ABSTRACT
Importance: The assessment and management of surgical margins in stage I and II oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most important perioperative aspects of oncologic care, with profound implications for patient outcomes and adjuvant therapy. Understanding and critically reviewing the existing data surrounding margins in this context is necessary to rigorously care for this challenging group of patients and minimize patient morbidity and mortality. Observations: This review discusses the data related to the definitions related to surgical margins, methods for assessment, specimen vs tumor bed margin evaluation, and re-resection of positive margins. The observations presented emphasize notable controversy within the field about margin assessment, with early data coalescing around several key aspects of management, although studies are limited by their design. Conclusions and Relevance: Stage I and II oral cavity cancer requires surgical resection with negative margins to obtain optimal oncologic outcomes, but controversy persists over margin assessment. Future studies with improved, well-controlled study designs are required to more definitively guide margin assessment and management.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Humans , United States , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Margins of Excision , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) experience unique physical and psychosocial challenges that impact their health and quality of life. Early implementation of palliative care has been shown to improve various health care outcomes. Objective The aim of the present study was to evaluate the patterns of referral of patients with HNC to outpatient palliative care as they relate to utilization of resources and end-of-life discussions. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 245 patients with HNC referred to outpatient palliative care services at two Louisiana tertiary care centers from June 1, 2014, to October 1, 2019. The control group consisted of those that were referred but did not follow-up. Reasons for referral were obtained, and outcome measures such as emergency department (ED) visits, hospital readmissions, and advance care planning (ACP) documentation were assessed according to predictive variables. Results There were 177 patients in the treatment group and 68 in the control group. Patients were more likely to follow up to outpatient palliative care services if referred for pain management. Hospital system, prior inpatient palliative care, and number of outpatient visits were associated with an increased likelihood for ED visits and hospital readmissions. Those in the palliative care treatment group were also more likely to have ACP discussions. Conclusion Early implementation of outpatient palliative care among patients with HNC can initiate ACP discussions. However, there are discrepancies in referral reasons to palliative care and continued existing barriers to its effective utilization.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) experience unique physical and psychosocial challenges that impact their health and quality of life. Early implementation of palliative care has been shown to improve various health care outcomes. Objective The aim of the present study was to evaluate the patterns of referral of patients with HNC to outpatient palliative care as they relate to utilization of resources and end-of-life discussions. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 245 patients with HNC referred to outpatient palliative care services at two Louisiana tertiary care centers from June 1, 2014, to October 1, 2019. The control group consisted of those that were referred but did not follow-up. Reasons for referral were obtained, and outcome measures such as emergency department (ED) visits, hospital readmissions, and advance care planning (ACP) documentation were assessed according to predictive variables. Results There were 177 patients in the treatment group and 68 in the control group. Patients were more likely to follow up to outpatient palliative care services if referred for pain management. Hospital system, prior inpatient palliative care, and number of outpatient visits were associated with an increased likelihood for ED visits and hospital readmissions. Those in the palliative care treatment group were also more likely to have ACP discussions. Conclusion Early implementation of outpatient palliative care among patients with HNC can initiate ACP discussions. However, there are discrepancies in referral reasons to palliative care and continued existing barriers to its effective utilization.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Total laryngectomy (TL) with thyroidectomy can pose significant risks to parathyroid function, and variance in rates of post-operative hypocalcemia (POH) based on extent of thyroidectomy have not been previously reported. Our objective is to identify the rates of hypocalcemia and hypoparathyroidism in TL+/-thyroidectomy and compare this to matched thyroidectomy alone cohorts. METHODS: Multi-institutional retrospective chart review of patients treated surgically for laryngeal cancer with TL or benign/malignant thyroid disease with thyroidectomy at regional tertiary care centers in New Orleans and Baton Rouge, Louisiana from 2016 to 2019. Cases were evaluated for post-operative and post-discharge calcium and parathyroid hormone levels, post-operative and long-term calcium supplementation, and intraoperative parathyroid identification and management. RESULTS: 101 TL and 319 thyroidectomy patients' charts were reviewed. Regression analysis revealed increased odds of hypocalcemia and hypoparathyroidism in TL + TT versus TT alone (OR 10.7, OR 16.5, p < 