Bioassay of safinamide in biological fluids of humans and various animal species.

This paper describes three methods to bioassay safinamide (CAS 133865-89-1) in biological fluids of humans and laboratory animals for pharmacokinetic, toxicokinetic and bioavailability studies. Two methods profited from liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) system, one (micro bioassay) working in the low dynamic range 0.5-20 ng/ml, the other in the range 20-6000 ng/ml. A third method used high-performance liquid chromatrography with fluorimetric detection (HPLC-FD), working in the dynamic range 20-1000 ng/ml. All the three methods were validated in compliance with the accreditated views on analytical bioassays. The shorter run time (5.5 min vs 16 min) has led the authors to prefer the two LC-MS-MS methods to the HPLC-FD bioassay, even if all the performances of the three methods were excellent. The methods described in this paper were and are still now extensively used to assay safinamide in more than 10,000 specimens of biological fluids from humans and laboratory animals in the development program of the drug. Main pharmacokinetic results obtained in various Phase I trials on healthy volunteers are briefly reported.

Bioequivalence study of fluoxetine hydrochloride in healthy volunteers.

Fluoxetine hydrochloride (CAS 59333-67-4) is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) widely used as antidepressant drug. The aim of the present trial was to assess the bioequivalence of a new formulation of the drug (test formulation) as compared to a reference product from the Swiss market. Both drugs were available as 20 mg dispersible tablets. The trial was performed according to a two-period, two-sequence, balanced, randomised, single-dose design with a wash-out phase of at least 56 days. The two formulations were tested in 30 male healthy volunteers. A specific highly sensitive bioassay in tandem mass spectrometry allowed to set the limit of quantification to 100 pg/ml for fluoxetine and norfluoxetine. Average t(max) was 5.4 h for fluoxetine and 71-80 h for norfluoxetine. The peak concentration was on average 14 ng/ml for fluoxetine and 10.5 ng/ml for norfluoxetine. Half-life was on average 48-50 h for fluoxetine and 130-138 h for norfluoxetine. AUC infinity for fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were on average 790 and 2800 ng x ml(-1) x h, respectively. All these figures demonstrate that plasma concentration-time profiles of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine are quite different. Applied statistical tests, suggested by operating guidelines, demonstrated bioequivalence of the test formulation and the reference formulation. The conclusion on bioequivalence was based on both fluoxetine and norfluoxetine results. 90 % confidence Intervals for Cmax, AUCt and AUC infinity (fluoxetine and norfluoxetine) were within the acceptance range (0.80-1.25) and t(max), processed with a non-parametric test, did not show any statistically significant difference between test and reference formulation. Safety and tolerability proved to be similarly good with both test and reference formulation. In conclusion, the present trial has demonstrated bioequivalence of the test and the reference formulation, both consisting of fluoxetine hydrochloride dispersible tablets.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparative study of zofenopril and enalapril in healthy volunteers.

Zofenopril calcium (CAS 81938-43-4) is a new angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, which in addition to the typical activity of the class, proved to possess a specific cardioprotective effect due also to the presence of the sulfhydryl group. In this trial zofenopril calcium and enalapril maleate (CAS 76095-16-4) were given to 20 healthy volunteers of both sexes in repeated dose regiment at two dose levels: 30 mg and 60 mg zofenopril calcium and 10 mg and 20 mg enalapril maleate. The study was conducted according to a two-period, two-sequence, crossover design, with washout. ACE activity in serum and zofenopril, zofenoprilat, enalapril and enalaprilat plasma concentrations were determined during and on the last day of the two study periods. Both zofenopril and enalapril were extensively converted through hydrolysis to their active metabolites zofenoprilat and enalaprilat, respectively. Zofenopril exhibited a complete and a more rapid hydrolysis rate compared to enalapril, which is reflected by the higher metabolite to parent drug ratio of Cmax and AUCss, tau showed by this compound. Even though only two dose levels were investigated in this trial, the pharmacokinetics of both drugs seem to be linear. In line with previous trials, both compounds at both dose levels investigated produced complete or almost complete inhibition of ACE activity in serum, for a period lasting 6-8 h after administration, the inhibition being still relevant 24 h thereafter. The tolerability of the two drugs at both dose levels proved to be very good as demonstrated by subjective and objective symptoms, by the absence of relevant adverse events, and by laboratory biochemical parameters and vital signs evaluated before and after the trial. Blood pressure showed a fairly decreasing trend with both the drugs, systolic and diastolic blood pressure values being however within normal range in all the subjects. In no case symptoms of hypotension were experienced. In conclusion, zofenopril calcium and enalapril maleate show very good tolerability and appear to exert similar activity on serum ACE. The main difference in the pharmacokinetics of the two compounds is the conversion from pro-drug to the active metabolite which is faster with zofenopril.