A systematic review and meta-analysis of the i-gel(®) vs laryngeal mask airway in adults.

We systematically reviewed 31 adult randomised clinical trials of the i-gel(®) vs laryngeal mask airway. The mean (95% CI) leak pressure difference and relative risk (95% CI) of insertion on the first attempt were similar: 0.40 (-1.23 to 2.02) cmH2 O and 0.98 (0.95-1.01), respectively. The mean (95% CI) insertion time and the relative risk (95% CI) of sore throat were less with the i-gel: by 1.46 (0.33-2.60) s, p = 0.01, and 0.59 (0.38-0.90), p = 0.02, respectively. The relative risk of poor fibreoptic view through the i-gel was 0.29 (0.16-0.54), p < 0.0001. All outcomes displayed substantial heterogeneity, I(2)  ≥ 75%. Subgroup analyses did not decrease heterogeneity, but suggested that insertion of the i-gel was faster than for first-generation laryngeal mask airways and that the i-gel leak pressure was higher than first generation, but lower than second-generation, laryngeal mask airways. A less frequent sore throat was the main clinical advantage of the i-gel.

Median effective dose (ED50) of paracetamol and morphine for postoperative pain: a study of interaction.

BACKGROUND: Paracetamol is widely used to treat postoperative pain and is well known for its morphine-sparing effect. Therefore, the effect of morphine-paracetamol combination can be synergistic, additive, or infra-additive. The primary aim of our study is to define the median effective analgesic doses (ED50s) of paracetamol, morphine, and the combination of both. Also, the nature of the interaction for postoperative pain after moderately painful surgery using an up-and-down method and isobolographic analysis was determined. METHODS: Ninety patients, undergoing moderately painful surgery, were included in one of the three groups. Determination of the median ED50s was performed by the Dixon and Mood up-and-down method. Initial doses were 1.5 g and 5 mg, with dose adjustment intervals of 0.5 g and 1 mg, in the paracetamol and morphine groups, respectively. The initial doses of paracetamol and morphine were 1.5 g and 3 mg, in the paracetamol-morphine combination group with dose adjustment intervals of 0.25 g for paracetamol and 0.5 mg for morphine. Analgesic efficacy was defined as a reduction to or <3 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, 45 min after the beginning of drug administration. Isobolographic analysis was used to define the nature of their interaction. RESULTS: The median ED50s of paracetamol and morphine were 2.1 g and 5 mg, respectively. The median ED50 of the combination was 1.3 g for paracetamol and 2.7 mg for morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the combination of the paracetamol and morphine produces an additive analgesic effect. Clinical trial registration NCT01366313.

Minimal alveolar concentration of sevoflurane for maintaining bispectral index below 50 in morbidly obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity is associated with important differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The aim of this study was to determine minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane for maintaining bispectral index (BIS) below 50 (MACBIS50 ) in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery using the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) method. METHODS: Twenty-four morbidly obese patients (body mass index 40-70 kg/m(2) ) were enrolled in our study. Twenty minutes following pre-medication with fentanyl 100 µg, general anaesthesia was induced using propofol 2 mg/kg and cisatracurium 2 mg/kg to facilitate tracheal intubation. The lowest BIS score was recorded following induction. Thereafter, when BIS began to increase > 60, maintenance of anaesthesia was started with a pre-determined end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (ET Sevo) and maintained for 10 min followed by 1-min assessment of BIS taken at 10-s intervals to determine the ET Sevo. The ET Sevo leading to a probability close to 80% success was calculated using the CRM, and the MACBIS50 leading to 50% success was calculated by fitting the data to a dose-probability sigmoid curve, respectively. RESULTS: The ET Sevo able to maintain BIS value below 50 was 1.8% in 67% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.86] and higher in the remaining 33% of the patients and the ET Sevo leading to a BIS value below 50 in 50% of the patients (MACBIS50 ) was 1.6 ± 0.10%. CONCLUSIONS: The calculated values (1.8% and 1.6%) were higher than that previously reported in normal adult patients (0.97%; 95% CI 0.89-1.1%) and less than that reported in children (2.8%; 95% CI 2.7-3.1%).

Postoperative intravenous morphine titration.

Relief of acute pain during the immediate postoperative period is an important task for anaesthetists. Morphine is widely used to control moderate-to-severe postoperative pain and the use of small i.v. boluses of morphine in the post-anaesthesia care unit allows a rapid titration of the dose needed for adequate pain relief. The essential principle of a titration regimen must be to adapt the morphine dose to the pain level. Although morphine would not appear to be the most appropriate choice for achieving rapid pain relief, this is the sole opioid assessed in many studies of immediate postoperative pain management using titration. More than 90% of the patients have pain relief using a protocol of morphine titration and the mean dose required to obtain pain relief is 12 (7) mg, after a median of four boluses. Sedation is frequent during i.v. morphine titration and should be considered as a morphine-related adverse event and not evidence of pain relief. The incidence of ventilatory depression is very low when the criteria to limit the dose of i.v. morphine are enforced. Morphine titration can be used with caution in elderly patients, in children, or in obese patients. In practice, i.v. morphine titration allows the physician to meet the needs of individual patients rapidly and limits the risk of overdose making this method the first step in postoperative pain management.