0.001, respectively). TL + HT versus HT alone had increased odds of hypoparathyroidism (OR 1.6, p < 0.001). TL with any thyroidectomy compared to TL alone demonstrated both increased odds of hypocalcemia and hypoparathyroidism (OR 4.4 p = 0.009, and OR 4.5 p = 0.05). Odds of requiring long-term calcium supplementation were significantly increased with the addition of thyroidectomy across all groups. TL + TT was 8 times as likely (p = 0.002) and TL + HT was 5.3 times as likely (p = 0.001) to require long-term calcium supplementation compared to TL alone. CONCLUSIONS: Thyroidectomy combined with TL demonstrates marked increased risk of parathyroid dysfunction and resultant POH. Despite improved visualization of soft tissue anatomy with TL, risk of parathyroid injury in these settings requires special attention to extent of parathyroid dissection and potential devascularization to reduce long-term sequelae of hyperparathyroidism. Therefore, post-operative calcium monitoring after TL is necessary and should resemble the long-standing stringent protocols that already exist for monitoring in thyroidectomy populations.
Subject(s)
Hypocalcemia , Aftercare , Calcium , Humans , Hypocalcemia/epidemiology , Hypocalcemia/etiology , Laryngectomy/adverse effects , Parathyroid Hormone , Patient Discharge , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Thyroidectomy/adverse effects , Thyroidectomy/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy agents are used to treat advanced head and neck lesions. We aim to elucidate relationship between immunotherapy and surgical wound complications. METHODS: Retrospective multi-institutional case series evaluating patients undergoing ablative and flap reconstructive surgery and immunotherapy treatment. MAIN OUTCOME: wound complications. RESULTS: Eight-two (62%) patients received preoperative therapy, 89 (67%) postoperative, and 33 (25%) in both settings. Forty-one (31%) patients had recipient site complications, 12 (9%) had donor site. Nineteen (14%) had major recipient site complications, 22 (17%) had minor. There was no statistically significant difference in complications based on patient or tumor-specific variables. Preoperative therapy alone demonstrated increased major complications (odds ratio [OR] 3.7, p = 0.04), and trend to more donor site complications (OR 7.4, p = 0.06), however treatment in both preoperative and postoperative therapy was not. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative immunotherapy may be associated with increased wound complications. Controlled studies are necessary to delineate this association and potential risks of therapy.
Subject(s)
Free Tissue Flaps , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: When gastric pull-up is unsuccessful or unsuitable for total esophageal reconstruction, a supercharged pedicled jejunum can be used to reestablish gastrointestinal continuity. The authors reviewed their technique and outcomes of the supercharged pedicled jejunum for total esophageal reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed of 100 patients who underwent supercharged pedicled jejunum for total esophageal reconstruction between 2000 and 2017 at the Texas Medical Center. Patient characteristics, technical details, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 59.5 ± 11.4 years. Forty-two patients (42 percent) had surgical complications (18 percent at the recipient site, 13 percent at the donor site, and 11 percent at both). Medical complications occurred in 28 patients (28 percent). A major surgical complication occurred in 20 patients (20 percent). The average length of stay was 15 days (range, 6 to 152 days). At last follow-up, 20 patients (20 percent) had metastatic disease and six (6 percent) had local recurrence. Fifty-four patients (54 percent) died during the follow-up period. Of 79 patients with follow-up longer than 6 months, 68 (86 percent) tolerated a solid or soft oral diet, with a 16 percent tube feed-dependence rate. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 78.8, 53.7, and 33.1 percent, respectively. The median survival time was 38.7 months. CONCLUSIONS: The authors present their experience with 100 supercharged pedicled jejunums for total esophageal reconstruction. Functional outcomes are comparable to, or better than, other salvage modalities. With careful multidisciplinary planning and meticulous, well-orchestrated surgical technique, swallowing function can be restored to provide quality of life in patients with few remaining surgical options.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophagectomy/methods , Jejunum/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Surgical Flaps , Aged , Databases, Factual , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Plastic Surgery Procedures/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Isolated lingual and lower face Raynaud phenomenon without primary Raynaud of the digits is a very rare condition associated with chemoradiation therapy (RT) in previous reports. The condition, which more commonly presents in patients with a history of Raynaud disease, is often self-limiting, but vasodilating agents and steroids have been suggested as possible treatment options. Spasmodic torticollis is a different, more common entity, also associated with history of RT or previous head and neck surgery. We present a rare case of a patient who developed Raynaud phenomenon of the lower face and tongue in the presence of spasmodic torticollis after mandibulectomy and free fibula reconstruction followed by RT to the oral cavity and neck. Possible causes, pathophysiologic mechanisms and treatment options are discussed. This is the first report of botulinum toxin treatment of isolated secondary Raynaud phenomenon of the lower face and tongue.
Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins/administration & dosage , Mandibular Neoplasms/surgery , Mandibular Osteotomy/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Raynaud Disease/drug therapy , Torticollis/drug therapy , Bone Transplantation/adverse effects , Bone Transplantation/methods , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Fibula/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mandibular Neoplasms/pathology , Mandibular Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Mandibular Osteotomy/methods , Middle Aged , Neck Dissection/adverse effects , Neck Dissection/methods , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Raynaud Disease/etiology , Raynaud Disease/physiopathology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Risk Assessment , Torticollis/etiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment and prognostic factors affecting long-term survival in patients with sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) have yet to be clearly defined. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with curative intent from 1980-2015 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients met inclusion criteria, including 8 who were treated with radiotherapy alone. Median follow-up time was 55 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 67.0% and 49.0%, respectively. The 10-year OS and DFS rates were 44.8% and 25.4%, respectively. Factors that portended for poor survival on multivariate analysis were recurrent disease, any solid type histology, epicenter in the sinus cavity, the presence of facial symptoms, or the original disease not treated with surgery. There was no association between surgical margin status or nodal status and survival. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients with sinonasal ACC with extended follow-up, long-term survival is better than reported in prior literature. Future research should target patients with adverse risk factors.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/mortality , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/pathology , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/pathology , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/surgery , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/therapy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the cost differences between preoperative and postoperative placement of gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) in patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with aerodigestive tract cancers from 2010 to 2015. Data included inpatient and postdischarge costs, demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical treatment, length of stay (LOS), time spent in the intensive care unit (ICU), and readmissions. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety patients were included in this study. There was a $7624 inpatient cost savings (P = .002) for those G-tubes placed preoperatively ($26 060) versus postoperatively ($33 754). Postdischarge costs did not differ significantly between groups (P = .60). There was a $9248 total costs savings (P = .009) for those patients with G-tubes placed preoperatively ($39 751) versus postoperatively ($48 999), despite patients with preoperative G-tubes having lower body mass index (BMI; P = .009), higher Association of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class (P = .02), more preoperative radiation (P < .001), and more free tissue transfer reconstruction (P = .007). CONCLUSION: There is potential for savings by placing G-tubes preoperatively, possibly driven by decreased LOS, despite data suggesting that patients with G-tubes placed preoperatively are higher risk.
