Carotid webs in large vessel occlusion stroke: Clinical, radiological and thrombus histopathological findings.

BACKGROUND: Carotid webs are an under-recognized embolic source in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Limited resources currently exist to assist clinicians in stroke prevention for patients with symptomatic carotid webs (SCW). We aimed at analysing the clinical, radiological and procedural features of stroke patients with SCW undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), and to describe the histopathological composition of their occlusive thrombi. METHODS: In a single-center observational study on consecutive patients with ischemic stroke treated by EVT, carotid web was defined symptomatic when it was ipsilateral to the ischemic lesion in a patient classified with stroke of otherwise undetermined etiology. Clinical, radiological and procedural data of patients with SCW were evaluated. Histopathological examination of the retrieved thrombi was performed. RESULTS: Out of 1430 patients with large vessel occlusion stroke treated by EVT, 11(0.7%) were found to have a SCW. Patients with SCW had a median age of 47 years old (IQR 38-50), they were prevalently women (55%), mostly of African ethnicity (91%). Each of the 11 patients achieved successful angiographic reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) after EVT. For secondary prevention, elective endovascular carotid stenting was performed in 5 (55%) patients, while 1 (9%) was treated by surgical endoarterectomy. Histological analysis of the retrieved thrombi performed in 4 patients showed a mixed composition with variable red blood cell content. CONCLUSIONS: EVT is feasible in large vessel occlusion stroke related to SCW. Procedures of carotid revascularization appear to be feasible therapeutic options for secondary prevention. The histopathological analysis of cerebral thrombi may provide new insights on stroke pathogenesis in patients with SCW.

Susceptibility Vessel Sign in the ASTER Trial: Higher Recanalization Rate and More Favourable Clinical Outcome after First Line Stent Retriever Compared to Contact Aspiration.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the Aspiration vs. Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization (ASTER) trial, which evaluated contact aspiration (CA) versus stent retriever (SR) use as first-line technique, the impact of the susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was studied to determine its influence on trial results. METHODS: We included patients having undergone CA or SR for M1 or M2 occlusions, who were screened by MRI with T2* gradient recalled echo. Occlusions were classified as SVS (+) or SVS (-) in each randomization arm. Modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) 2b, 2c, or 3 revascularization rates were recorded and clinical outcomes assessed by the overall distribution of modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. RESULTS: Among the 202 patients included, 143 patients were SVS (+) (70.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64.5% to 77.1%). Overall, there was no difference in angiographic and clinical outcomes according to SVS status. However, compared to SR, CA achieved a lower mTICI 2c/3 rate in SVS (+) patients (risk ratio [RR] for CA vs. SR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.71) but not in SVS (-) (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.77; P for interaction=0.018). A significant heterogeneity in favor of superiority of first-line SR strategy in SVS (+) patients was also found regarding the overall mRS distribution (common odds ratio for CA vs. SR, 0.40 vs. 1.32; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.74 in SVS (+) vs. 95% CI, 0.51 to 3.35 in SVS (-); P for interaction=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: As a first line strategy, SR achieved higher recanalization rates and a more favourable clinical outcome at 3 months compared to CA when MRI shows SVS within the thrombus.

Stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis in internal carotid artery dissection with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion independently predicts poor outcome after intravenous thrombolysis. Recanalization of internal carotid artery dissection by stent-assisted angioplasty has recently been proposed when anticoagulation fails to prevent a new ischemic event. We recently reported a case of tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion with dissection of the internal carotid artery successfully treated with endovascular stent-assisted thrombolysis. METHODS: We compared clinical outcomes in consecutive patients presenting with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion with internal carotid artery dissection within 3 hours of symptom onset who were eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, treated by either endovascular stent-assisted thrombolysis or intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA) when an endovascular therapist was unavailable. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were obtained at baseline and after 24 hours. The modified Rankin Scale score was used to assess outcomes at 3 months. Arterial recanalization was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Of 10 patients screened, 6 were treated with endovascular therapy and 4 with intravenous rtPA. Before treatment, mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were high and comparable in the 2 groups (17 and 16, respectively). In the endovascular group, all patients achieved middle cerebral artery recanalization with subsequent dramatic improvement versus only 1 patient with middle cerebral artery recanalization in the intravenous rtPA group. At 3 months, 4 patients in the endovascular group had a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score=0). In the intravenous rtPA group, 3 patients had a poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score> or =3). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular stent-assisted thrombolysis is a promising treatment in tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion due to internal carotid artery dissection and compares favorably with intravenous rtPA.