ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: One of the greatest benefits of contemporary restorative dentistry is the creation of fixed partial dentures. The retention and durability of the fixed partial dentures may be improved by using a variety of tooth preparation methods, surface treatments, and luting resins. AIM: To measure the shear binding strength of resin cement to saliva-contaminated lithium disilicate (LDS) ceramic after being exposed to various cleaning treatments. METHODOLOGY: Over 30 LDS samples were examined. In Group 1, a cleansing solution comprising 15% zirconium oxide (Ivoclean) was employed for a duration of 20 s. This was succeeded by a rinsing phase lasting 15 s utilizing deionized water, followed by a 15-s period for drying. Subsequently, a final stage of air drying was conducted over a span of 15 s. In contrast, Group 2 underwent a washing procedure of 20 s involving a cleansing solution containing 30% sodium silicate. This was then ensued by a rinsing interval of 15 s with deionized water, succeeded by an air-drying process spanning 15 s. After applying cleaning solutions to the surface and adhering the specimens to the composite blocks using resin cement Multilink Automix (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), the shear bond strength was assessed. RESULTS: Using a 30% sodium silicate solution (Group 2), we were able to get the highest mean shear bond strength value after saliva-contaminated LDS. Group 1, 15% zirconium oxide (Ivoclean) had the weakest decontamination agents as measured by mean shear bond strengths. The shear bond strength values of the two groups were found to vary significantly between individuals using the independent sample t-test. LDs ceramic cleaned with a 30% sodium silicate solution had a higher shear bond strength than ceramic cleaned with Ivoclean (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The application of a 30% sodium silicate solution rendered the highest shear bond strength for saliva-contaminated LDS ceramic. In comparison, ceramic cleaned with Ivoclean exhibited notably lower shear bond strength values. The outcome of this investigation highlights the potential of diverse cleaning agents in influencing the adhesive qualities of resin cement, thereby contributing to the enhancement of fixed partial denture durability and efficacy.
ABSTRACT
Background The intercondylar distance is a predictable and invariable parameter, which is not influenced by the soft tissue limitations and resorption unlike comparable anatomical markers. Limited studies are available on the use of intercondylar distance for the selection of teeth arrangement and its relationship with varying face forms. Aim The study aimed to evaluate the relationship between intercondylar distance and maxillary intercanine tip distances and central incisor width in square, tapering, and ovoid facial forms. Materials and methods The comparative cross-sectional study was performed between January 2021 and August 2022. A convenience sampling strategy was used to include subjects between the ages of 18 and 40 years who had all of their natural teeth. The facial forms of the subjects were detected using a face form indicator and grouped into ovoid (group A), tapering (group B), and square (group C) forms comprising 63 subjects in each group. The intercondylar and intercanine distances and maxillary central incisor width were measured using a digital caliper. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY) was employed to determine the statistical difference between and across the groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc analysis, respectively. The correlation between the variables was determined by the Pearson correlation test. Results The average age of the subjects was 24.55±3.47 years, and the age distribution was found to be statistically insignificant between the groups (p=0.63). The study consisted of 21% of males and 79% of females. The mean intercondylar distance was 125.2 mm in ovoid, 123.1 mm in tapering, and 125.9 mm in square face forms (p<0.01). The mean intercanine distance was 34.82 mm for ovoid, 37.11 mm for tapering, and 37.04 mm for square facial forms (p<0.01). Similarly, the mean central incisor width was 9, 7.84, and 8.51 mm for ovoid, tapering, and square facial forms, respectively (p<0.01). The ratio of intercondylar and intercanine distances in ovoid, tapering, and square faces was 1:3.59, 1:3.31, and 1:3.39, respectively. The ratio of intercondylar and central incisor width was 1:13.9, 1:15.7, and 1:14.7 for the groups A, B, and C, respectively. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between square and ovoid incisor width, square intercanine and ovoid incisor width, tapering incisor width and intercondylar distance, tapering intercanine and intercondylar distances, and tapering incisor width and square intercanine distance. The relationship between intercondylar and intercanine distances and the central incisor width was also revealed to be statistically highly significant (p<0.01). Conclusion When face form is taken into account, tapering face form shows more positive result for the relationship of intercondylar distance with intercanine distance and central incisor width. In patients with edentulous conditions, the intercondylar distance may offer useful measurements for tooth selection.
