Clinical performance of Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET and Tc-99m-based SPECT in patients with extreme obesity.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the performance of stress imaging with technetium-99m-labeled tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with extreme obesity, defined as body mass index ≥40 kg/m2. METHODS: We identified patients with extreme obesity who underwent angiography in our center and either stress SPECT or PET within the previous six months. Cohorts of patients with extreme obesity and a <5% pretest likelihood of CAD who underwent SPECT (N = 25) or PET (N = 25) were also included. RESULTS: In total, 108 patients who underwent SPECT (N = 57) or PET (N = 51) were identified. Scan interpretation was classified as definitely normal or abnormal in 83.3% of PET and 60.5% of SPECT scans, respectively (P < .01). PET demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy and normalcy rate. PET was found to have higher specificity for the pooled cohort. Similar findings were observed using stenosis cut-offs of ≥50% and ≥70%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with extreme obesity, PET enabled more definitive scan interpretation with less artifact compared to SPECT. PET provided higher diagnostic accuracy and specificity in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease.

Myocardial viability: it is still alive.

Heart failure presents a significant problem in industrialized countries, with a high prevalence, morbidity, and mortality, where it is most frequently caused by coronary artery disease. Revascularization in patients with symptomatic heart failure has been associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes. Predictors of outcome benefit from revascularization include the presence and extent of hibernating myocardium, ischemia, scar, left ventricular ejection fraction, and renal function. Viability is useful in directing the management of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. It is especially useful in those with the highest risk where revascularization decisions are the most difficult. In the absence of definitive prospective randomized data on the benefit of routine viability testing in the management of ischemic cardiomyopathy, physicians will likely continue to use viability testing to assist them with their decision-making process. This review article focuses on the value of viability imaging and the modalities of its measurement, which include PET, SPECT, cardiac MRI, and dobutamine echocardiography. These imaging modalities should be seen as complementary rather than competing methods. In any given clinical setting, the indications, comorbidities, availability, local expertise, sensitivity, specificity, and limitations of each modality need to be considered. When advanced imaging (PET and cardiac MRI) are available, they are generally considered the preferred choice because of their overall higher accuracy. Finally, we explore the role of ischemia in patients with viability and the potential role of neurohormonal and viability imaging in deciding the need for implantable cardiac defibrillator as a primary prevention in patients with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Prognostic value of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients after heart transplant.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is a key prognostic determinant after heart transplant. Detection and risk stratification of patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy are problematic. Positron emission tomography using rubidium-82 allows quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow and may have utility for risk stratification in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with a history of heart transplant undergoing dipyridamole rubidium-82 positron emission tomography were prospectively enrolled. Myocardial perfusion and left ventricular ejection fraction were recorded. Absolute flow quantification at rest and after dipyridamole stress as well as the ratio of mean global flow at stress and at rest, termed myocardial flow reserve, were calculated. Patients were followed for all-cause death, acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure hospitalization. A total of 140 patients (81% men; median age, 62 years; median follow-up, 18.2 months) were included. There were 14 events during follow-up (9 deaths, 1 acute coronary syndrome, and 4 heart failure admissions). In addition to baseline clinical variables (estimated glomerular filtration rate, previously documented cardiac allograft vasculopathy), relative perfusion defects, mean myocardial flow reserve, and mean stress myocardial blood flow were significant predictors of adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormalities on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography were predictors of adverse events in heart transplant patients. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Prevalence of cardiac sarcoidosis in patients presenting with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease of unknown etiology, which involves the heart in 5-25% of cases. Although ventricular tachycardia (VT) has been reported as the first presentation of sarcoidosis, its prevalence has not previously been investigated. In this prospective study, we sought to systematically investigate the prevalence of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) in patients presenting with monomorphic VT (MMVT) and no previous history of sarcoidosis. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with MMVT to a tertiary care center were screened for inclusion. Patients with idiopathic VT, VT secondary to coronary artery disease, or prior diagnosis of sarcoidosis were excluded. Included patients underwent F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scan. In subjects with PET scanning suggestive of active myocardial inflammation, histological diagnosis was confirmed through extracardiac or endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). RESULTS: A total of 182 patients presented to our institution with VT between February 2010 and September 2012 and 14 subjects met inclusion criteria. Within this group, six of 14 (42%) patients had abnormal PET scans suggesting active myocardial inflammation. Four of the six patients had tissue biopsies that were diagnostic of sarcoidosis; the remaining two patients had guided EMB indicating nonspecific myocarditis. Atrioventricular block was observed in three of four (75%) patients with CS and none in 10 of the others (P = 0.022). Three of the four patients had pulmonary sarcoidosis and one patient had isolated CS. All four patients were treated with corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, four of 14 (28%) patients presenting with MMVT (without idiopathic VT, ischemic VT, or known sarcoidosis) had CS as the underlying etiology. Clinicians should consider screening for CS in patients with unexplained MMVT.