Cytokine response and reactive oxygen species production after low- and intermediate-risk surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cytokines are secreted locally in response to surgery and may be released into the systemic circulation. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production is involved in various inflammatory conditions. The aims of the study were to examine the magnitude of surgical stress on the modulation of immune response and ROS production. METHODS: Patients undergoing low- and intermediate-risk surgery (n=32) were enrolled. Blood samples for tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, interleukin (IL)1ß and IL10 assays were obtained before anesthesia, immediately after extubation, at 24 and 72 h after surgery. Measurement in whole-blood cultures of ex vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and Staphylococcus aureus Cowan (SAC)-stimulated production of cytokines was carried out. The pro-oxidant potency of the whole serum was assessed in human umbilical vein endothelial cells using a fluorescent probe after stimulation by the plasma collected at the same time intervals. RESULTS: TNFα, IL1ß and IL10 did not increase significantly after surgery in either group. Whole-blood cultures response to LPS and SAC stimulation decreased for IL1ß at the end of surgery in the two groups and returned to normal within 24 h after surgery. LPS- and SAC-induced IL10 production increased significantly at 24 h in the low-risk surgery group. ROS production was greater after more stressful surgery and was correlated to morphine consumption. CONCLUSION: Cytokine release in the systemic circulation was not well correlated to the magnitude of surgical stress, whereas transient immune hyporesponsiveness was seen after moderately stressful surgery. ROS production might be a more accurate indicator of the severity of surgical trauma.

Ondansetron does not block paracetamol-induced analgesia in a mouse model of fracture pain.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess any interaction between ondansetron and paracetamol on a model of post-fracture pain in mice. METHODS: In protocol A, after fracture of the tibia, mice were assigned to four groups: paracetamol 30 mg kg⁻¹, paracetamol 50 mg kg⁻¹, paracetamol 100 mg kg⁻¹, or a saline vehicle i.p. In protocol B, after fracture of the tibia, mice were randomized to receive either paracetamol (100 mg kg⁻¹) plus saline (vehicle), paracetamol (100 mg kg⁻¹) plus ondansetron (1 mg kg⁻¹), paracetamol (100 mg kg⁻¹) plus ondansetron (2 mg kg⁻¹), saline plus ondansetron (2 mg kg⁻¹), or saline plus saline i.p. Three tests were used to assess pain behaviour: von Frey filament application, hot-plate test, and a subjective pain scale. Rescue analgesia with morphine was administered as necessary. RESULTS: In protocol A, paracetamol (100 mg kg⁻¹)-treated animals had less mechanical nociception, thermal nociception, and a lower subjective pain scale rating, when compared with those receiving paracetamol at 30 or 50 mg kg⁻¹ or saline [ED50 paracetamol=46.3 (6.34) mg kg⁻¹]. No difference was found between paracetamol (30 mg kg⁻¹) and saline-treated animals. In protocol B, the mechanical withdrawal threshold, the thermal withdrawal latency, and the subjective pain scale were lower after injection of paracetamol (100 mg kg⁻¹)+saline, paracetamol (100 mg kg⁻¹)+ondansetron (1 mg kg⁻¹), and paracetamol (100 mg kg⁻¹)+ondansetron (2 mg kg⁻¹), whereas in mice receiving saline+ondansetron (2 mg kg⁻¹) or saline+saline, there was no difference. CONCLUSION: We found that paracetamol 100 mg kg⁻¹ blocked the development of hyperalgesia and allodynia after fracture pain and ondansetron did not modify the antinociceptive effect of paracetamol in this model.

[Effect of local anesthetics on the postoperative inflammatory response]. / Effet des anesthésiques locaux sur la réponse inflammatoire postopératoire.

Current knowledge suggests that peripheral inflammation following surgery activates and sensitizes both peripheral and central nervous system. These phenomena involved in the maintenance of the inflammatory response lead to hypersensibility, hyperalgesia and allodynia. Hyperalgesia participates in the general experience of postoperative pain and ALo in the development of chronic pain. A correlation between the ability of treatments to reduce areas of hypersensitivity surrounding the wound after surgery and their ability to reduce the incidence of chronic pain has been shown. For a long time, local anaesthetics have been used for their capacity to block nociceptive input. They can ALo modulate the inflammatory response following a surgical trauma. By inhibiting the nervous conductivity at the site of the trauma, local anesthetics attenuate the sensitization of the nervous system and therefore the inflammatory phenomena. They ALo exert intrinsic anti-inflammatory properties by modulating the local and systemic liberation of inflammatory mediators. The mechanisms involved are not clearly elucidated. Local, systemic, and spinal inflammatory mechanisms may be influenced by local anesthetics through multiple different mechanisms. The therapeutic implications of effects of local anesthetics on local, systemic, and spinal inflammatory responses merit further study.

