Exploring physical activity preferences and motivation in long-term cardiac prevention: An Austrian cross-sectional survey.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients often do not sustain physical activity (PA) behaviour in the long run, once they progress into a self-management stage of secondary prevention. This study aimed to explore former CR patients' PA preferences, determinants (i.e., influencing factors) and motivation for sustained PA engagement. We conducted a cross-sectional multi-centre survey using an original questionnaire based on prior qualitative interviews with cardiac patients. Five CR centres in Austria posted 500 questionnaires to former CR patients who had completed CR approximately three years prior, and 117 patients (23%) responded. Descriptive analysis was used to analyse closed-ended questions, and self-determination theory (SDT) was applied as a qualitative framework to analyse open-ended questions concerning motivation for PA engagement. Patients were generally physically active, but the majority (75.3%) did not fulfil the World Health Organisation's recommendations for aerobic PA and muscle strengthening. Most patients preferred being physically active outdoors (70%), engaging in aerobic-related (95%), individual and non-competitive exercises, with cycling (52%), walking (32%) and hiking (25%) among the most popular activities. Main determinants of PA were health, pain and motivation for 80%, 68%, 67% of patients, respectively. A subset of patients (77%) expanded on their motivations behind PA. According to SDT, most reasons (90%) were regulated by autonomous motivation (either extrinsically autonomously-regulated or intrinsic motivation) and stemmed mostly from health-related goals (e.g., fitness, general health, weight control), future quality-of-life aspirations (e.g., self-sufficiency in old age, presence for loved ones, preserving mobility) and enjoyment of PA. Patients' responses underscore the importance of promoting not only general PA, but also muscle strengthening training in CR interventions to maximise optimal health benefits. Our data further suggest that interventions which are aligned to patients' health goals and foster autonomous motivation may be particularly beneficial in increasing adherence to PA in the long-term.

Use and perceptions of digital technology for daily life, physical activity and health information among former cardiac rehabilitation patients in Austria: A cross-sectional survey.

Objective: Digital health technologies offer great potential to improve access and adherence to cardiovascular disease secondary prevention measures such as regular physical activity (PA). However, the use and perceptions of digital technology (DT) among cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients are not well understood. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the use of DT in former CR patients' daily lives, for PA and for health information; and to gain insight into patient perceptions of DT for PA, including barriers, facilitators and requested features. Methods: A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted between May 2022 and January 2023. Five Austrian CR centres contacted 500 former patients who had completed a phase 2 CR programme from January 2019 onwards. One-hundred seventeen patients (mean [SD] age, 69 ± 10 years, 22% female) responded. Descriptive and thematic analyses were conducted for closed and open-ended questions, respectively. Results: Results indicated high DT usage for communication and informational aspects, and to a large extent also for PA and health information seeking. Main facilitators of DT use for PA were attributed to health and behavioural monitoring. Main barriers were lack of perceived need, lack of interest and poor usability. Most frequently requested features included pulse and blood pressure measurement, step count and compatibility to other devices. Conclusions: Patients generally used and perceived DT as beneficial in daily life and for secondary prevention purposes such as PA. The survey identified facilitators, barriers and feature requests, which may inform the design and implementation of digital health interventions for CR patients.

Effect of digital tools in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation including home training-results of the EPICURE study.

Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide and are partly caused by modifiable risk factors. Cardiac rehabilitation addresses several of these modifiable risk factors, such as physical inactivity and reduced exercise capacity. However, despite its proven short-term merits, long-term adherence to healthy lifestyle changes is disappointing. With regards to exercise training, it has been shown that rehabilitation supplemented by a) home-based exercise training and b) supportive digital tools can improve adherence. Methods: In our multi-center study (ClincalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04458727), we analyzed the effect of supportive digital tools like digital diaries and/or wearables such as smart watches, activity trackers, etc. on exercise capacity during cardiac rehabilitation. Patients after completion of phase III out-patient cardiac rehabilitation, which included a 3 to 6-months lasting home-training phase, were recruited in five cardiac rehabilitation centers in Austria. Retrospective rehabilitation data were analyzed, and additional data were generated via patient questionnaires. Results: 107 patients who did not use supportive tools and 50 patients using supportive tools were recruited. Already prior to phase III rehabilitation, patients with supportive tools showed higher exercise capacity (Pmax = 186 ± 53 W) as compared to patients without supportive tools (142 ± 41 W, p < 0.001). Both groups improved their Pmax, significantly during phase III rehabilitation, and despite higher baseline Pmax of patients with supportive tools their Pmax improved significantly more (ΔPmax = 19 ± 18 W) than patients without supportive tools (ΔPmax = 9 ± 17 W, p < 0.005). However, after adjusting for baseline differences, the difference in ΔPmax did no longer reach statistical significance. Discussion: Therefore, our data did not support the hypothesis that the additional use of digital tools like digital diaries and/or wearables during home training leads to further improvement in Pmax during and after phase III cardiac rehabilitation. Further studies with larger sample size, follow-up examinations and a randomized, controlled design are required to assess merits of digital interventions during cardiac rehabilitation.

