Femoral neck shortening as a sequela of internal fixation for femoral neck fractures and its effect on the coronal alignment of the limb: a pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck shortening is a common phenomenon following osteosynthesis for femoral neck fractures, which was shown to have a negative effect on hip function. There is paucity of literature on the effect of shortening on the ipsilateral limb mechanical axis and knee coronal alignment. We hypothesized that postoperative femoral neck shortening can alter the limb's mechanical axis into valgus. METHODS: Of 583 patients screened, 13 patients with severe neck shortening (< 10 mm) following femoral neck fracture fixation, were found eligible and agreed to participate. A full-length lower limb radiographs were obtained and radiographic parameters (offset, neck-shaft angle, HKA, mLPFA, mDLFA, mMPTFA, MAD, MAD-r) as well as functional scores were obtained. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in mechanical axis deviation ratio (MAD-r) were found between the ipsilateral and the contralateral extremities (0.41 ± 0.16 versus 0.55 ± 0.11, p = 0.03). A correlation between femoral neck length differences and MAD was not statistically significant although a tendency towards lateral deviation of the mechanical axis was noted (r = - 0.5, p = 0.077). A negative correlation was found between a greater difference in the femoral neck length and the SF12 score, both in the physical and the mental parts (r = - 0.69, p = 0.008; r = - 0.58, p = 0.035, respectively). CONCLUSION: We found a more lateralized mechanical axis in limbs that demonstrated post-operative ipsilateral femoral neck severe shortening. These findings may provide a possible explanation and rationale for knee pain and perhaps for the development of knee osteoarthritis as a sequalae of femoral neck shortening. Further investigation and larger cohort, long-term studies are needed to further explore this hypothesis.

Surgical treatment of septic arthritis of the hip in children: arthrotomy compared with repeated aspiration-lavage.

PURPOSE: To review two cohorts of children treated by two different protocols (repeated needle aspiration-lavage vs. arthrotomy) for surgical treatment of septic arthritis of the hip (SAH). METHODS: In order to compare between the two methods, the following parameters were checked: (a) Scar cosmesis was assessed by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). We considered satisfactory results (no scar discomfort) when POSAS was within 10% of the ideal score; (b) 24-h post-operative pain was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS); (c) Complication rates of incomplete drainage (re-arthrotomy/therapy modification from aspiration-lavage to arthrotomy). The results were evaluated by the Student t-test or by the chi-square test. RESULTS: Seventy-nine children (aged 2-14 years) admitted during 2009-2018 and available for at least two years of follow-up were enrolled. The POSAS score (range 12-120 points) at the latest follow-up was higher in the arthrotomy group compared with the aspiration-lavage group (18.10 ± 6.22 versus 12.27 ± 1.40, p < 0.001); 77.4% of patients treated by arthrotomy had no scar discomfort. The 24-h post-intervention VAS (range 1-10) was 5.06 ± 1.29 after arthrotomy and 4.03 ± 1.13 after aspiration-lavage, p < 0.04. Complications were three times more frequent in the aspiration-lavage group (8.8% in the arthrotomy group and 26.7% in the aspiration-lavage group, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the lower complication rate observed in the arthrotomy group outweighs by far scar cosmesis and post-operative pain advantages in the aspiration-lavage group. Arthrotomy as a drainage method is safer than aspiration-lavage.