Application of a new ultrasound criterion for the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome.

Objective: To define which ultrasound criteria could replace the classic Rotterdam criteria as the best indicator of the risk of developing endocrine-metabolic changes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Materials and methods: This multicenter cross-sectional study included 200 women with PCOS and one control group of 111 women without PCOS. The primary outcomes to be considered were follicular count, hirsutism, total testosterone levels, free androgen index (FAI), and insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR), and the secondary outcome was the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level. Results: The main finding in this study points toward a different ultrasound criterion-23 or more follicles of any size in at least one ovary, which is postulated as an alternative to the classic criterion described in the Rotterdam consensus. This criterion correlates better with the other two PCOS criteria and also identifies women at increased risk of hirsutism (Ferriman-Gallwey score: 6.08 ± 3.54 vs. 4.44 ± 3.75, p < 0.0001), total testosterone levels (2.24 ± 0.298 vs. 1.42 ± 1.530, p = 0.0001), FAI (4.85 ± 0.83 vs. 2.12 ± 1.93, p < 0.001), and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR: 1.74 ± 0.182 vs. 1.504 ± 0.230, p = 0.001) more accurately. Regarding AMH, large differences in their mean values were observed between the groups (7.07 vs. 4.846 ng/ml, p = 0.000). However, these differences depended on age. Conclusion: The ovarian ultrasound examination with 23 or more follicles of any size in any of the ovaries constitutes a powerful tool to accurately diagnose PCOS and to associate it with metabolic-endocrine processes such as hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance.

Validity of two-dimensional ultrasound for determining extreme foetal weights to term.

The aim of this study was to assess the validity of ultrasound carried out within seven days prior to birth at term for the calculation of full term estimated foetal weight (EFW) in order to diagnose extreme foetal weight, performed using a single-center retrospective cohort study of 2500 pregnant women. Ultrasound calculations of EFW with a standard error of less than 10% showed an accuracy ratio of 75.1% for the total sample. This percentage was similar for appropriate for gestational age (78.6%) and normal foetal weights (77.5%) but decreased significantly (p < .01) in the case of extreme foetal weights. The simple error increased in both the high and low EFWs, taking on positive values for the low weights and negative values for the high weights. As for the percentage error values, there was a tendency for positive errors for low weights and negative errors for high weights; this led to a tendency to overestimate low foetal weights and underestimate high foetal weights.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Two-dimensional ultrasound is currently the principal tool used in obstetrics to evaluate foetal growth, mainly through the calculation of EFW. Foetal weight represents an important prognostic factor in perinatal results, with a greater risk of adverse effects in cases of extreme foetal weights. In this sense, there are few studies that assess the validity of EFW calculations focussing on extreme foetal weights to term.What do the results of this study add? The ultrasound estimates of EFW with an error lower than 10% in the seven days prior to birth showed an accuracy ratio of 75.1% for the total sample. This percentage was similar to appropriate for gestational age weights (78.6%) and of normal weights (77.5%), but decreased significantly (p < .01) in the case of extreme foetal weights: small for gestational age (52.1%), large for gestational age (68.2%), microsomia (49.1%), and macrosomia (61%). Likewise, we found high specificity and low sensitivity for ultrasound diagnosis of extreme foetal weights.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or future research? The validity of ultrasound EFW is influenced by extreme foetal weights, with a tendency to overestimate low weights and underestimate high weights, which represents a clinically important finding.

Observer Influence with Other Variables on the Accuracy of Ultrasound Estimation of Fetal Weight at Term.

Background and Objectives: The accuracy with which the estimation of fetal weight (EFW) at term is determined is useful in order to address obstetric complications, since it is a parameter that represents an important prognostic factor for perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the role of the experienced observers with other variables that could influence the accuracy of the ultrasound used to calculate EFW at term, carried out within a period of seven days prior to delivery, in order to assess interobserver variability. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed including 1144 pregnancies at term. The validity of the ultrasound used to calculate EFW at term was analyzed using simple error, absolute error, percentage error and absolute percentage error, as well as the percentage of predictions with an error less than 10 and 15% in relation to maternal, obstetric and ultrasound variables. Results: Valid predictions with an error less than 10 and 15% were 74.7 and 89.7% respectively, with such precision decreasing according to the observer as well as in extreme fetal weights. The remaining variables were not significant in ultrasound EFW at term. The simple error, absolute error, percentage error and absolute percentage error were greater in cases of extreme fetal weights, with a tendency to overestimate the low weights and underestimate the high weights. Conclusions: The accuracy of EFW with ultrasound carried out within seven days prior to birth is not affected by maternal or obstetric variables, or by the time interval between the ultrasound and delivery. However, accuracy was reduced by the observers and in extreme fetal weights.