ABSTRACT
The hospice interdisciplinary team (IDT) has been recognized as an ideal model for interprofessional collaboration. To address the manner in which interdisciplinary practices are perceived by team members, this study explored profession-based similarities and differences in perceptions among the four core hospice IDT members (physicians, nurses, social workers, and spiritual care providers) as well as experiences on the IDT. Semistructured interviews with 20 hospice professionals, 5 from each profession, were completed. Findings suggested that while hospice professions share some perceptions and experiences about hospice team membership, strengths of and barriers to teamwork, and individual members' contribution to the team, significant profession-based differences exist largely in the area of hospice team membership beyond the core members, type of language and descriptions used, perceptions of causes and effects of barriers to teamwork, and understandings of how team effectiveness is evaluated. Changes at the team-based, organizational, policy, and educational levels are needed to further maximize strengths of individual hospice IDT member and team qualities.
Subject(s)
Attitude , Cooperative Behavior , Hospice Care/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Clergy/psychology , Female , Group Processes , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Professional Role , Qualitative Research , Social Workers/psychology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
This study surveyed 4 core hospice professionals (physicians, nurses, social workers, and chaplains) on their perceived level of interdisciplinary collaboration, the influences of interdisciplinary collaboration, and job satisfaction to determine potential similarities and differences based on profession and various demographic characteristics of the members or member hospices. Analysis found that there are overall no differences based on demographic characteristics. Differences between professions, while few, were largely in the area of perceptions on relationships between members of the hospice team. Specifically, social workers appear to perceive themselves as less connected to the other members of the interdisciplinary team, an area theorized to influence interdisciplinary collaboration. Difference between professions was also found in job satisfaction. Implications for hospice practice and interdisciplinary education are discussed.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Hospice Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Team , Adult , Clergy/psychology , Clergy/statistics & numerical data , Cooperative Behavior , Female , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Male , Middle Aged , Nurses/psychology , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Team/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/psychology , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Social Workers/psychology , Social Workers/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Targeted mentoring refers to mentoring aimed at a particular population. This article presents the evaluation of a mentoring program for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in social work education. Forty-three mentors and protégés responded to a survey regarding their program experiences. The results highlight the need for targeted mentoring, although some disparities of experience for mentors and protégés in this program are apparent. In general, mentors felt positive about participating, giving back to the LGBT community, and were more satisfied with their experiences than were the protégés, who were looking for more specific types of instrumental and psychosocial support.