Efficacy of extended, comprehensive outpatient cardiac rehabilitation on cardiovascular risk factors: A nationwide registry.

AIM: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a key component of the treatment of cardiac diseases. The Austrian outpatient CR model is unique, as it provides patients with an extended professionally supervised, multidisciplinary program of 4-6 weeks of phase II (OUT-II) and 6-12 months of phase III (OUT-III) CR. The aim of this analysis was to assess the efficacy of the Austrian outpatient CR model using a nationwide registry. METHODS: Data of all consecutive patients (N = 7560) who completed OUT-II and/or OUT-III between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015 were entered prospectively into a registry. OUT-III patients were analyzed separately according to whether the preceding phase II was performed as outpatient (OUT-II/OUT-III, N = 2403) or in-patient (IN-II/OUT-III, N = 2789). All patients underwent assessment of anthropometry, resting blood pressure, lipid profile, fasting blood glucose, exercise capacity, quality of life, anxiety and depression. RESULTS: During OUT-II, patients significantly improved their metabolic risk factor profile and increased exercise capacity by 14.3%. OUT-II/OUT-III patients achieved an additional increase in exercise capacity by 10%, further improvement in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and stabilization of the remaining risk factors. IN-II/OUT-III patients increased their maximal exercise capacity by 18.4% and there was improvement in blood pressure, HDL, low-density lipoprotein and glucose levels. CONCLUSION: Extended, professionally supervised, multidisciplinary outpatient CR in a large nationwide registry of consecutive patients consistently improved maximal exercise capacity and relevant modifiable cardiovascular risk factors beyond effects seen after IN- or OUT-II alone.

Search and rescue response to a large-scale rockfall disaster.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prehospital management and safety of search and rescue (SAR) teams involved in a large-scale rockfall disaster and monitor the acute and chronic health effects on personnel with severe dolomitic dust exposure. METHODS: SAR personnel underwent on-site medical screening and lung function testing 3 months and 3 years after the event. RESULTS: The emergency dispatch center was responsible for central coordination of resources. One hundred fifty SAR members from multidisciplinary air- and ground-based teams as well as geotechnical experts were dispatched to a provisionary operation center. Acute exposure to dolomite dust with detectable silicon and magnesium concentrations was not associated with (sub)acute or chronic sequelae or a clinically significant impairment in lung function in exposed personnel. CONCLUSIONS: The risk for personnel involved in mountain SAR operations is rarely reported and not easily investigated or quantified. This case exemplifies the importance of a multiskilled team and additional considerations for prehospital management during natural hazard events. Safety plans should include compulsory protective measures and medical monitoring of personnel.

Long-term effects of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Austria: a nationwide registry.

AIM: Our Working Group on Out-Patient Cardiac Rehabilitation (AGAKAR) has previously published guidelines, which were endorsed by the Austrian Society of Cardiology. It was the aim of this study to assess the short-term (phase II) and long-term (phase III) effects of these guidelines by use of a nationwide registry. METHODS: All Austrian out-patient rehabilitation facilities entered data into a database of all consecutive patients who completed phase II (4-6 weeks) and/or III (6-12 months) rehabilitation between 1.1.2009-30.11.2011. RESULTS: Data of 1432 phase II and 1390 phase III patients were assessed. Despite the wide spectrum of cardiac diseases patients' exercise capacity improved during phase II by 20 (-193 to 240) watts; 91.0% reached a systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg; 68.1% an LDL <100 mg/dl; 69.8% triglycerides <150 mg/dl, and 66.2% of male patients had a waist circumference <102 cm. During phase III improvement in cardiovascular risk factors, quality of life, anxiety, and depression were further improved in an increasing number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate beneficial short- and long-term effects of the Austrian model of out-patient cardiac rehabilitation and provide support for comprehensive long-term rehabilitation programs. Furthermore, our model might be helpful for those who are at the verge of initiating or modifying their programs. It is also hoped that these data will motivate colleagues to refer their patients to out-patient cardiac rehabilitation facilities and that our results may stimulate insurance companies to grant further and comprehensive contracts to provide access for all suitable patients.

Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: the Austrian model.