Subject(s)
Cost Savings , Enteral Nutrition/economics , Gastrostomy/economics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Health Care Costs , Aged , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Gastrostomy/methods , Head and Neck Neoplasms/economics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission/economics , Postoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Compare outcomes of patients with olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) without skull base involvement treated with and without resection of the dura and olfactory bulb. METHODS: Retrospective review of ONB patients treated from 1992 to 2013 at the MD Anderson Cancer Center (The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.). Primary outcomes were overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were identified. Most patients had Kadish A/B. tumors (97%), Hyams grade 2 (70%), with unilateral involvement (91%), and arising from the nasal cavity (68%). Tumor involved the mucosa abutting the skull base in 42% of patients. Twenty-five patients (71%) received surgery and radiation, whereas the remainder had surgery alone. Five patients (14%) had bony skull base resection, and eight patients (23%) had resection of bony skull base, dura, and olfactory bulb. Surgical margins were grossly positive in one patient (3%) and microscopically positive in four patients (12%). The 5- and 10-year overall survival were 93% and 81%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) were 89% and 78%, respectively. Bony cribriform plate resection was associated with better DFS (P = 0.05), but dura and olfactory bulb resection was not (P = 0.11). There was a trend toward improved DFS in patients with negative resection margins (P = 0.19). Surgical modality (open vs. endoscopic) and postoperative radiotherapy did not impact DFS. CONCLUSION: Most Kadish A/B ONB tumors have low Hyams grade, unilateral involvement, and favorable survival outcomes. Resection of the dura and olfactory bulb is not oncologically advantageous in patients without skull base involvement who are surgically treated with negative resection margins and cribriform resection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:1274-1280, 2018.
Subject(s)
Dura Mater/surgery , Esthesioneuroblastoma, Olfactory/surgery , Nasal Cavity/surgery , Nose Neoplasms/surgery , Olfactory Bulb/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Esthesioneuroblastoma, Olfactory/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nose Neoplasms/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Skull Base , Survival Analysis , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification along free flap pedicles has been reported. Reports suggest that subperiosteal dissection of the pedicle from the bone during the harvest of the fibula free flap may predispose the pedicle to heterotopic ossification. METHODS: A 56-year-old man with history of a T2N1M0 squamous cell cancer of the left tonsil who was treated with chemoradiation developed osteoradionecrosis of the mandible requiring fibula free flap reconstruction. The patient presented with a firm submandibular mass 1 year after reconstruction. RESULTS: Imaging revealed bone along the mandible projecting to the floor of the mouth. Surgery revealed heterotopic bone along the submandibular triangle and vascular pedicle. The bone was removed and the periosteum fulgurated to prevent further proliferation. CONCLUSION: Our practice includes a high-volume head and neck extirpative and reconstruction practice. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first documented case of heterotopic ossification along a free flap pedicle despite routine subperiosteal elevation to free the peroneal artery from the proximal fibula.
Subject(s)
Fibula/transplantation , Free Tissue Flaps/adverse effects , Mandible/surgery , Ossification, Heterotopic/etiology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Bone Transplantation/adverse effects , Fibula/pathology , Humans , Male , Mandible/pathology , Middle Aged , Ossification, Heterotopic/surgery , Osteoradionecrosis/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Perineural invasion and distant metastasis lead to a poor prognosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma and there is no effective therapy available. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate target gene expression, which can be biomarkers or therapeutic targets for certain cancer types. We aimed to identify miRNAs and their target genes possibly involved in metastasis of salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (SACC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using Nanostring nCounter analysis, we examined miRNA expression in two SACC cell lines: SACC-83 and SACC-LM, with low and high lung metastasis rates, respectively. We then verified the differentially expressed miRNAs with real-time polymerase chain reaction in the cell lines and in tumor samples from patients with SACC. miRNA target-gene expression was also analyzed. RESULTS: SACC-83 showed higher gene expression of miR-130a, miR-342, and miR-205; SACC-LM showed higher gene expression of miR-99a and miR-155. In human tissue, miR-205 was highly expressed in the primary SACC, while miR-155 and miR-342 were highly expressed in recurrent SACC. Six predicted target genes of miRNA-155 and miR-99a linked to tumorigenesis were further analyzed and RNA expression of ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 2 (UBA2) was higher in SACC than normal salivary gland tissue, and higher in primary compared to recurrent SACC (p<0.05). RNA expression of retinoic acid receptors (RARS) was higher in tissue from primary than recurrent SACC and normal salivary gland (p<0.05), but that in recurrent SACC was not significantly higher than normal salivary gland tissue. RNA expression of minichromosome maintenance 8 homologous recombination repair factor (MCM8) and 24-dehydrocholesterol reductase (DHCR24) was higher in primary SACC than normal salivary gland tissue (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: miR-99a, miR-155, miR-130a, miR-342, and miR-205 may play a role in metastasis of SACC. MiR-155 may be involved in SACC metastasis through UBA2 pathways, and UBA2 may function as a biomarker/mediator of SACC metastasis.