Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Transplant Proc ; 37(2): 669-71, 2005 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15848496

ABSTRACT

A multicenter study was undertaken involving three teams in Italy to obtain a homogeneous psychological evaluation of patients needing organ transplantations. After a preliminary formulation of a common questionnaire individualizing 22 items, yielding a final score from 0 to 44, 294 forms were analyzed for correlations between variables. The sample responses were related to individual variables as well as by cluster analysis to aggregate typical profiles. Clustering of variables was observed in three areas that showed two variables (no. 6, "ongoing psychotic disturbances" and no. 10 "drugs") to be separate. Area 1 ("psychopathology") highlights psychic disturbances, cognitive disorders, and unhealthy behavioral styles; area 2 ("anxia") correlates anxious symptoms to pretransplant examinations and waiting time; area 3 ("depression") ties personal emotional resources and affective factors. Cluster analysis of the sample identified four groups: Group 1 (16.6%) "at risk;" mean score 25.2 (range 16-31); Group 2 (21.7%) "intermediate-at risk," mean score 32 (range 25-38); Group 3 (29.6%) "intermediate-ideal," mean score 35.3 (range 26-40); and Group 4 (31.9%) "ideal candidate," mean score 40.7 (range 36-44). The two "intermediate" groups were studied for mean values for area 1; namely, a cut-off value of 1.78 constituted a better or worse prognostic factor to assign the patient to either Group 2 or 3. Using a uniform method of psychological evaluation before transplantation reduced single operator subjectivity, obtaining comparable results in different transplant centers and allowing planning interventions for at-risk patients.


Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation/psychology , Kidney Transplantation/psychology , Patient Care Team , Waiting Lists , Cluster Analysis , Female , Humans , Italy , Male , Mental Disorders/classification , Middle Aged , Psychometrics/methods , Psychotic Disorders/classification , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 36(2): 225-46, 2000.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11213654

ABSTRACT

The aim of this report is introducing with a series of psychological, psychiatric and psychosocial problems, that can arise, at every point, in the procedure of organ transplantations. Different areas of intervention are considered: the assistance to the patients and their families during the pre- and post-operative periods; the evaluation of transplant recipients' quality of life; ethical and psychological problems of living kidney donation; psychosocial support to donors' families; the training of the intensive therapy units to entertain relationships with donors' relatives; the delicate psychological aspects of transplantation during childhood. The sense of awareness about these matters is growing in Italy too, and many initiatives of psychological and psychiatric help are being developed in collaboration with several transplantation centres.


Subject(s)
Organ Transplantation/psychology , Postoperative Care , Preoperative Care , Adult , Child , Family Health , Humans , Italy , Living Donors , Quality of Life
4.
Cortex ; 30(4): 603-18, 1994 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7697987

ABSTRACT

This study was aimed at identifying the impaired attentional components in patients who had sustained a severe CHI several years before. A group of 14 CHI patients and a Control group (matched for age, sex and education) were tested. Experiment 1 used a dual-task paradigm (Umiltà et al., 1992). The double task-single task difference was greater for the CHI group, indicating a specific damage at a central executive stage where decision are made and responses are coordinated. Experiment 2 used a task-shifting paradigm (Morra and Roncato, 1986). The cost of shifting from one task to the other was greater for the CHI group, but only in the Short Series Condition where a new task-program could be pre-activated. Experiment 3 studied visual selective attention using Navon paradigm (1977); in this case, there was no difference between patients and controls.


Subject(s)
Attention/physiology , Head Injuries, Closed/psychology , Adult , Brain Mapping , Decision Making/physiology , Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Female , Frontal Lobe/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Photic Stimulation , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...