the risk of death and the development of adverse events (hospitalization, pneumonia, orotracheal intubation, and intensive care unit [ICU] admission), comparing the number of comorbidities of each patient. Results: The patient mean age was 46.6 ± 15.6 years, 42.3% (n = 5853) of the cases were women, 38.8% of patients were hospitalized, 4.4% were intubated, 29.6% developed pneumonia, and 4.4% had critical illness. The CFR was 9.4%. The risk of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] = 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-3.7), pneumonia (OR = 3.02, 95% CI: 2.6-3.5), ICU admission (OR = 2, 95% CI: 1.5-2.7), and CFR (hazard ratio = 3.5, 95% CI: 2.9-4.2) was higher in patients with three or more comorbidities than in patients with 1, 2, or with no comorbidities. Conclusions: The number of comorbidities may be a determining factor in the clinical course and its outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pregnancy , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Asthma/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Immunocompromised Host , Critical Illness , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Mexico/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology
9.
Rev. invest. clín ; 72(3): 165-177, May.-Jun. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1251851

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Background: Regional information regarding the characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 is needed for a better understanding of the pandemic. Objective: The objective of the study to describe the clinical features of COVID-19 patients diagnosed in a tertiary-care center in Mexico City and to assess differences according to the treatment setting (ambulatory vs. hospital) and to the need of intensive care (IC). Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort, including consecutive patients with COVID-19 from February 26, 2020 to April 11, 2020. Results: We identified 309 patients (140 inpatients and 169 outpatients). The median age was 43 years (interquartile range, 33-54), 59.2% men, and 18.6% healthcare workers (12.3% from our center). The median body mass index (BMI) was 29.00 kg/m2 and 39.6% had obesity. Compared to outpatients, inpatients were older, had comorbidities, cough, and dyspnea more frequently. Twenty-nine (20.7%) inpatients required treatment in the IC unit (ICU). History of diabetes (type 1 or 2) and abdominal pain were more common in ICU patients compared to non-ICU patients. ICU patients had higher BMIs, higher respiratory rates, and lower room-air capillary oxygen saturations. ICU patients showed a more severe inflammatory response as assessed by white blood cell count, neutrophil and platelet count, C-reactive protein, ferritin, procalcitonin, and albumin levels. By the end of the study period, 65 inpatients had been discharged because of improvement, 70 continued hospitalized, and five had died. Conclusions: Patients with comorbidities, either middle-age obese or elderly complaining of fever, cough, or dyspnea, were more likely to be admitted. At admission, patients with diabetes, high BMI, and clinical or laboratory findings consistent with a severe inflammatory state were more likely to require IC.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus , Severity of Illness Index , Biomarkers/blood , Abdominal Pain/epidemiology , Body Mass Index , Comorbidity , Treatment Outcome , Critical Care , Dyspnea/etiology , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Mexico , Obesity/epidemiology
13.
Rev Invest Clin ; 70(6): 310-318, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30532091

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Urine osmolarity (OsmU) is the gold standard for the evaluation of the kidney's urine concentration capacity; nevertheless, urinary density (UD) is often used as a surrogate for its estimation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the accuracy of UD in estimating OsmU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A transversal study including patients with simultaneous determination of UD measured with refractometry and OsmU measured by osmometer (OsmUm). We multiplied the last two digits of the UD by 35, 30, 32, 33.5, and 40 to estimate OsmU; the estimates were considered precise if the value was ± 30 mOsm/kg from the OsmUm. A Bland-Altman analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Among 205 patients, there was no difference between OsmUm and the estimated form when using a factor of 33.5 (p = 0.578). When analyzing by the absence or presence of proteinuria and/or glycosuria, there were no differences when using the factors 35 (p = 0.844) and 32 with adjusted UD (p = 0.898). In the linear correlation analysis, values for Pearson's r = 0.788 and r2 = 0.621 were obtained (p < 0.001). The areas under the curve obtained by the receiver operating characteristics curves to estimate urine osmolarity values < 100 and > 600 mOsm/kg were > 0.90. CONCLUSION: The estimation of the OsmU from UD showed adequate performance. If an osmometer is unavailable, we recommend using the factor 35 for clean samples and 32 with adjusted UD for samples with proteinuria and/or glycosuria.


