[Complications of Barrett's esophagus: indications for esophageal resection with special reference to high-grade dysplasia]. / Complicanze dell'esofago di Barrett: indicazioni alla resezione esofagea. Con particolare riferimento alla displasia di alto grado.

BACKGROUND: Columnar lined oesophagus (Barrett's oesophagus) can sometimes be associated with complications such as stricture, ulcer and dysplasia. In some selected cases there is an indication for oesophageal resection. METHODS: From 1983 to 1997, 12 patients underwent oesophagectomy for "complicated" Barrett's oesophagus. All patients had gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett metaplasia for many years. Ten of them were symptomatic, and pH-manometric alterations as well as alterations were noted at biliary scintigraphy. Ten patients had intestinal metaplasia. Two patients had previous antireflux operations. Four had a long (3-5 cm) and undilatable stricture. One was affected by a perforating ulcer. One patient had an indefinite grade dysplasia but endosonography revealed high suspicion of cancer. Six patients had a high-grade dysplasia. Operative technique consisted of a transhiatal oesophagectomy in nine cases and a laparotomic and right thoracotomic oesophagectomy (Ivor-Lewis) in two. RESULTS: There was no 30-day mortality; three post operative complications were observed. One of the four patients suffering from stricture died four years after intervention due to non-related causes; the other three are still living and regularly feed per os after 12, 9 and 7 years. The patient with ulcer is still living after 6 years and regularly feeding per os. The patient suffering from an indefinite grade dysplasia had an adenocarcinoma (stage IIa) on the operative specimen. The patient is still living after 2 years. Three patients operated for high-grade dysplasia had an adenocarcinoma on the specimen. Two patients (stage I) are living after 3 and 5 years. One patient (stage IIa) died after 19 months with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In case of non neoplastic "complicated" Barrett's oesophagus the indication for the oesophageal resection can be considered as the extreme useful therapy only after an accurate selection of patients. Especially in case of high-grade dysplasia, the great incidence of unexpected adenocarcinoma indicates oesophagectomy for patients who are suitable for surgery.

Efficacy of combined treatments in NIDDM patients with secondary failure to sulphonylureas. Is it predictable?

The treatment of NIDDM patients with secondary failure to sulphonylurea is a common problem. We performed a crossover study in 50 NIDDM patients with secondary failure to glibenclamide by comparing the addition to sulphonylurea of either a low-dose bedtime NPH insulin or a t.i.d. oral metformin and by analyzing treatment efficacy in relation to patient and disease characteristics. Both combined therapies clearly improved glycaemic control. HbA1 c were similarly reduced by the addition of either bedtime NPH insulin (7.6+/-0.34 vs 8.7+/-0.35, p<0.01) or metformin (7.6+/-0.22 vs 8.6+/-0.31, p<0.01). Also fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and post-prandial plasma glucose (PPPG) significantly decreased (p<0.01) with both treatments. Bed-time NPH insulin was more effective on FPG reduction than metformin (-36+/-2% vs -25+/-2%, p<0.01); in contrast, metformin addition was more effective on PPPG reduction than bedtime NPH insulin addition (-30+/-2% vs 20+/-3%, p<0.01). Serum cholesterol was marginally but significantly decreased after metformin (5.49+/-0.19 vs 5.91 +/-0.18 mM, p<0.05) but not after NPH insulin. Body weight increase was significantly greater after insulin addition than after metformin (1.47+/-0.25 Kg vs 0.64+/-0.17 p=0.02). All patients preferred the addition of metformin rather than NPH insulin. None of the measured clinical and metabolic variables (before treatment FPG and PPPG, HbA1 c, post-glucagon C-peptide levels, insulin sensitivity, patient age, BMI and diabetes duration) significantly correlated to the efficacy of the two combined treatments studied. In conclusion, in NIDDM patients with secondary failure to sulphonylureas the addition of either low-dose bedtime NPH insulin or t.i.d. metformin is similarly effective in improving glycaemic control. Metformin is better accepted by patients and provides a modest advantage in terms of body weight and cholesterol levels. The most common clinical and metabolic variables are not useful for predicting the efficacy of these two combined treatments.

Comparison of combined therapies in treatment of secondary failure to glyburide.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of alternative combined treatments in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) with secondary failure to sulfonylureas. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A crossover study was carried out by randomly assigning 16 NIDDM patients to a combined treatment with the addition of either a single low-dose bedtime injection of 0.2 U/kg body wt NPH insulin or an oral three times a day administration of 1.5 g/day metformin to the previously ineffective glyburide treatment. RESULTS: Both combined therapies significantly (P less than 0.01) reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPPG) and percentage of HbA1. The addition of metformin was more effective than the addition of insulin (P less than 0.01) in improving PPPG in the 8 patients with higher post-glucagon C-peptide levels. In contrast, the efficacy of neither combined therapy was related to patient age, age of diabetes onset, duration of the disease, percentage of ideal body weight, and FPG. The addition of insulin but not metformin caused a significant (P less than 0.01) increase of mean body weight. Neither combined treatment caused changes in serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels. No symptomatic hypoglycemic episode was reported in any of the 16 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of bedtime NPH insulin or metformin was effective in improving the glycemic control in most NIDDM patients with secondary failure to glyburide. The combination of metformin and sulfonylurea was more effective in reducing PPPG and did not induce any increase of body weight.

Treatment of NIDDM patients with secondary failure to glyburide: comparison of the addition of either metformin or bed-time NPH insulin to glyburide.

In this study we compared, in 12 NIDDM patients with secondary failure to glyburide, the effect of adding either a single, low-dose bed time NPH insulin injection (0.2 U/Kg) or an oral metformin administration (500 mg x 3) to the previously ineffective sulfonylurea treatment. The addition of both insulin and metformin treatment significantly improved fasting plasma glucose, post-prandial plasma glucose and %HbA1. The effect of both combined therapies was already evident and maximal after 2 weeks of treatment. The addition of bed-time NPH insulin caused a greater decrease of fasting plasma glucose, although the difference with the addition of metformin was not significant. In contrast, the average post-prandial plasma glucose decrease was significantly greater after metformin addition. The addition of bed-time NPH insulin caused a significant increase in average body weight, while after metformin addition, average body weight was unchanged; no change in the average cholesterol and triglyceride level was observed after either combined therapies.

Low-dose bedtime NPH insulin in treatment of secondary failure to glyburide.

Secondary failure to oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) is a possible outcome for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients and poses a serious therapeutic problem. In this study, we evaluated the effect of adding a single bedtime low-dose NPH insulin injection to the previous ineffective sulfonylurea therapy in 23 NIDDM patients with true secondary failure to OHAs. This treatment schedule was conducted for 3 mo by 18 patients (78%) who completed the study. In these patients, the addition of NPH insulin (0.2 +/- 0.01 IU/kg body wt) greatly decreased fasting and postprandial plasma glucose (P less than .001) and glycosylated hemoglobin (P less than .005). No weight gain was observed in any of the patients studied. Five patients dropped out: 2 patients (9%) due to insufficient compliance, 2 patients (9%) due to the multiple insulin injections required to achieve good metabolic control, and 1 patient (4%) due to recurrent hypoglycemic episodes. No correlation was observed between glucagon-stimulated C-peptide values and amelioration of metabolic control. In conclusion, most NIDDM patients with secondary failure to OHAs may be successfully treated with the addition of a single low-dose bedtime NPH insulin injection, and residual beta-cell function evaluation is not able to predict the effectiveness of the combined treatment.