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/genetics , MicroRNAs/genetics , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Carcinogenesis/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Gene Expression/genetics , Humans , Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins/genetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , Oxidoreductases Acting on CH-CH Group Donors/genetics , Receptors, Retinoic Acid/genetics , Salivary Glands/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Explore relationship between insurance status and survival, determine outcomes that vary based on insurance status, and identify potential areas of intervention. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent resection of an upper aerodigestive tract malignancy at a single tertiary care hospital during a 5-year period. METHODS: Patients were categorized into four groups by insurance status: Medicaid or uninsured, Medicare and under 65 years of age, Medicare and 65 years or older, and private insurance. Data were collected from the medical record and analyzed with respect to survival and other outcomes. RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 860 patients. Survival analysis demonstrated a hazard ratio of 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.0) for the Medicaid/uninsured group when compared to the private insurance group. When adjusted for other variables, mortality was still different across insurance groups (P = 0.002). The following also were different across insurance groups: tumor stage (P < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P < 0.001), length of stay (P < 0.001), and complications (P = 0.021). The Medicaid/uninsured group was most likely to have a complication (odds ratio [OR] = 2.10, 95% CI 1.24-3.56, P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Medicaid/uninsured patients present with more advanced tumors and have poorer survival than privately insured patients. Insurance status is predictive of tumor stage, comorbidity burden, length of stay, and complications. Specifically, the Medicaid/uninsured group had high rates of tobacco use and alcohol abuse, advanced stage tumors, and postoperative complications. Because alcohol abuse and advanced stage also were predictors of poor survival, they may contribute to the survival disparity for socially disadvantaged patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 127:2784-2789, 2017.
Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Insurance Coverage , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Medicaid , Medicare , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , United StatesABSTRACT
AIM: To characterize the chemokine pattern in metastatic salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (SACC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to compare chemokine and chemokine receptor gene expression in two SACC cell lines: SACC-83 and SACC-LM (lung metastasis). Chemokines and receptor genes were then screened and their expression pattern characterized in human tissue samples of non-recurrent SACC and recurrent SACC with perineural invasion. RESULTS: Expression of chemokine receptors C5AR1, CCR1, CCR3, CCR6, CCR7, CCR9, CCR10, CXCR4, CXCR6, CXCR7, CCRL1 and CCRL2 were higher in SACC-83 compared to SACC-LM. CCRL1, CCBP2, CMKLR1, XCR1 and CXCR2 and 6 chemokine genes (CCL13, CCL27, CXCL14, CMTM1, CMTM2, CKLF) were more highly expressed in tissues of patients without tumor recurrence/perineural invasion compared to those with tumor recurrence. CCRL1 (receptor), CCL27, CMTM1, CMTM2, and CKLF (chemokine) genes were more highly expressed in SACC-83 and human tissues of patients without tumor recurrence/perineural invasion. CONCLUSION: CCRL1, CCL27, CMTM1, CMTM2 and CKLF may play important roles in the development of tumor metastases in SACC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/genetics , Chemokines/biosynthesis , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Receptors, Chemokine/biosynthesis , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/genetics , Aged , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Chemokines/genetics , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Neoplasm Invasiveness/genetics , Neoplasm Metastasis , Receptors, Chemokine/genetics , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
AIM: To identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between perineural invasion-positive (PP) and -negative (PN) cutaneous squamous cell cancers (CSCC). MATERIALS/METHODS: Forty CSCC samples with and without perineural invasion were processed for RNA isolation and hybridization to Affymetrix-U219 DNA microarrays. Raw gene expression data were normalized by Robust Multi-array Averaging (RMA) and log2 transformed. Gene expression-based classification models were created and accuracies evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. RESULTS: At a stringent limma p-value (p<0.001), 24 genes were differentially expressed between PP and PN samples. The cross-validated performance of the eight classification models exhibited a mean accuracy of 85-95%. Diagonal linear discriminant was most accurate at 95%, followed by Bayesian compound covariate at 94%. The poorest accuracy (85%) was observed for 1-Nearest neighbor and Support vector machines. CONCLUSION: Gene expression may distinguish between PP and PN CSCC. Understanding these gene patterns may potentiate more timely diagnosis of perineural invasion and guide comprehensive therapies.
