Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 40(5): 541-5, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26814509

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Autotransfusion of red cells is common in many surgical specialties. However, this technique is not uniformly used in abdominal trauma. The purpose of this paper is to study the outcomes of patients who were autotransfused during emergency trauma operations in which they sustained full-thickness hollow viscus injury (HVI). METHODS: A total of 179 patients in period 1999-2008 with penetrating and blunt abdominal trauma requiring intraoperative blood transfusion were evaluated. Recipients of autotransfusion and banked blood (autotransfused group) were compared with recipients of banked blood products only (control group). The t-test, Chi-squared, and Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the data. Multivariate regression analysis evaluated the primary outcomes, survival and bloodstream infection (BSI). RESULTS: Of the 179 patients, 108 controls and 71 autotransfused patients were evaluated. The results showed no statistically significant difference between the control and autotransfusion groups regarding age, injury pattern/severity [Injury Severity Score (ISS)], length of stay, postoperative international normalized ratio (INR), and volume of banked blood products. Both groups were also proportional with colon injury. The estimated operative blood loss (EBL) was 2,472 ± 3,261 for controls and 4,056 ± 3,825 for the autotransfused group (p = 0.0001). The total volume of blood transfused was 2,792 and 5,513 for controls and patients in the autotransfusion group, respectively (p = 0.002). Ninety controls (84 %) and 53 autotransfused patients (76 %) survived to discharge (p = 0.21). Twenty controls (49 %) and 17 autotransfused patients (45 %) developed BSI (p = 0.72). Logistic regression analysis revealed that an ISS >25, systolic blood pressure <90, and EBL >2 L predicted mortality. There was also a trend towards decreased survival with age >50 years. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that emergent autotransfusion worsens clinical outcomes in the setting of concomitant HVI.

2.
Gastroenterology ; 97(4): 827-36, 1989 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2777040

ABSTRACT

To determine the long-term efficacy, safety, and toxicity of omeprazole, we studied 40 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome given omeprazole for 6-51 mo (median 29). The mean daily dose of omeprazole required to control gastric acid secretion was 82 +/- 31 mg. Thirty-one patients required omeprazole once per day. In 9 patients acid output was not controlled by 120 mg once per day, but was controlled by 60 mg every 12 h. The daily dose of omeprazole correlated with the previous dose of histamine H2-receptor antagonist (r = 0.89, p less than 0.001), basal acid output (r = 0.43, p less than 0.01), and maximal acid output (r = 0.39, p less than 0.02) but not with serum concentration of gastrin (r = -0.32). Increases in the dose of omeprazole were required in 9 patients. Twenty-nine patients had mild peptic symptoms with acid outputs less than 10 mEq/h while taking histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Symptoms resolved completely in 23 patients and partially in 3 when taking omeprazole. Omeprazole prevented mucosal disease in all patients including 17 in whom histamine H2-receptor antagonists had produced only partial resolution despite acid output being less than 10 mEq/h and in those with symptoms during omeprazole therapy. Omeprazole therapy was not associated with any significant side effects, nor with any evidence of hematologic or biochemical toxicity. Serum concentrations of gastrin did not change significantly during therapy. In 6 patients treated with omeprazole for 1 yr there was no change in basal or maximal acid output. In all patients, gastric morphology and histopathology demonstrated no evidence of gastric carcinoid formation. These results demonstrate that with long-term treatment of up to 4 yr, omeprazole is safe, with no evidence of hematologic, biochemical, or gastric toxicity. Furthermore, omeprazole remained effective, with only 23% of patients requiring an increase in dose, and continued to control symptoms in patients who had not been entirely symptom-free despite high doses of histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Omeprazole is now the drug of choice in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.


Subject(s)
Omeprazole/therapeutic use , Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Gastric Acid/metabolism , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Omeprazole/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome/metabolism , Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...