Over the past decades undisputable evidence has accumulated identifying the panoply of beneficial effects of exercise training, smoking cessation, blood pressure lowering, glycaemic and lipid control, as well as psycho-social interventions on cardiovascular risk factors, the well-being, morbidity and mortality of patients with cardiac diseases with or without acute events. Nevertheless, despite all the evidence, insurance companies are more than hesitant to provide patients with an adequate infrastructure to allow outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in their community. Whereas some countries still favour in-hospital rehabilitation, others are on the verge of introducing cardiac rehabilitation for the first time. Thanks to the efforts of the Working Group of Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Austrian Cardiac Society, detailed guidelines for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation have been introduced, which not only include aims, contents and duration of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation, but also requirements for staff, quality of care and infrastructure. As a result cardiac rehabilitation in Austria is currently undergoing a transition process from exclusive in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation to a more open approach of granting patients a choice between in-hospital and outpatient rehabilitation. Experience gained appears relevant to a great number of colleagues in many countries Europe - as well as worldwide. Since these guidelines were and still are the basis for implementing outpatient cardiac rehabilitation, they are presented in great detail, so that they may either be applied as is or simply stimulate discussion.

Short-term patient-reported outcomes after different exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes.

BACKGROUND: An objective of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is improvement in patient-reported outcomes such as health-related quality of life as well as anxiety and depressive symptoms. There are no direct comparisons of the effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes on patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: In this non-randomized study we collected patient-reported outcomes data with the MacNew Heart Disease health-related quality of life questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at baseline, 1 month and again 3 months after admission to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in a cohort of 216 consecutive patients enrolled either in a 4-week inpatient exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (n=62) or a 3-month outpatient exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (n=87) and in a usual care group (n=67) to document the natural course in patient-reported outcome variables without exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. RESULTS: Although MacNew health-related quality of life scores improved more with inpatient than outpatient exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation by month 1, the improvement was still significant in both groups at month 3 and also in the usual care group when compared to baseline. The health-related quality of life scores in the inpatient group, however, decreased between month 1 and 3 whereas they continued to improve in the outpatient group. The significant reduction in both anxiety and depressive symptoms in both exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation groups by month 1 was maintained at month 3 only with outpatient exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. No significant changes over the 3 months were observed in the usual care group. CONCLUSION: Significant improvements of 1-month patient-reported outcomes are achieved in patients attending inpatient as well as outpatient exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation when compared with no exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. In contrast to inpatient exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation, however, outpatient exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation leads to a further improvement of patient-reported outcomes. These results suggest that, if patients have to be admitted for inpatient exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation, this programme should be followed by an outpatient exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation to further improve and stabilize these patient-reported outcome variables.

[Cardiac rehabilitation in Austria. A need to treat analysis]. / Kardiologische Rehabilitation in Osterreich. Eine Bedarfsanalyse.

The aim of this analysis is to survey the general demand and current supply of cardiac rehabilitation in Austria on the basis of best evidence practice and to produce recommendations for a cost-effective structure of the entire cardiac rehabilitation system. Following the standards of indication of the Austrian Society of Cardiology an analysis of demand of cardiac rehabilitation has been carried out and juxtaposed with the current supply of facilities for cardiac rehabilitation. According to hospitalizations in the year 2000, 11,630 patients per annum would require inpatient phase II rehabilitation, 6,270 patients institutional based outpatient phase II rehabilitation and 14,319 patients institutional based phase III rehabilitation. In the year 2000, 14,746 patients received treatment in the 9 Austrian inpatient cardiac rehabilitation centres. This number is compared with an annual demand of 11,630 admissions for phase-II treatment. It follows that an equilibrium can be argued for the supply of and demand for inpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Austria. At present, 10 approved institutions in Austria offer outpatient cardiac rehabilitation services. The maximum number of positions for treatment per institution is currently 200-250. Consequently, maximally 2,000-2,500 patients per annum can be treated. In comparison, there exists a calculated demand for 6,270 patients in institutional based outpatient phase II rehabilitation and 14,319 patients in institutional based phase III rehabilitation. Altogether this amounts to a demand for 20,588 positions for treatment per annum. In Austria, the expenditures for inpatient phase II rehabilitation of a patient given an average duration of stay of 28 days, are [symbol: see text] 4,774.-. Presuming 100% compliance, the institutional based outpatient phase II rehabilitation program costs [symbol: see text] 2,760.- per patient. The costs for institutional based phase III rehabilitation services are [symbol: see text] 2,990.- per patient. This number is accompanied by a potential effective reduction of risks for the patients and a potential effective reduction of costs for the carrier as the number of rehospitalizations and recurrent procedures would decrease significantly. At present, the supply of cardiac rehabilitation in Austria is sufficient for inpatient phase II, but insufficient for the institutional based outpatient phase II and mainly phase III. Thus, a striking asymmetry exists between supply and demand. In view of the enduring effects of institutional based phase III rehabilitation, the individual and social use and finally the expected efficiency in terms of costs, this program should at least be offered without limits to all eligible patients.