[Drugs for status epilepticus treatment]. / Pharmacologie des agents utilisés dans l'état de mal épileptique.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of major antiepileptic agents are presented. The onset of action and the factors leading to extraction across the blood brain barrier are described as well as the mechanism and extent of metabolism, and the main interactions with other drugs. For each class, the dosing scheme and practical issues related to administration are described, based on evidence when available in the literature.

[Evaluation of perioperative risk by anaesthesiologists]. / Evaluation du risque périopératoire par les anesthésistes-réanimateurs.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this survey was to evaluate anaesthesiologists' ability to quantify a given risk of perioperative morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. METHODS: Nine hypothetical patients with well-defined single-organ failure related to three validated perioperative risk indexes (cardiac risk, respiratory-failure risk and cirrhosis decompensation) were described in vignettes and submitted to 30 anesthesiologists issued from two institutions and distributed in two groups (10 residents and 20 staff anesthesiologists). Physicians were asked to estimate the patient's risk using qualitative (scored using a categorical scale) and quantitative (scored using a number, i.e., the estimated frequency that a given complication would occur in the given case) evaluations of the considered risk for each case proposed. RESULTS: Both qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the most severe cases showed a tendency to underestimate respiratory and hepatic risks and a tendency to overestimate cardiac risk. No major difference in the accuracy of evaluations was found between trainees and staff anaesthesiologists. Both provided imprecise risk evaluation and had difficulty to define the expected level of risk, even for clear-cut clinical situations described in the vignettes. CONCLUSION: Both qualitative and quantitative evaluations were overall very imprecise. This survey showed that a rigorous evaluation of a patient's perioperative risk cannot be considered as intuitive and needs objective material supports to be performed.

Induced mild hypothermia reduces mortality during acute inflammation in rats.

BACKGROUND: Hypothermia has been proposed as a therapeutic possibility in brain trauma, cardiac arrest and hemorrhagic shock. Experimental studies have shown that hypothermia may act by modulating the inflammatory response during endotoxemia. This study was carried out to test whether hypothermia could protect rats from endotoxemic insult. METHODS: After general anesthesia and oro-tracheal intubation, Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to either a hypothermic group or normothermic group. In each group, rats received intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (10 or 20 mg/kg). Blood samples were taken prior to and 2 h after LPS injection to measure blood gases, liver enzymes, muscular enzymes, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) plasma levels. After 2 h of hypothermia, the rats were extubated and brought back to their cages. The mortality rate was observed for 7 days following endotoxemia. In a second set of experiments, hypothermia was induced 1 h after endotoxemia (10 mg/kg of intraperitoneal LPS) and the mortality rate was observed for the following 7 days. RESULTS: The survival rate was significantly increased in the hypothermic group relative to the normothermic group, regardless of LPS dose. This increased survival rate was also observed when hypothermia was induced 1 h after endotoxemia. In the hypothermic group, IL-10 and the DeltaIL-10/DeltaTNF-alpha ratio were significantly increased relative to those in the normothermic group. CONCLUSION: Induced mild hypothermia reduces mortality during endotoxemia in rats. The modulation of the inflammatory response, with an increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines, may be involved in this protective effect.

[Local anaesthetics: what can the pure S enantiomers contribute?]. / Anesthésiques locaux: qu'apportent les formes lévogyres?

The use of levobupivacaine and of ropivacaine may increase the safety of regional anaesthesia. These pure enantiomers have similar pharmacokinetic properties as those of the racemic mixtures. However, they are less cardiotoxic than the racemic mixtures, especially at the high heart rate usually encountered in infants. We may then recommend the use of these agents in the paediatric patients.

[Pre-peritoneal continuous infusion of local anesthetics for pain relief after laparotomy. A preliminary report]. / Infiltration continue prépéritonéale d'anesthésiques locaux pour l'analgésie après laparotomie. Données préliminaires.

INTRODUCTION: Continuous administration of local anesthetic through a catheter placed in the scar of a laparotomy is a postoperative analgesic technique, which seems effective but remains little developed and poorly codified. METHODS: In this prospective evaluation, we present a series of 25 observations of adult patients scheduled for abdominal laparotomy, to which a multiperforate catheter was placed at the end of the intervention by the surgeon in pre-peritoneal position, allowing the continuous perfusion of ropivacaïne over the first 48 postoperative hours. Patients received intravenous paracetamol associated with ketoprophene or nefopam. Opiates were given as rescue analgesics, in case of failure in pain relief, defined on objective criteria measured on visual analogic scale (VAS). RESULTS: The feasibility of the technique was excellent, except in one case of catheter obstruction. Pain was adequately relieved, with a majority of patients having VAS scores lower than 3/10 cm with the VAS, as well as rest as during mobilization. Only 9 patients needed morphine rescue analgesics. There was no sign of clinical overdose nor parietal complication related to the technique. Blood dosages of ropivacaine, carried out among 5 patients having received 600 mg daily, showed serum concentrations below the thresholds of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal a good effectiveness of the method, with moderate pain intensity and a low analgesic consumption. The local and general tolerance was excellent.