ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Literature suggests colonic resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) instead of Hartmann's procedure (HP) for the treatment of left-sided colonic emergencies. We aim to evaluate the surgical options globally used to treat patients with acute left-sided colonic emergencies and the factors that leading to the choice of treatment, comparing HP and RPA. METHODS: This is a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. A total 1215 patients with left-sided colonic emergencies who required surgery were included from 204 centers during the period of March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020. with a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: 564 patients (43.1%) were females. The mean age was 65.9 ± 15.6 years. HP was performed in 697 (57.3%) patients and RPA in 384 (31.6%) cases. Complicated acute diverticulitis was the most common cause of left-sided colonic emergencies (40.2%), followed by colorectal malignancy (36.6%). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) were higher in the HP group (P < 0.001). 30-day mortality was higher in HP patients (13.7%), especially in case of bowel perforation and diffused peritonitis. 1-year follow-up showed no differences on ostomy reversal rate between HP and RPA. (P = 0.127). A backward likelihood logistic regression model showed that RPA was preferred in younger patients, having low ASA score (≤ 3), in case of large bowel obstruction, absence of colonic ischemia, longer time from admission to surgery, operating early at the day working hours, by a surgeon who performed more than 50 colorectal resections. CONCLUSIONS: After 100 years since the first Hartmann's procedure, HP remains the most common treatment for left-sided colorectal emergencies. Treatment's choice depends on patient characteristics, the time of surgery and the experience of the surgeon. RPA should be considered as the gold standard for surgery, with HP being an exception.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Emergencies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Male , Prospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
Introduction: The finding of a vermiform appendix within the peritoneal sac of an indirect inguinal hernia occurs in approximately 1% of cases. However, the presence of appendicitis within an inguinal hernial sac is found only in 0.08% of the general population. Case Report: We present the case of a 58-year-old male patient that was admitted with abdominal pain associated with a small non-reducible right groin mass. Discussion: To establish the correct diagnosis preoperatively, an abdominal and pelvic CT scan is mandatory. Conclusion: Acute appendicitis in an Amyand's hernia is a very rare entity that can be easily misdiagnosed preoperatively. CT is extremely useful in reaching the correct preoperative diagnosis.
Introducción: El hallazgo de un apéndice vermiforme dentro del saco peritoneal de una hernia inguinal indirecta ocurre en aproximadamente el 1% de los casos. Sin embargo, la presencia de apendicitis dentro de un saco herniario inguinal se encuentra sólo en el 0.08% de la población general. Caso clínico: Presentamos el caso de un paciente masculino de 58 años que ingresa por dolor abdominal asociado a una pequeña masa inguinal derecha no reducible. Discusión: Para establecer el diagnóstico correcto preoperatorio, es obligatoria una tomografía computarizada de abdomen y pelvis. Conclusión: La apendicitis aguda en la hernia de Amyand es una entidad muy rara que puede diagnosticarse erróneamente fácilmente en el preoperatorio. La TC es de gran utilidad para llegar al correcto diagnóstico preoperatorio.
