Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37174240

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 lockdowns greatly affected the mental health of populations and collectives. This study compares the mental health and self-perceived health in five countries of Latin America and Spain, during the first wave of COVID 19 lockdown, according to social axes of inequality. This was a cross-sectional study using an online, self-managed survey in Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and Spain. Self-perceived health (SPH), anxiety (measured through GAD-7) and depression (measured through PHQ-9) were measured along with lockdown, COVID-19, and social variables. The prevalence of poor SPH, anxiety, and depression was calculated. The analyses were stratified by gender (men = M; women = W) and country. The data from 39,006 people were analyzed (W = 71.9%). There was a higher prevalence of poor SPH and bad mental health in women in all countries studied. Peru had the worst SPH results, while Chile and Ecuador had the worst mental health indicators. Spain had the lowest prevalence of poor SPH and mental health. The prevalence of anxiety and depression decreased as age increased. Unemployment, poor working conditions, inadequate housing, and the highest unpaid workload were associated with worse mental health and poor SPH, especially in women. In future policies, worldwide public measures should consider the great social inequalities in health present between and within countries in order to tackle health emergencies while reducing the health breach between populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Male , Humans , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Mental Health , Latin America/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Communicable Disease Control , Socioeconomic Factors , Anxiety/epidemiology , Health Status , Depression/epidemiology
2.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 36(6): 526-533, nov.-dic. 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-212583

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Analizar los factores sociales asociados a la salud autopercibida durante el confinamiento en la población residente en Chile según la perspectiva de género. Método: Estudio transversal realizado mediante encuesta online durante el confinamiento por la COVID-19 entre el 17 de mayo y el 17 de agosto de 2020. Se analizó la salud autopercibida en población de 18 años o más en relación con variables sociales. Se construyeron modelos de regresión logística multivariante para evaluar la asociación entre las variables independientes con la salud autopercibida, a través de odds ratio ajustadas (ORa). Los análisis se estratificaron por sexo (H: hombres; M: mujeres). Resultados: Se analizaron 5981 personas (el 63,9% mujeres). El 29,6% de las mujeres y el 19,2% de los hombres reportaron mala salud autopercibida. En las mujeres, empeora al aumentar la edad. La peor salud autopercibida se asoció principalmente con la falta de apoyo social (ORa H: 2,05; ORa M: 2,34), la preocupación por la convivencia en el hogar (ORa H: 1,66; ORa M: 1,38), percibir inadecuadas condiciones de la vivienda (ORa H: 1,89; ORa M: 2,63) y el desacuerdo con las medidas gubernamentales (ORa H: 2,80; ORa M: 1,82). En las mujeres, además, se asoció al trabajo informal o estar inactivas laboralmente (ORa: 2,11). En los hombres, una peor salud autopercibida se asoció a ser trabajador independiente (autónomo) (ORa: 1,65; intervalo de confianza [IC]: 1,11-2,45) y tener educación secundaria (ORa: 2,81; IC: 1,32-5,98). Conclusiones: El impacto social del confinamiento en la salud autopercibida se relaciona con el género, la edad, el trabajo de cuidados y las condiciones socioeconómicas, así como con el desacuerdo con las medidas implementadas para gestionar la pandemia.


Objective: To analyse the social factors associated with self-perceived health during the COVID-19 lockdown in the Chilean resident population according to gender perspective. Method: Cross-sectional study conducted during the COVID-19 lockdown between May 17 and August 17, 2020 with an online survey. Self-perceived health was analysed in the population aged 18 years or older in relation to social variables. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to assess the association between independent variables with self-perceived health, through adjusted odds ratio (aOR). Analyses were stratified by sex (M: men; W: women). Results: 5981 persons were analysed (women: 63.9%). 29.6% of women and 19.2% of men reported poor self-perceived health. In women it worsens with increasing age. Worse self-perceived health was mainly associated with lack of social support (ORa M: 2.05; ORa W: 2.34), concern about living together at home (ORa M: 1.66; ORa W: 1.38), perceived inadequate housing conditions (ORa M: 1.89; ORa W: 2.63), and disagreement with government measures (ORa M: 2.80; ORa W: 1.82). In women, it was also associated with informal work or being inactive in the labour market (ORa: 2.11). In men worse self-perceived health was associated with being self-employed (ORa: 1.65; confidence interval [CI]: 1.11–2.45) and has secondary education (ORa: 2.81; CI: 1.32–5.98). Conclusions: The social impact of lockdown in self-perceived health is related to gender, age, care work, and socioeconomic conditions, as well as, by disagreement with the measures implemented to manage the pandemic. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Quarantine , Gender Identity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Chile , Social Determinants of Health
3.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 277, 2022 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35854284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Long-term home non-invasive ventilation (LTH-NIV) has an impact on the health-related quality of life of patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CRF) of different causes. There are generic and specific questionnaires for respiratory diseases. In 2003 a specific questionnaire was developed for patients with CRF in LTH-NIV, called the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency (SRI) questionnaire, which has been shown to be reproducible and reliable and has been validated in several languages. The aim of the study was to translate and culturally adapt the SRI questionnaire for adult Chilean patients under LTH-NIV, and to assess its psychometric properties. METHODS: The Chilean version of the SRI was obtained using the translation-back translation method, which was then applied by cross-sectional study to a non-probabilistic convenience sample of stable patients from five regions of Chile. The validated Chilean version of the SRI questionnaire and SF-36 (gold standard) questionnaire were applied, demographic and ventilatory data were collected. Reliability was analysed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation (test-retest). Construct validity was tested using exploratory factor analysis (principal component extraction and equimax orthogonal rotation) and hypothesis testing (Mann-Whitney test). Convergent criterion validity was tested using Spearman's rho. RESULTS: The sample comprised 248 patients, 132 women (53.2%), median age (IQR) was 62 years (51-75), 146 patients (58.9%) were 60 years or older, 40% had a low education level. The mean ± SD completion time of the questionnaire was 18.8 ± 9.1 min, and 100% of the items were answered. The questionnaire was self-applied by 46.8% of the sample. The validated Chilean version of the SRI questionnaire showed very good overall reliability (0.95) and by scales (> 0.7). It showed a good correlation with the SF-36, with equivalent scales, a rotated matrix with 8 factors and hypotheses that explain the underlying constructs. CONCLUSIONS: The validated Chilean version of the SRI questionnaire has good psychometric properties. It is feasible, valid, and reliable for application to evaluate patients with CRF in LTH-NIV. It was found to be sensitive to assess the characteristics of the local population.


Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Respiratory Insufficiency , Adult , Chile , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Translations
4.
Gac Sanit ; 36(6): 526-533, 2022.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35589458

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the social factors associated with self-perceived health during the COVID-19 lockdown in the Chilean resident population according to gender perspective. METHOD: Cross-sectional study conducted during the COVID-19 lockdown between May 17 and August 17, 2020 with an online survey. Self-perceived health was analysed in the population aged 18 years or older in relation to social variables. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to assess the association between independent variables with self-perceived health, through adjusted odds ratio (aOR). Analyses were stratified by sex (M: men; W: women). RESULTS: 5981 persons were analysed (women: 63.9%). 29.6% of women and 19.2% of men reported poor self-perceived health. In women it worsens with increasing age. Worse self-perceived health was mainly associated with lack of social support (ORa M: 2.05; ORa W: 2.34), concern about living together at home (ORa M: 1.66; ORa W: 1.38), perceived inadequate housing conditions (ORa M: 1.89; ORa W: 2.63), and disagreement with government measures (ORa M: 2.80; ORa W: 1.82). In women, it was also associated with informal work or being inactive in the labour market (ORa: 2.11). In men worse self-perceived health was associated with being self-employed (ORa: 1.65; confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.45) and has secondary education (ORa: 2.81; CI: 1.32-5.98). CONCLUSIONS: The social impact of lockdown in self-perceived health is related to gender, age, care work, and socioeconomic conditions, as well as, by disagreement with the measures implemented to manage the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Male , Humans , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Chile/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Sex Factors , Communicable Disease Control , Health Status
5.
Rev. Fac. Cienc. Méd. Univ. Cuenca ; 31(2): 44-51, Julio 2013. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1006005

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Describir e identificar los factores que se relacionan con la expectativa de emigrar de los internos de medicina de la Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador. Material y Métodos: Estudio transversal analítico. Se encuestó a internos de medicina en su lugar de práctica. Se presentó medidas de frecuencia, de posición y de dispersión, se realizó un análisis de Chi cuadrado (Prueba X2) y se utilizó modelos de regresión logística simple. Se describió el odds ratio y su respectivo intervalo de confianza al 95%. Resultados: Participaron 152 internos de medicina de la Universidad de Cuenca, el 72,4% están interesados en emigrar motivados en su mayor parte por razones educativas. Entre los destinos más requeridos están: España, México, Argentina, Chile y Estados Unidos. El 3,6% indicó que no regresaría al país. Se identificaron como factores protectores relacionados con el interés de emigrar a provenir de otras provincias (OR:0,19; IC 95%: 0,04-0,83) y estudiar en Ecuador en el caso de que su postgrado se imparta en el país (OR:0,24; IC 95%: 0,08-0,69), como factores de riesgo a trabajar en una zona urbana (OR:4,33; IC 95%: 1,15-16,24) y cumplir con expectativa de ingreso económico en un país distinto al Ecuador (OR:2,76; IC 95%: 1,24-6,14). Conclusión: Se encontró un elevado porcentaje de futuros médicos que piensan emigrar, en su mayor parte, interesados en acceder a una especialidad para su desarrollo profesional, siendo los países con un mejor desarrollo económico sus destinos de preferencia.


Objective: To describe and identify factors related to the expectations of potential emigrant medical interns from University of Cuenca, Ecuador, 2012. Material and Methods: An analytical crosssectional study. Medical interns were surveyed in their places of practice. Measures of frequency, position and dispersion were presented. The Chisquare test and simple logistic regression were used. The odds ratio and its respective confidence interval of 95% were described. Results: 152 medical interns of University of Cuenca participated. Of those, 72.4% said they were interested in emigrating. They were highly motivated for educational reasons. The most requested destinations were: Spain, Mexico, Argentina, Chile and the United States. 3.6% of medical interns said they would not return to Ecuador. Protective factors related to emigration interest were identified as: coming from provinces other than Azuay (OR: 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.83) and whether it is possible to study their chosen specialty in Ecuador (OR: 0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.69). Risk factors were identified as: working in an urban area (OR: 4.33, 95% CI 1.15 to 16.24) and meeting financial expectations in another country (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.24 to 6.14). Conclusion: The study found that a high percentage of doctors are thinking of emigrating. They are interested in accessing a specialty for their professional development. Countries with better economic development are their preferred destinations.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Students, Medical , Emigration and Immigration , Motivation , Economic Development , Multivariate Analysis , Professional Training
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...