A Core Outcome Set for the Benefits and Adverse Events of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: The BARIACT Project.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric and metabolic surgery is used as a treatment for patients with severe and complex obesity. However, there is a need to improve outcome selection and reporting in bariatric surgery trials. A Core Outcome Set (COS), an agreed minimum set of outcomes reported in all studies of a specific condition, may achieve this. Here, we present the development of a COS for BARIAtric and metabolic surgery Clinical Trials-the BARIACT Study. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Outcomes identified from systematic reviews and patient interviews informed a questionnaire survey. Patients and health professionals were surveyed three times and asked to rate the importance of each item on a 1-9 scale. Delphi methods provided anonymised feedback to participants. Items not meeting predefined criteria were discarded between rounds. Remaining items were discussed at consensus meetings, held separately with patients and professionals, where the COS was agreed. Data sources identified 2,990 outcomes, which were used to develop a 130-item questionnaire. Round 1 response rates were moderate but subsequently improved to above 75% for other rounds. After rounds 2 and 3, 81 and 14 items were discarded, respectively, leaving 35 items for discussion at consensus meetings. The final COS included nine items: "weight," "diabetes status," "cardiovascular risk," "overall quality of life (QOL)," "mortality," "technical complications of the specific operation," "any re-operation/re-intervention," "dysphagia/regurgitation," and "micronutrient status." The main limitation of this study was that it was based in the United Kingdom only. CONCLUSIONS: The COS is recommended to be used as a minimum in all trials of bariatric and metabolic surgery. Adoption of the COS will improve data synthesis and the value of research data. Future work will establish methods for the measurement of the outcomes in the COS.

A Comparison of Health Professionals' and Patients' Views of the Importance of Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: A comprehensive evaluation of bariatric surgery is required to inform decision-making. This will include measures of benefit and risk. It is possible that stakeholders involved with surgery value these outcomes differently, although this has not previously been explored. This study aimed to investigate and compare how professionals and patients prioritise outcomes of bariatric surgery. METHODS: Systematic reviews and qualitative interviews created an exhaustive list of outcomes. This informed the development of a 130-item questionnaire, structured in four sections (complications of surgery; clinical effectiveness; signs, symptoms, and other measures; quality of life). Health professionals and patients rated the importance of each item on a 1-9 scale. Items rated 8-9 by at least 70 % of the participants were considered prioritised. Items prioritised in each section were compared between professionals and patients and interrater agreement assessed using kappa statistics (ĸ). RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight out of four hundred fifty-nine professionals (36.6 %) and 90/465 patients (19.4 %) completed the questionnaire. Professionals and patients prioritised 18 and 25 items, respectively, with 10 overlapping items and 23 discordant items (ĸ 0.363). Examples of items prioritised by both included 'diabetes' and 'leakage from bowel joins'. Examples of discordant items included 're-admission rates' (professionals only) and 'excess skin' (patients only). Poor agreement was seen in the 'quality of life' section (0 overlapping items, 8 discordant, ĸ -0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was some overlap of outcomes prioritised by professionals and patients, there were important differences. We recommend that the views of all relevant health professionals and patients are considered when deciding on outcomes to evaluate bariatric surgery.

The By-Band study: gastric bypass or adjustable gastric band surgery to treat morbid obesity: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot phase.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of severe and complex obesity is increasing worldwide and surgery may offer an effective and lasting treatment. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery are the two main surgical procedures performed. DESIGN: This open parallel-group randomised controlled trial will compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of gastric band (Band) versus gastric bypass (Bypass) in adults with severe and complex obesity. It has an internal pilot phase (in two centres) with integrated qualitative research to establish effective and optimal methods for recruitment. Adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m2 or more, or a BMI of 35 kg/m2 or more and other co-morbidities will be recruited. At the end of the internal pilot the study will expand into more centres if the pre-set progression criteria of numbers and rates of eligible patients screened and randomised are met and if the expected rates of retention and adherence to treatment allocation are achieved. The trial will test the joint hypotheses that Bypass is non-inferior to Band with respect to more than 50% excess weight loss and that Bypass is superior to Band with respect to health related quality of life (HRQOL, EQ-5D) at three years. Secondary outcomes include other weight loss measures, waist circumference and remission/resolution of co-morbidities; generic and symptom-specific HRQOL; nutritional blood test results; resource use; eating behaviours and adverse events. A core outcome set for reporting the results of obesity surgery will be developed and a systematic review of the evidence for sleeve gastrectomy undertaken to inform the main study design. DISCUSSION: By-Band is the first pragmatic study to compare the two most commonly performed bariatric surgical procedures for severe and complex obesity. The design will enable and empower surgeons to learn to recruit and participate in a randomised study. Early evidence shows that timely recruitment is possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN00786323.

