Shoulder Function After Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: 5-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) represents the main tool for prevention of sudden cardiac death. Different kinds of postimplant complications have been described; however, little is known about shoulder functional impairment and its impact on quality of life. METHODS: Patients with standard indications for elective prepectoral subcutaneous ICD insertion were enrolled during a 1-year period. The impact of ICD implantation on shoulder motility, pain, general disability, and quality of life was evaluated prospectively at baseline, and after 2 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years using the Constant score, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scale, and the Short Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients underwent insertion of single, dual chamber, or biventricular ICDs. Two weeks after implantation, functional impairment and mild pain were observed in ipsilateral shoulder movements, with a reduction in the Short Form-36 Health Survey score. Shoulder functional impairment improved at the third-month evaluations, with almost normalization at 1-year and 5-year assessments, as well as pain and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral subcutaneous ICD implantation may be associated with ipsilateral shoulder functional impairment that regresses partially after 3 months and completely at 1-year and 5-year assessments. The less invasive implantation technique and the relatively small size of modern ICDs, independently from types and volumes, may be relevant to the degree of postimplantation shoulder functional impairment and recovery time. Shoulder function should be assessed at routine checks, especially soon after ICD implantation because of potential functional impairment and subsequent impact on quality of life.

Electrocardiographic Eligibility for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Evaluation during Bicycle Exercise.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is used in patients at risk of sudden death. Our aim was to assess clinical predictors of electrocardiographic ineligibility for S-ICD, and the impact of exercise on S-ICD eligibility in an unselected series of patients requiring ICD therapy. METHODS: 102 patients at risk of sudden death were evaluated at rest and during exercise. Electrocardiograph screening using limb lead electrodes (to simulate the S-ICD sensing vectors) was performed at rest and during bicycle ergometer exercise. RESULTS: R wave amplitude in lead D3 during exercise >16mV, baseline QTc and the sum of amplitudes of the R waves at supine >30mV were predictors of ineligibility for S-ICD. Eligibility increased from 90% to 100% of patients when evaluated with an "any of the three leads" criterion compared to current recommendations. A more restrictive criterion based on two of three ECG leads caused an eligibility drop at 66%, that further decreased to 56% during exercise; these figures improved to 79% and 81%, respectively, when an "any 2 of 3 leads" criterion was used. CONCLUSIONS: Huge ECG amplitude and QTc duration are associated with ineligibility in the current S-ICD release. By performing exercise testing, lead suitability changes in one patient out of 14 (7% of tested patients) and eligibility is decreased by use of a more stringent criterion for eligibility (ECG criteria satisfied in two of three leads). A dynamic selection of sensing vectors aiming at situation-specific suitability (any of three leads) would increase S-ICD eligibility to 100% of patients.

Predictors of nonsimultaneous interventricular delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization.

AIM: Cardiac resynchronization is a well tolerated and effective therapy for heart failure, but 30% of patients still do not respond to biventricular pacing. Optimization of device settings, in particular interventricular delay value, represents a plausible target for improving these results, but available literature is discordant. We aimed our study at the identification of the best suitable candidates to interventricular delay optimization. METHODS: A total of 77 consecutive patients with optimized drugs therapy underwent clinical, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic evaluation before and after 6 months from implantation of a biventricular defibrillator in accordance to current guidelines. In each patient, atrioventricular and interventricular delay values were optimized at predischarge with echocardiogram. RESULTS: The only predictor of an optimized interventricular delay value different from simultaneous (i.e. standard shipment setting), at both univariate and multivariate analyses, was a QRS duration greater than 160 ms (odds ratio 22.958; P = 0.003) with a sensitivity of 70.9%. CONCLUSION: Candidates to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a basal QRS greater than 160 ms have a higher chance of requiring echo-guided tailoring of interventricular delay value. A strategy based on these data can potentially improve device programming, reducing by one-third the need for optimization, according to our findings, and at the same time avoid unnecessary time-consuming procedures.

From lead management to implanted patient management: systematic review and meta-analysis of the last 15 years of experience in lead extraction.

Percutaneous lead extraction is considered a safe and effective procedure, although published results derive primarily from cohort studies. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the last 15 years' experience in this field, to give an objective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this procedure. Moreover, the subsequent metaregression analysis enabled the identification of the main factors influencing these results: patient age, presence of leads in situ for more than 1 year, presence of device infection and use of laser sheath. These findings are significant in order to improve our extraction approach, data reporting and future research.

Implantation of cardioverter-defibrillator: effects on shoulder function.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous almost substituted subpectoral approach of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation as a less invasive surgical technique. However, the impact of this change in placement site on procedure-related shoulder impairment is poorly understood. METHODS: Candidates for ICD implantation were prospectively evaluated at baseline, 2-weeks and 3-months after the procedure. Assessment of shoulder function included: Constant Score, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scoring method. The Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire was adopted for quality of life. RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients were enrolled (21 single-chamber, 5 dual-chamber and 24 biventricular ICD). Significant changes in the short term were observed: physical component summary (regarding SF-36) decreased from 44.5 ± 9.1 to 41.8 ± 11.4 (p=0.016), patients with NRS >1 increased from 14% to 44% (p<0.001), DASH score increased from 1.29 [interquartile range 0.00-10.34] to 30.60 [interquartile range 12.93-46.34] (p<0.001). Notably, only the shoulder ipsilateral to implantation site presented a decrease in Constant Score (76.00 [interquartile range 61.37-86.87] vs. 95.75 [interquartile range 91.37-98.00]; p<0.001). After three months most of the parameters seemed to have recovered, except for range of motion. Procedure-related increase in pain (i.e. NRS increase ≥ 1 point) was the most important independent predictor of shoulder impairment, in terms of Constant Score modification (r=0.570; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ICD implantation is frequently associated with ipsilateral shoulder impairment which tends to recover within 3-months. These data positively compare with the subpectoral approach and should be considered for future research regarding impact of ICD implant on physical well-being and quality of life.