Subject(s)
Osmolar Concentration , Osmometry/methods , Urinalysis/methods , Urine/chemistry , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Glycosuria/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proteinuria/epidemiology , Refractometry/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
14.
Med. interna Méx ; 34(5): 746-761, sep.-oct. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-984738

ABSTRACT

Resumen: Una primera crisis epiléptica en pacientes adultos es un problema común en la práctica clínica y su manejo representa un desafío para los médicos. El objetivo de esta revisión es proporcionar un abordaje clínico sistemático para la clasificación, diagnóstico y tratamiento de los pacientes que han experimentado una primera crisis porque ello podría auxiliar al clínico a reconocer y tratar apropiadamente esta afección. Debido a que una primera crisis puede tener diversas causas, es esencial identificar si el evento correspondió a una crisis provocada (sintomática aguda) o no provocada. Por tanto, la clasificación adecuada de la crisis es fundamental para establecer la duración del abordaje diagnóstico, la necesidad de una intervención terapéutica y el pronóstico en cada caso. Los pacientes diagnosticados con una crisis única no provocada requieren la realización de un electroencefalograma y una resonancia magnética para estimar el riesgo de recurrencia e identificar a los pacientes que cumplen criterios diagnósticos de epilepsia. Asimismo, se recomienda individualizar el tratamiento con fármacos antiepilépticos para reducir el riesgo de recurrencia temprana (≤ 2 años), debido a que esto puede producir efectos adversos. Por último, señalamos algunas áreas de incertidumbre para incentivar la investigación a futuro en este tema.


Abstract: First seizures in adult patients are a common problem in clinical practice, and their management represents a challenge for physicians. The aim of this review is to develop a systematic clinical approach for the classification, diagnosis and treatment of patients who have experienced a first seizure, which could help clinicians to recognize and treat this condition appropriately. Because these seizures can arise from several etiologies, it is essential to know if the event was a provoked (acute symptomatic) or an unprovoked seizure. Thus, an adequate classification is of utmost importance to establish the length of the diagnosis approach, the necessary treatment and the individual prognosis. Patients diagnosed with a single unprovoked seizure require an electroencephalogram and a brain magnetic resonance imaging to assess the risk of recurrence as well as to identify those patients who meet the diagnosis criteria for epilepsy. We recommend individualized antiepileptic drug therapy to reduce early seizure recurrence (≤ 2 years), even if it can produce some adverse effects. Finally, there are still certain areas of uncertainty to promote future research in this topic.

15.
Metas enferm ; 20(1): 69-76, feb. 2017. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-161325

ABSTRACT

Aunque las vacunas víricas han contribuido notablemente al desarrollo social durante el último siglo y medio, muchos datos indican que los grupos que se oponen a su uso han logrado incidir negativamente sobre las coberturas vacunales en los últimos años, haciendo rebrotar en los países desarrollados ciertas enfermedades que ya se hallaban al borde de la eliminación e incluso provocando indirectamente algunas muertes que podrían haberse evitado. Respondiendo al llamamiento de muchos salubristas preocupados por esta deriva social, el presente artículo pretende difundir información veraz sobre la trascendencia real de las enfermedades que combaten las vacunas víricas, sobre algunos conceptos que ayuden a enjuiciar correctamente su eficacia y su seguridad y sobre las consecuencias que derivan del rechazo a las vacunas incluidas por la autoridad sanitaria en los calendarios de vacunación, tanto para las personas como para la comunidad


Although viral vaccines have contributed noticeably to social development during the past century and a half, there are many data that point to the fact that those groups opposing their use have achieved a negative impact on vaccination coverage during the past years, leading to a new outbreak in developed countries of certain diseases that were on the brink of elimination, and even being the indirect cause of some deaths that could have been prevented. Answering to the call by many health professionals concerned by this social drift, this article intends to provide truthful information on the real importance of those diseases fought against by viral vaccines, about some concepts that help to judge adequately their efficacy and safety, and about the consequences caused by the rejection of those vaccines included by health authorities in vaccination schedules, both for persons and for the community


Subject(s)
Humans , Viral Vaccines , Virus Diseases/prevention & control , Health Education/trends , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Patient Safety , Treatment Refusal/statistics & numerical data
19.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 24(1): 45-56, 2006 Jan.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16537063

ABSTRACT

In the strictest sense, the term "viral hepatitis" includes a series of clinical conditions of infectious origin caused by five phylogenetically unrelated human viruses that have developed specific tropism to hepatocytes. In a broader sense, it also includes acute liver diseases due to infection by other viruses that do not display specific liver tropism, but may produce liver disease as a complication of the infection. Hepatitis B and C viruses have, in addition, developed strategies that allow them to establish long-lasting, chronic infections in some patients. Chronic viral hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and primary liver cancer are the main clinical outcomes of these phenomena of viral persistence, which respond to two main mechanisms: induction of immune tolerance in the host, and emergence and selection of viral mutants that are able to escape the immune response.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis, Viral, Human , Genotype , Hepatitis A virus/genetics , Hepatitis A virus/pathogenicity , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Hepatitis B virus/pathogenicity , Hepatitis Delta Virus/genetics , Hepatitis Delta Virus/pathogenicity , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Hepatitis E virus/pathogenicity , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/epidemiology , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/etiology , Hepatitis, Viral, Human/physiopathology , Humans , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...