Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Int ; 63(5): 575-580, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32979010

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dog bites are a major cause of traumatic injury in children. The aim of this study was to determine the experience, management, and outcome of dog bite injuries in our department. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records for 127 patients (mean age 7.15 ± 4.24 years, range 1 to 17 years; 68 males) affected by dog-related injuries, from 2012 to 2018. Characteristics of patients and dogs, type and severity of injuries, circumstances of the accidents, treatment and outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 141 wounds, 73 (51.8%) affected the head and neck, 62 (44%) the limbs, and six (4.2%) affected the trunk. According to the Mcheik classification, 107 lesions (75.9%) were stage 1, 26 (18.4%) stage 2, and eight (5.7%) stage 3. Seventy-eight percent of the cases involved known dogs. The breed of the dog was recorded in 62/127 cases (48.8%) and the most common were mongrels (23/62, 37.1%). Seventy-five percent of the attacks occurred during spring and summer. All patients underwent antibiotic prophylaxis and immediate surgical repair. Wound infection was observed in two patients. Three unsightly scars required rectification, with good cosmetic results in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our results are consistent with previous data showing that the typical dog-related injury occurs from a known dog, during spring and summer, and in younger boys, who are frequently exposed to head and neck wounds. Our experience showed the feasibility and safety of primary repair and antibiotic prophylaxis in all patients, with very low incidence of infection and good cosmetic results.


Subject(s)
Bites and Stings , Facial Injuries , Animals , Bites and Stings/epidemiology , Bites and Stings/therapy , Child , Dogs , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Healthcare
2.
J Pediatr ; 163(5): 1278-82.e1, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23941670

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of 2.5 vs 4 g/kg/d of amino acid (AA) in parenteral nutrition of extremely low birth weight infants on metabolic tolerance, short-term growth, and neurodevelopment. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred thirty-one infants with birth weight between 500 and 1249 g were randomized to 2.5 (standard AA [SAA] group) or 4 (high AA [HAA] group) g/kg/d AA intake, with equal nonprotein energy. The primary outcome was body size at 36 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients were randomized and 114 analyzed (58 SAA group and 56 HAA group). Study groups had similar demographics and clinical characteristics. Elevated blood urea (BU >70 mg/dL = BU nitrogen >32.6 mg/dL) occurred in 24% vs 59% (P = .000) and hyperglycemia (>175 mg/dL) in 34% vs 11% (P = .003) of the SAA and HAA patients, respectively. Body weight, length, and head circumference at 36 weeks and 2 years were similar between groups. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition score was 94 ± 13 in the SAA group and 97 ± 15 in the HAA group (P = .35). CONCLUSIONS: The HAA group had higher BU levels and better glucose control. An extra 8 g/kg of AA over the first 10 days of life did not improve growth and neurodevelopment.


Subject(s)
Amino Acids/administration & dosage , Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight , Nervous System/growth & development , Birth Weight , Body Height , Body Weight , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Male , Nervous System/drug effects , Nitrogen/therapeutic use , Parenteral Nutrition , Time Factors , Urea/blood , Weight Gain/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...