How to truly value implantable cardioverter-defibrillators technology: up-front cost or daily cost?

BACKGROUND: We calculated the daily cost of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) based on their actual longevity to prove whether the up-front cost is a reliable parameter for the ICD purchasing-process. METHODS. Longevity of single chamber (SC), double chamber (DC), and biventricular (BiV) ICDs from Medtronic (MDT), Guidant (GDT), and St. Jude Medical (SJM) was measured in all the patients implanted in years 2000, 2001, 2002 who reached device replacement within December 31, 2009. The cost of each ICD (device + lead/s) was normalized for its own longevity. Data are expressed as median (25th-75th percentile). RESULTS: A total of 123/153 patients completed the study, 70 percent being alive 8 years after implantation. MDT devices had a superior longevity compared with GDT and SJM (p < .001). Fifty-eight percent of replaced ICDs had a service life at least 1 year shorter than the manufacturers' prediction. Longer-lasting devices had a significantly lower daily cost: €4.8 (4.6-5.7) versus €6.8 (6.2-9.2) and €6.9 (6.2-7.6) for SC (p < .001); €6.9 (6.8-7.7) versus €12.6 (11.8-13.3) and €13.4 (10.3-16.1) for DC; €8.5 (8.3-10.3) versus €15.4 (15.1-15.8) and €14.6 (14.1-14.9) for BiV (p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: The true cost of ICD treatment is strictly dependent on device longevity, whereas device up-front cost is unreliable. This aspect should be valued in the technology purchasing process, and could set the basis for an outcome-based reimbursement system. Our observations may be the benchmark respectively for ICD longevity and daily ICD cost in future comparisons. Independent observations in the real-life scenario are needed to properly value newer technologic improvements.

Management of phrenic stimulation in CRT patients over the long term: still an unmet need ?

BACKGROUND: Phrenic stimulation (PS) may cause intolerable symptoms and prevent CRT delivery in 2-5% of patients. We sought to ensure effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) delivery by management of PS at the left ventricular (LV) target site. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and eleven consecutive patients received a CRT device despite PS occurrence at the LV target site at implantation, when a PS-LV difference >2V was achieved by LV stimulation programming (cathode, pacing vector). PS management strategy both at implantation and at follow-up (FU) aimed to keep the target LV implantation site. LV reverse remodeling was assessed by echocardiography before implantation and at follow-up. LV lead placement was lateral/posterolateral in all the 211 patients; 51 of 211 had detectable PS at FU, 26 of 211 (12.3%) were symptomatic. Symptoms occurred more frequently when PS-LV difference was <3V (16/16 vs 10/35, P < 0.001). Cathode and pacing vector reprogramming improved the PS-LV difference and symptoms in 14 of 23 patients. LV output as threshold +0.5V was helpful to manage PS symptoms in patients with a PS-LV ≤2V at FU. Median FU was 34.9 (16-50) months: 12 patients had tolerable PS symptoms, 76% (39/51) were objective responders at echocardiography compared to 74% (119/160) in patients without PS (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: CRT delivery at long term is feasible despite PS at the target LV site. PS management is mandatory in about 12.3% of patients at FU, with 6.6% remaining symptomatic. Symptoms improve at FU when a PS-LV >3V is achieved. Further improvement in lead manufacturing and pacing electronics are awaited to meet this clinical need.

Long-term RV threshold behavior by automated measurements: safety is the standpoint of pacemaker longevity!

BACKGROUND: We studied long-term right ventricular (RV) pacing threshold (RVPT) behavior in patients consecutively implanted with pacemakers capable of automatic output reprogramming tracked by automatic RV threshold measurement (automatic verification of capture [AVC]). METHODS: All the patients had state-of-the art steroid-eluting bipolar pacing leads and were RV-paced by an AVC algorithm from the three American manufacturers. Follow-up occurred twice in the first year after implantation, then yearly until approaching elective replacement indicator. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-one patients aged 73 ± 12 years were observed for 49 ± 26 months on average. At implantation, RVPT was 0.54 ± 0.2 V at 0.4 ms at an average 774 ± 217 Ω impedance. Forty-one of the 321 patients (12.8%) had a permanent RVPT increase above 1.5 V at 0.4 ms: RVPT was between 1.6 and 2.5 V in 29 of 321 (9%) patients, whereas it was between 2.6 and 3.5 V in seven of 321 (2.2%) patients, and >3.5 V in five of 321 (1.5%) patients. No exit block occurred because of automatic RV output adjustment by AVC algorithms. No predictor of RVPT increase was found at multivariable analysis. The maximum RVPT increase occurred within 12 months from implantation in 19 of 321 (5.9%) patients, between the first and the second year in 12 of 321 (3.7%), between the second and the sixth year in eight of 321 (2.5%), and after the sixth year in two of 321 (0.6%). CONCLUSION: Despite technologic improvement in lead manufacturing, long-term increase of the RVPT occurs in about 13% of patients, possibly representing a serious safety issue in 3.7% when 2.5 V at 0.4 ms is exceeded. AVC algorithms can improve patients' safety by automatic tailoring of the pacing output to threshold fluctuations, while maximizing device longevity.