Isolation and characterization of human interleukin-10-secreting T cells from peripheral blood.

Recent studies have expanded our understanding of the role of the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-10, produced by multiple lineages of both human and murine T cells, in regulating the immune response. Here, we demonstrate that the small percentage of circulating CD4(+) T cells that secrete IL-10 can be isolated from human peripheral blood and, importantly, we have optimized a protocol to expand these cells in both antigen-specific and polyclonal manners. Expanded CD4(+)IL-10(+) T cells abrogate proliferation and T helper (Th) 1-like cytokine production in an antigen-specific manner, and to a lesser extent exhibit bystander suppressive capacity. CD4(+)IL-10(+) T cells are suppressive in a cell contact-dependent way, though they do not require secretion of IL-10 for their suppressive role in vitro. CD4(+)IL-10(+) T cells have an activated phenotype, with high expression of CD25, CD69, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, and are largely FoxP3 negative. This novel method for the isolation and expansion of suppressive IL-10-secreting T cells has important implications both for further research and clinical therapeutic development.

Distinct host-dependent pathogenic mechanisms leading to a similar clinical anemia after infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus.

The Docile strain of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) induces anemia in a number of inbred strains of mice, including C3HeB/FeJ and CBA/Ht animals. A difference in the kinetics of anemia and in compensatory reticulocytosis suggested that impaired erythropoiesis was the major pathogenic mechanism involved in CBA/Ht mice, but not in C3HeB/FeJ mice. In both mouse strains an antierythrocyte autoantibody production that depended on the presence of functional CD4+ T lymphocytes was observed. Although depletion of T helper lymphocytes prevented anemia in C3HeB/FeJ mice, this treatment largely failed to inhibit the development of the disease in CBA/Ht animals. This observation indicated that the antierythrocyte autoimmune response induced by the infection was at least partly responsible for the anemia of C3HeB/FeJ mice, but not of CBA/Ht mice. Erythrophagocytosis was enhanced in both mouse strains after LCMV infection, but did not appear to be a major cause of anemia. These data clearly indicate that similar disease profiles induced by the same virus in two different host strains can be the result of distinctly different mechanisms.

Natural and induced regulatory T cells.

Mucosal antigen delivery can induce tolerance, as shown by suppression of subsequent responses to antigen. Our previous work showed that both intranasal and oral routes of antigen delivery were effective but indicated that the intranasal route might be more reliable. Intranasal peptide administration induced cells that could mediate bystander suppression of responses to associated antigenic epitopes. Here, we discuss further investigation into the nature of intranasal, peptide-induced tolerance. Cells from mice treated with intranasal peptide became anergic and shut down secretion of cytokines such as IL-2, but still secreted IL-10. This latter cytokine was required for suppression of immune responses in vivo even though suppression of responses in vitro was IL-10 independent. Intranasal peptide induced a subset of CD25(-), CTLA-4(+) regulatory cells that suppressed naive cell function in vitro and in vivo. We provide evidence that these cells arise from CD25(-) precursors and differentiate independently from natural CD25(+) regulatory cells. IL-10-secreting regulatory cells are also found in the peripheral blood of humans and can be induced by soluble peptide administration. This route of tolerance induction offers promise as a means of antigen-specific immunotherapy of allergic and autoimmune conditions in humans.

Destructive processing by asparagine endopeptidase limits presentation of a dominant T cell epitope in MBP.

Little is known about the processing of putative human autoantigens and why tolerance is established to some T cell epitopes but not others. Here we show that a principal human HLA-DR2-restricted epitope--amino acids 85-99 of myelin basic protein, MBP(85-99)--contains a processing site for the cysteine protease asparagine endopeptidase (AEP). Presentation of this epitope by human antigen-presenting cells is inversely proportional to the amount of cellular AEP activity: inhibition of AEP in living cells greatly enhances presentation of the MBP(85-99) epitope, whereas overexpression of AEP diminishes presentation. These results indicate that central tolerance to this encephalitogenic MBP epitope may not be established because destructive processing limits its display in the thymus. Consistent with this hypothesis, AEP is expressed abundantly in thymic antigen-presenting cells.