Surgical treatment of Peyronie's disease based on penile length and degree of curvature.

The aim of the study was to present the selection criteria for surgical techniques for the treatment of patients with Peyronie's disease. A total of 55 men with Peyronie's disease were surgically treated. We created specific criteria for selection of the appropriate surgical technique. All patients had a stable disease for 6 months and impossible vaginal intromission. All patients had subjective (as reported by the patient) and/or objective normal penile rigidity (as observed after intracavernous administration of alprostadil). Also, they all underwent drug therapy, which was unsuccessful. Among them, 40 patients with penile curvature of <60 degrees and erect penile length of >13 cm underwent Nesbit's operation, whereas plaque excision and grafting with polytetrafluoroethylene patch was performed in 15 patients with penile curvature of > or =60 degrees and/or erect penile length of < or =13 cm. At a mean (+/-s.d.) follow-up of 81.1+/-33.8 and 78.7+/-32.8 months, respectively, straightening of the penis was achieved in 35 out of 40 (87.5%) and 12 out of 15 (80%) patients, respectively, whereas erectile dysfunction developed in two out of 40 (5%) and one out of 15 (6%), respectively. Shortening of the penis occurred in all 40 patients undergoing Nesbit's operation, and in none of the patients undergoing plaque excision. Six out of 40 (15%) patients undergoing Nesbit's operation reported subjective perception of penis shortening, whereas none of the patients undergoing plaque excision complained of this discomfort. In conclusion, we recommend the selection of surgical technique based on penile length and degree of curvature. Nesbit's operation is an appropriate surgical technique for the treatment of patients with erect penile length of >13 and deviation of <60 degrees , whereas the plaque excision and grafting with polytetraflouroethylene patch is a technique of choice in the treatment of patients with erect penile length of < or =13 and/or deviation of > or =60 degrees.

Comparative analysis of bladder neck suspension using Raz, Burch and transvaginal Burch procedures. A 3-year randomized prospective study.

PURPOSE: Ever since Pereyra described needle suspension of the bladder neck for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women, numerous modifications have been presented. There were variations in the success reported by different authors. We report 3-year follow-up results in 146 women operated on for stress urinary incontinence using Raz, Burch and our own new procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 5-year period, 146 women were operated on for genuine stress urinary incontinence. Using the method of Raz, and transvaginal Burch as well as the Burch retropubic urethropexy, a modified bladder neck suspension was performed in 46 (32%), 44 (30%) and 56 (38%) patients, respectively. In all patients a prior gynecological or urological operation for urinary incontinence and a clear neuropathic condition had been excluded before surgery. The routine diagnostic procedure consisted of multichannel cystometry, voiding cystourethrography, infusion urography and cystoscopy. A pressure-flow electromyography study was done in patients with a residual volume greater than 50 ml following voiding. The operations were performed by the same surgeon (I.G.). Initial follow-up was done after 12 months and then every year. RESULTS: Urodynamic testing did not reveal significant differences between Burch and Raz (p = 0.2652), Raz and transvaginal Burch (p = 0.5745) as well as between Burch and transvaginal Burch procedures (p = 0.7602; Fisher's exact test). Three years after surgery, 50 of 56 (89.3%; Burch procedure), 37 of 46 (80.4%; Raz modification) and 38 of 44 patients (86.4%; transvaginal Burch) were continent. CONCLUSIONS: There is no reason (except patient condition) to prefer any of the numerous modifications of bladder neck suspension. We believe that the success of the operation lies in adequate mobilization of the bladder neck and urethra as well as in a surgeon's familiarity with the procedure.

[Urinary bladder incontinence after prostatectomy. Urodynamic evaluation and results of therapy]. / Inkontinencija mokrace nakon prostatektomije. Urodinamska evaluacija i rezultati lijecenja.

Forty-seven males referred due to postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (34 after transurethral resection of prostatic adenoma and 13 after open suprapubic adenomectomy) were retrospectively studied. Urodynamic evaluation identified 19 (40.4%) men with incontinence due solely to sphincter incompetence, and 19 (40.4%) men, in addition to sphincter incompetence, had urinary bladder dysfunction (unstable detrusor and/or reduced bladder compliance). Seven (14.8%) men had pure bladder dysfunction as the only cause of urinary incontinence. Two patients had normal urodynamic findings (N = 2; 4.2%). Men with urinary incontinence due only to sphincter incompetence were treated by insertion of artificial sphincter devices or condom catheter drainage (lack of artificial sphincters), while others were treated pharmacologically (imipramine, propantheline, oxybutynin or their combinations ... N = 25), or by augmentation cystoplasty using ileum after unsuccessful pharmacological treatment (N = 3). Out of 25 patients with pharmacological treatment, 21 were available for the final assessment of the treatment efficacy. Eleven (52.3%) patients were "socially continent" after the treatment. It is concluded that in the assessment of the cause of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence urodynamic evaluation is mandatory, and that the treatment should be based on the results of such studies. The role of bladder dysfunction as a cause of postsurgical urinary incontinence is again strongly emphasized.