Subject(s)
Neoplasm Proteins/biosynthesis , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell/genetics , Nerve Sheath Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Bayes Theorem , Biomarkers, Tumor/biosynthesis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Epithelial Cells/pathology , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Neoplasm Invasiveness/genetics , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell/complications , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell/pathology , Nerve Sheath Neoplasms/complications , Nerve Sheath Neoplasms/pathology , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Skin Neoplasms/complications , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Support Vector MachineABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Investigate the relationship of G-tube placement timing on post-operative outcomes. PARTICIPANTS: 908 patients underwent resection of head and neck upper aerodigestive tract tumors between 2007 and 2013. Patient charts were retrospectively screened for patient demographics, pre-operative nutrition variables, co-morbid conditions, Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging, surgical treatment type, and timing of G-tube placement. Exclusionary criteria included death within the first three months of the resection and resections performed solely for nodal disease. MAIN OUTCOMES: Post-surgical outcomes, including wound and medical complications, hospital re-admissions, length of inpatient hospital stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) time. RESULTS: 793 surgeries were included: 8% of patients had G-tubes pre-operatively and 25% had G-tubes placed post-operatively. Patients with G-tubes (pre-operative or post-operative) were more likely to have complications and prolonged hospital care as compared to those without G-tubes (p < 0.001). Patients with pre-operative G-tubes had shortened length of stay (p = 0.007), less weight loss (p = 0.03), and fewer wound care needs (p < 0.0001), when compared to those that received G-tubes post-operatively. Those with G-tubes placed post-operatively had worse outcomes in all categories, except pre-operative BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Though having enteral access in the form of a G-tube at any point suggests a more high risk patient, having a G-tube placed in the pre-operative period may protect against poor post-operative outcomes. Post-operative outcomes can be predicted based on patient characteristics available to the physician in the pre-operative period.
Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Gastrostomy/instrumentation , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/adverse effects , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Identifying high-risk patients in the preoperative period can allow physicians to optimize nutritional status early for better outcomes after head and neck cancer resections. OBJECTIVE: To develop a model to predict preoperatively the need for gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement in patients undergoing surgery of the upper aerodigestive tract. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective medical record review included all adult patients diagnosed with head and neck cancers who underwent tumor resection from 2007 through 2012 at Wake Forest Baptist Health, a level 1 tertiary care center. Records were screened for patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical treatment type, and postoperative placement of G-tube. A total of 743 patients underwent resection of head and neck tumors. Of these, 203 were excluded for prior G-tube placement, prior head and neck resection, G-tube placement for chemoradiotherapy, and resection for solely nodal disease, leaving 540 patients for analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Placement of postoperative G-tube. RESULTS: Of the 540 included patients, 23% required G-tube placement. The following variables were significant and independent predictors of G-tube placement: preoperative irradiation (odds ratio [OR], 4.1; 95% CI, 2.4-6.9; P < .001), supracricoid laryngectomy (OR, 26.0; 95% CI, 4.9-142.9; P < .001), tracheostomy tube placement (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.4; P < .001), clinical node stage N0 vs N2 (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.2; P = .01), clinical node stage N1 vs N2 (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.8-3.3; P = .01), preoperative weight loss (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.2; P = .004), dysphagia (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.2; P = .005), reconstruction type (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9; P = .02), and tumor stage (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.9; P = .03). A predictive model was developed based on these variables. In the validation analysis, we found that the average predicted score for patients who received G-tubes was statistically different than the score for the patients who did not receive G-tubes (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We present a validated and comprehensive model for preoperatively predicting the need for G-tube placement in patients undergoing surgery of the upper aerodigestive tract. Early enteral access in high-risk patients may prevent complications in postoperative healing and improve overall outcomes, including quality of life.
Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition , Gastrostomy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Needs Assessment , Adult , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 10-year outcome of patients presenting with asymptomatic moderate carotid artery stenosis, and to determine which factors correlate with progression of disease to stroke or revascularization. METHODS: A retrospective review of all new patients presenting with asymptomatic moderate carotid artery stenosis from July 1998 to December 2001 was undertaken. Patients were consecutively identified and included by using duplex ultrasonography to identify moderate carotid disease. Variables were recorded for all patient encounters through June 2010. The primary end point was occurrence of ipsilateral cerebrovascular stroke or revascularization event (SORE). Statin therapy and angiotensin blockade (STAB) were categorized as follows: STAB(0)-medical treatment with neither statin therapy nor angiotensin blockade, STAB(1)-treatment with only one of the two, STAB(2)-treatment with both. An amortized cost model analyzed the cost of SORE-free survival. RESULTS: Over a 42-month period, 468 carotids in 366 patients with an average age of 69.0 ± 8.7 years were evaluated. Over a mean follow-up of 6.6 ± 2.7 years, SORE occurred in 150 (32.1%) carotid arteries. Hyperlipidemia was predictive of SORE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.543, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.053-2.262, P = 0.03). Medical therapies protective against SORE were beta-blockade (HR: 0.612, 95% CI: 0.435-0.861, P < 0.05), STAB(1) (HR: 0.487, 95% CI: 0.336-0.706, P < 0.01), and STAB(2) (HR: 0.149, 95% CI: 0.089-0.248, P < 0.01). At 10 years, SORE-free survival in STAB(2) was 82.7% ± 4.6%, STAB(1) was 56.3% ± 5.0%, and STAB(0) was 29.3% ± 5.4% (P < 0.01). The cost per SORE-free year in STAB(2) was $1,695.40 ± $275.60, STAB(1) was $3,916.80 ± $605.44, and STAB(0) was $4,126.40 ± $427.23 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the clinical and financial advantage of using both statin therapy and angiotensin pathway blockage in patients with asymptomatic moderate carotid artery stenosis.
Subject(s)
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Carotid Stenosis/drug therapy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aged , Angioplasty , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/adverse effects , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/economics , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/economics , Asymptomatic Diseases , Carotid Stenosis/complications , Carotid Stenosis/diagnosis , Carotid Stenosis/economics , Carotid Stenosis/mortality , Carotid Stenosis/surgery , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Costs , Drug Therapy, Combination , Endarterectomy, Carotid , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/economics , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , North Carolina , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler, DuplexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) should not cost more or less than traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: Retrospective cost data were collected from the accounting records of a single institution. A direct comparison of LC and SILC was conducted. Data on the SILC cases converted to LC were included. The total operating room (OR) cost (actual cost to the hospital for equipment, time, and personnel) and the total OR charges (total derived from the OR cost plus a margin to cover overhead costs beyond material costs) were examined. The total hospital charges (OR charges plus hospital charges accrued in the perioperative period) also were included. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, with p values less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Over a period of 19 months, 116 cases of minimally invasive cholecystectomy were evaluated. Of the 116 patients, 48 underwent LC during the first half of that period, and 68 patients underwent SILC during the second half of that period. Nine of the single-incision procedures were converted to traditional LC, for a 13% conversion rate. The groups were well matched from a demographics standpoint, with no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diagnoses, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, or payment. Comparison of all attempted SILCs, including those converted, with all LCs showed no significant difference in cost category totals. A significant difference among all cost variables was found when SILCs were compared with SILCs that required conversion to LC. A significant difference among the cost variables also was found when LCs were compared with converted SILCs. CONCLUSION: The cost for SILC did not differ significantly from that for LC when standard materials were used and the duration of the procedure was considered. Converted cases were significantly more expensive than completed SILC and LC cases.