Understanding the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of community-dwelling older adults and their carers about the modification of oral medicines: A qualitative interview study to inform healthcare professional practice.

BACKGROUND: Oral medicines are commonly modified (e.g. tablets split/crushed) to meet the dosing and swallowing requirements of older adults. However, there is limited research investigating the opinions of community-dwelling patients and carers about medicine modification. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the views of community-dwelling older adults and their carers about oral medicine modification. METHODS: Semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted with community-dwelling older adults and carers of older adults who experienced difficulty swallowing medicines, or who required medicines to be modified. Participants were recruited from purposively selected community pharmacies using a combination of purposive, convenience and snowball sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. The Francis method governed when data saturation had been reached. RESULTS: Twenty-six interviews (13 patients, 13 carers) were conducted (76.9% female, median length 11 min (IQR 8-16 min)). Four themes emerged from the data: variation in medical needs and preferences; balancing acceptance and resignation; healthcare professional engagement and; opportunities for optimising formulation suitability. The heterogeneity of medical conditions experienced by community-dwelling older adults resulted in a variety of modifications being required. Patients and carers are accepting of their medications and formulations. However, when challenges arise, they tend to feel resigned to coping within the constraints of the current medication regimen, resulting in a lack of focused communication with healthcare professionals. Thus, healthcare professionals were unaware of their difficulties and unable to offer advice or solutions. CONCLUSION: Healthcare professionals must engage proactively with this group. Whilst a holistic approach to medication management is ideal, the disadvantage is that no single healthcare professional may identify this as their responsibility. Whilst the input and expertise of all healthcare professionals will be required, as medication experts, the pharmacy profession should take ownership and become the champion of, and for, the patient.

Oral medicine modification for older adults: a qualitative study of nurses.

OBJECTIVE: Oral medicines are frequently modified (eg, tablets crushed) for older adults. However, these modifications can have clinical, legal and/or ethical implications. Nurses bear responsibility for medicine administration and hence, perform these modifications. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of nurses about oral medicine modification for older adults. DESIGN: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with nurses providing care to older adults in acute and long-term care settings. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. SETTINGS: Sixteen purposively selected care settings; 4 acute-care and 12 long-term care settings were included. Nurses were recruited by convenience sampling at these sites. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen nurses participated (83% female, 67% long-term care, 33% acute-care, median age (IQR) 38 years (32.5-52.0)). RESULTS: Three major themes: modifying-a necessary evil, nurses' role as patient advocate and modifying-we are working very much as a team and two minor themes: fractional dosing, and covert administration emerged from the data. Nurses viewed oral medicine modifications as being a routine and necessary occurrence in geriatric patient care due to limitations of available formulations and the presence of age-related challenges in drug administration. Nurses' knowledge of residents' requirements ensured that they advocate for those with individualised formulation needs, however, nurses rely on pharmacists for information about modifications. Nurses expressed a desire for supports including increased education and ward-specific, pharmacist-developed recommendations on common modifications. CONCLUSIONS: This study has provided useful insights into the views of nurses regarding oral medicine modification for older adults. The unique and varied formulation requirements of older adults must be acknowledged. Increased engagement by healthcare professionals, the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies and policy-makers is required to facilitate the development of age-appropriate formulations. In the interim, practical interventions, informed by the findings of this study, are required.

Parental knowledge, attitudes and beliefs on fever: a cross-sectional study in Ireland.

OBJECTIVES: Fever is a common symptom of mostly benign illness in young children, yet concerning for parents. The aim of this study was to describe parental knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding fever in children aged ≤5 years of age. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study using a previously validated questionnaire. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. SETTING: Purposively selected primary schools (n=8) in Cork, Ireland, using a paper-based questionnaire. Data were collected from a cross-sectional internet-based questionnaire with a convenience sample of parents via websites and web pages (n=10) previously identified in an interview study. PARTICIPANTS: Parents with at least one child aged ≤5 years were invited to participate in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parental knowledge, attitudes and beliefs when managing fever in children. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and four parents contributed to this research (121 parents from schools and 983 parents through an online questionnaire). Almost two-thirds of parents (63.1%) identified temperatures at which they define fever that were either below or above the recognised definition of temperature (38°C). Nearly two of every three parents (64.6%) alternate between two fever-reducing medications when managing a child's fever. Among parents, years of parenting experience, age, sex, educational status or marital status did not predict being able to correctly identify a fever, neither did they predict if the parent alternated between fever-reducing medications. CONCLUSIONS: Parental knowledge of fever and fever management was found to be deficient which concurs with existing literature. Parental experience and other sociodemographic factors were generally not helpful in identifying parents with high or low levels of knowledge. Resources to help parents when managing a febrile illness need to be introduced to help all parents provide effective care.

The effects of mindfulness-based interventions for health and social care undergraduate students - a systematic review of the literature.