Is there an association between clinical presentation and the location and extent of myocardial involvement of cardiac sarcoidosis as assessed by ¹8F- fluorodoexyglucose positron emission tomography?

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography using (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is an emerging modality for diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). We compared the location and degree of FDG uptake in CS patients presenting with either advanced atrioventricular block (AVB) or ventricular tachycardia (VT). METHODS AND RESULTS: We included consecutive patients who presented with either AVB or VT with a diagnosis of CS. A cohort of patients with clinically silent CS was included as controls. FDG activity was quantified as standardized uptake values (SUV) and both the overall mean left ventricular (LV) SUV as well as the Maximum Mean Segmental SUV was recorded for each patient. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify cutoff SUV values that best identified patients with VT. A total of 27 patients with CS were included (13 females; mean age, 56 ± 8 years; 8 VT, 12 AVB, and 7 controls). Both mean LV SUV and Max SUV in CS patients presenting with VT were significantly higher compared with those with AVB (mean SUV: VT median 5.33, range 4.7-9.35 versus AVB median 2.48, range 0.86-8.59, P=0.016; max SUV: VT median 11.07, range 9.24-14.4 versus AVB median 5.63, range 3.42-15.71, P=0.005) and compared with controls. There was no significant difference in SUV values between AVB patients and controls. ROC analysis for identification of patients with VT showed AUCs of 0.93 and 0.895 for a mean LV SUV of >3.42 and a max SUV >8.56, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CS patients with VT displayed significantly higher FDG uptake when compared with those with AVB and asymptomatic controls. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate this finding.

Myocardial viability: whom, what, why, which, and how?

Viability imaging might be useful to guide decisions for revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Recent trial results raise important points for clinicians regarding which modalities to use and in which patients. We discuss the modalities currently used in clinical practice. We suggest that testing be reserved for complex patients in whom the risks and potential benefits from revascularization are highest, and emphasize that the results of viability testing are not the only determinant of potential outcome benefit, and should not be viewed in isolation but as an objective adjunct to decision making.

Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of rubidium (Rb)-82 positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in comparison to single-photon emission tomography (SPECT). BACKGROUND: Myocardial perfusion imaging is widely used in the assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD. PET using Rb-82 has potential advantages over SPECT that may make it more accurate and that reduce radiation exposure compared with SPECT but has increased costs. Comparisons of these technologies are highly relevant for policy makers and practice guidelines. However, studies directly comparing Rb-82 PET with contemporary SPECT have been limited. METHOD: The authors therefore undertook a systematic review of studies where either Rb-82 PET or technetium-99m SPECT with both attenuation correction and electrocardiography-gating were used as a diagnostic test for obstructive CAD with invasive coronary angiogram as a reference standard. These technologies were then compared. RESULTS: Fifteen PET and 8 SPECT studies (1,344 and 1,755 patients, respectively) met inclusion criteria and pooled accuracy using weighted averages according to the size of the patient population was determined for PET and SPECT with sensitivities of 90% (confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 0.92) and 85% (CI: 0.82 to 0.87) and specificities of 88% (CI: 0.85 to 0.91) and 85% (CI: 0.82 to 0.87), respectively. Summary receiver-operating characteristic curves were computed: area under the curve was 0.95 and 0.90 for PET and SPECT, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was heterogeneity among study populations and some studies were limited by referral bias. CONCLUSIONS: Rb-82 PET is accurate for the detection of obstructive CAD and, despite advances in SPECT technology, remains superior. More widespread use of Rb-82 PET may be beneficial to improve CAD detection.