Health and social care undergraduate students experience stress due to high workloads and pressure to perform. Consequences include depression and burnout. Mindfulness may be a suitable way to reduce stress in health and social care degree courses. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and critically appraise the literature on the effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions for health and social care undergraduate students. PubMed, EMBASE, Psych Info, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library and Academic Search Complete were searched from inception to 21st November 2016. Studies that delivered Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, or an intervention modelled closely on these, to health or social care undergraduate students were included. Eleven studies, representing medicine, nursing and psychology students met the inclusion criteria. The most commonly used measurement tools were; the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and the General Health Questionnaire. Short term benefits relating to stress and mood were reported, despite all but one study condensing the curriculum. Gender and personality emerged as factors likely to affect intervention results. Further research with long-term follow-up is required to definitively conclude that mindfulness is an appropriate intervention to mentally prepare health and social care undergraduate students for their future careers.

The knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of patients and their healthcare professionals around oral dosage form modification: A systematic review of the qualitative literature.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the available qualitative evidence on the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of adult patients, healthcare professionals and carers about oral dosage form modification. DESIGN: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies was undertaken, utilising the thematic synthesis approach. DATA SOURCES: The following databases were searched from inception to September 2015: PubMed, Medline (EBSCO), EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest Databases, Scopus, Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). Citation tracking and searching the references lists of included studies was also undertaken. Grey literature was searched using the OpenGrey database, internet searching and personal knowledge. An updated search was undertaken in June 2016. REVIEW METHODS: Studies meeting the following criteria were eligible for inclusion; (i) used qualitative data collection and analysis methods; (ii) full-text was available in English; (iii) included adult patients who require oral dosage forms to be modified to meet their needs or; (iv) carers or healthcare professionals of patients who require oral dosage forms to be modified. Two reviewers independently appraised the quality of the included studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist. A thematic synthesis was conducted and analytical themes were generated. RESULTS: Of 5455 records screened, seven studies were eligible for inclusion; three involved healthcare professionals and the remaining four studies involved patients. Four analytical themes emerged from the thematic synthesis: (i) patient-centred individuality and variability; (ii) communication; (iii) knowledge and uncertainty and; (iv) complexity. The variability of individual patient's requirements, poor communication practices and lack of knowledge about oral dosage form modification, when combined with the complex and multi-faceted healthcare environment complicate decision making regarding oral dosage form modification and administration. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review has highlighted the key factors influencing the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of patients and healthcare professionals about oral dosage form modifications. The findings suggest that in order to optimise oral medicine modification practices the needs of individual patients should be routinely and systematically assessed and decision-making should be supported by evidence based recommendations with multidisciplinary input. Further research is needed to optimise oral dosage form modification practices and the factors identified in this review should be considered in the development of future interventions.

Modification of oral dosage forms for the older adult: An Irish prevalence study.

Age-related pharmacological changes complicate oral dosage form (ODF) suitability for older adults. The aim of this study was to investigate the appropriateness of ODF for older adults by determining the prevalence of ODF modifications in an aged care facility in Ireland. Drug charts for eligible patients were obtained. Details of all medications administered were recorded. ODF modifications were examined to determine if they were evidence-based: defined as complying with the product license or best practice guidelines (BPG). In total, of 111 patients, 35.1% received at least one modified medicine. Medicines were most commonly modified to facilitate fractional dosing (82.0%). Of the 68 instances of medicine modification, 35.3% complied with the product license. Of the 44 unlicensed modifications, 14 complied with BPG. Therefore, 44.1% of modifications were not evidence-based. This study highlights that clinicians have to routinely tailor commercial ODF to meet older patients' needs despite the lack of an evidence-base for almost half of these modifications. The main factor contributing to these modifications is the lack of appropriate, licensed dosage forms. However, reimbursement policies also play a role. Research is needed to optimise medicine administration and to provide clinicians with much needed evidence to support their daily practice.

Older adults with difficulty swallowing oral medicines: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Difficulty swallowing oral medicines may arise due to swallowing disorders or due to patient self-reported difficulty in the absence of objective evidence of swallowing dysfunction. Medication use increases with age; therefore, difficulty swallowing medication may complicate medicine administration to older patients. Modifying oral medicines can impact on the safety, quality and efficacy of the medication. The objective of this systematic review is to critically appraise the evidence regarding the prevalence of difficulty swallowing oral medicines and the modification of oral medicines to overcome swallowing difficulties in the older cohort. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and ProQuest databases was conducted from database inception to November 2014. Studies investigating the prevalence of difficulty swallowing oral medicines or the modification of oral medicines were eligible for inclusion. A narrative analysis of the results was conducted. RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion criteria. The results suggest that approximately 14 % of community-dwelling older patients experience difficulty swallowing medicines. Between one quarter and one third of occasions of medicine administration to older patients involve the modification of oral medicines. CONCLUSIONS: Difficulty swallowing oral medicines and the modification of medicines are reported as being common issues in the older cohort. However, evidence to support such contentions is limited. Future research should investigate the prevalence of medicine modification for older patients in all settings and identify what medicines are modified. This will allow targeting of interventions to optimise medicine administration to older patients.